Brick Tamland Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 There is a lot of baggage with both of these guys. Could CS bring back a MA Fleury type of player with the other just clearing cap space? I haven't heard anyone mention moving both goalies, but if you really want to start a new chapter, maybe you really clean house. Great return on CS and cleared cap space for Lou. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naslund.is.king Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 A new chapter in stupidity and lack of prioritizing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueberries Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 Why would both be moved? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noheart Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 There is a lot of baggage with both of these guys. Could CS bring back a MA Fleury type of player with the other just clearing cap space? I haven't heard anyone mention moving both goalies, but if you really want to start a new chapter, maybe you really clean house. Great return on CS and cleared cap space for Lou. Please explain the CS baggage theory, I need a good laugh to lift my spirits Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MANGO Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 we'd have nothing to argue about then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Go Faulk Yourself Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 we'd have nothing to argue about then There would still be Gillis for making this decision to move both goalies which would cause an uproar in CDC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lowest common denominator Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 ya got nothin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tystick Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 Lol, yeahhhhh No. Best scenario is we keep Luo, and trade Schneider for some serious upgrades. Unfortunately that scenario probably doesn't suit Luongo very well anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuck nit Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 Yeah,Luo is a laugh a minute and willing to play for free now that Torts (the human highlight reel) is on board. Not. I would trade both goalies if I could get a world class PP d man in return.Another goalie can always be brought in. Time for one bold move instead of a stupid move like hiring Torts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edlerberry Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 This is a joke, obviously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naslund.is.king Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 This is a joke, obviously. i am afraid not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Onions Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 A lot of jokes in CDC turn out to be actual thoughts. But this is an interesting idea. We would have to get some form of a ready to be number 1 goal tender if we were to trade both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanKeslord17 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 To all the people Completely throwning the topic off, it's possible. They trade Schneider for something amazing, too good to refuse. Then Luongo is given the number one position and he says, listen, I don't want to play for this team anymore after all the BS that I've been through. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Killer Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 To all the people Completely throwning the topic off, it's possible. They trade Schneider for something amazing, too good to refuse. Then Luongo is given the number one position and he says, listen, I don't want to play for this team anymore after all the BS that I've been through. I'm sure they'd make sure he's committed before they'd trade schneider. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brick Tamland Posted June 30, 2013 Author Share Posted June 30, 2013 Nay sayers can say what they want. The CS baggage is the circus he put up with here and NOW being the center of trade rumours. To think both these guys couldn't be moved is not that far out of the realm of reality. CS gets best return, moving Luongo clears a LOT of cap freedom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jester13 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 Yes, but no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Underachieving Hero of CDC Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 I can only really see them trading Schneider if Gillis is totally and completely unable to find anyone genuinely interested in taking Luongo off our hands. Its not out of the realm of possibility. I know that if I were a rival gm, I wouldn't want to go anywhere near Luongo and his monstrosity of a contract. If that happens, then Schneider has to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanKeslord17 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 I'm sure they'd make sure he's committed before they'd trade schneider. Perhaps, but Luongo will be playing here knowing that its only because nobody traded for him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 We could move both goalies but I can't see it happening unless we sign a UFA like Mike Smith as our starter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobopan Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 Please explain the CS baggage theory, I need a good laugh to lift my spirits Im wondering the same... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.