Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

nuckin_futz

Jury finds no negligence in trial over man's 8-month erection.

23 posts in this topic

WILMINGTON, Delaware (Reuters) - A jury on Monday cleared a doctor of negligence in a lawsuit filed by a Delaware truck driver who underwent a penile implant procedure and ended up with an erection that lasted eight months.

"We're stunned," attorney Michael Heyden said as he left the New Castle County courthouse, where his client Daniel Metzgar, 44, of Newark, Delaware, was suing urologist Thomas Desperito of Wilmington, Delaware.

In April 2010, four months after the procedure was performed, Metzgar experienced swelling and went to a hospital, where he underwent testing. Before going to the hospital, Metzgar had been unable to reach Dr. Desperito.

The doctor's lawyer argued that hospital staff who performed tests were unfamiliar with penile implants and were not properly trained to do them. Therefore, the results from the tests, including images showing swelling, did not prove negligence.

Metzgar and his attorney during the one-week trial described the frequent discomfort and daily embarrassment he experienced after the procedure - including trouble riding a motorcycle, wearing normal clothes and joining family social events.

"I could hardly dance, with an erection poking my partner," Metzgar told jurors at the start of the trial. "It's not something you want to bring out at parties and show to friends."

Metzgar's stepson Alexander King, 18, described a once close relationship that grew distant after the procedure. King felt uncomfortable having friends over and noticed his stepfather stopped showing up at school and sporting events.

"I was - I'm sorry - highly embarrassed," he testified during the trial.

The device was ultimately removed in 2010 after tubing punctured Metzgar's scrotum. He received a replacement implant from another doctor.

Metzgar had no comment on the jury verdict.

The doctor's lawyer, Colleen Shields, said, "We think the jury reached the appropriate verdict."

*************************************************

The jury had a hard decision to make. He was facing a stiff sentence.

Sorry CDC no pics with this one.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wow that wood certainly be embarrassing

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Imagine having to hover to dump for eight straight months.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok seriously are you just really happy to us all the time?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to say, I'm surprised.

I expected a stiff sentence....

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That would have sucked when he'd have to use the washroom!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn poor guy. What a long and hard ordeal that must have been!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pull it up and tuck it under the waist of the pants/boxers

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Penile implant? How shallow can people be?

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He kinda got boned on the decision.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pull it up and tuck it under the waist of the pants/boxers

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pull it up and tuck it under the waist of the pants/boxers

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.