Boudrias Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 People who think Edler will suck with Tortorella make up the stupidest reasons. Edler played as a puck mover when he doesn't have the speed to be a puck mover, of course he is going to look bad. I've said that since Ehrhoff left, the team put too much pressure on Edler to put up Ehrhoff type points. Tortorella will hopefully find the strengths of the players and give them proper roles that work in their advantage. He's made everyone of his D in the Rangers look fantastic. Even, Anton Stralman looked good defensively and people are using "guts" and Edler being "quiet" as reasons that he wouldn't gel with Tortorella? Man oh Man, people are so blind. Teams around the league still see Edler has a potential number 1 and at 5 Million per year, It's an absolute steal. The only reason, and I'm totally against trading Edler is the fact that Gillis has screwed himself up by giving everyone on D a NTC and therefore, the Canuck's cap is screwed. Canucks get a hell lot easier to play against without Edler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westcoast Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 I always liked how he went headhunting in the playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apples Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 If he get land us a top 6 foward I'll be happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 trading edler would be foolish move. Even though edler messed up in the playoffs, its hard to not see what he brings to the table: strong defence, decent offence, good size, and good head for the game. If they trade edler they are idiots. Trade bieksa, he pushes opponents on top of our goalies and is definitely not as good as edler in all aspects of the game. Plus hes old.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAMBUTANS Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 Edler to Detroit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brocklovich Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 Where does detroit draft? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iinatcc Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 Canucks trading one of their younger D-Core who happens to produce 40+ pts a season. Um no. Say what want about Alex Edler but Canucks will have a huge hole on Defense if they do this unless they actually want to commit with Ballard or a Top 4 in FA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UFCanuck Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 One minute CDC says MG is the best GM, now CDC has turned on MG. One minute CDC says AV is a good coach, then a bad coach who doesn't give underperformers a fair shake and wants him gone. Now we have Torts, CDC doesn't have much good to say...you would almost think that they want him traded for AV. CDC wants bold moves but then they insist that MG give the players away for nothing (eg Luongo). Cmon CDC....take your hormone shots and quit whining! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panelguy Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 Lets see what Edler can do under the new coach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monza Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 am I crazy would this not be enough or at least close enough. Schneider, Edler 1st for the 1st overall we take mackinnon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SergioMomesso Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 I really hope the Canucks don't trade Edler, for as bad as some people want him gone. 50 point dman are rare and the ablity that Edler has would be a big mistake in my eyes anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SergioMomesso Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 I really hope the Canucks don't trade Edler, for as bad as some people want him gone. 50 point dman are rare and the ablity that Edler has would be a big mistake in my eyes anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuck nit Posted June 30, 2013 Author Share Posted June 30, 2013 TSN just asked Gillis about Eddie and Gillis said he had no more cap issues so the Edler trade is less of an issue now. That Luongo contract really took precedence only a few years after it was signed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Outsiders Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 I would trade Edler for bobby ryan and a 1st Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Standing_Tall#37 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 Edler+Schroeder+2013 1st for Skinner? I'd do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Standing_Tall#37 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 TSN just asked Gillis about Eddie and Gillis said he had no more cap issues so the Edler trade is less of an issue now. That Luongo contract really took precedence only a few years after it was signed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BI3KSA- Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 Every negotiation starts with one side asking for a high price. That's how negotiation works. Why would Gillis start off by asking a fair price? He wants to see if there's a team out there that's desperate enough to overpay for Edler. If all he gets are fair prices, we're beter off keeping Edler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noheart Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 What will Milbury Jr get for Edler? Scott Gomez and a 6th? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J529 Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 What will Milbury Jr get for Edler? Scott Gomez and a 6th? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Outsiders Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 Are we trading edler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.