• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

harmer

[Rumour] Canucks interested in Matt Cooke

139 posts in this topic

I would be pumped if Cooke made his way back to Van. I doubt a team with such a tarnished image would take a gamble on Cookie though.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Definite bite and grit but where is the top end skill? Need a skilled sniper for the second line otherwise its focus on shutting down the Sedins FTW!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hendricks' news is posted but if you wanna support that cooke news with the source from news1130 (which i'm too lazy to find) go right ahead

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^^^^ Too many agitators and not enough skill.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sedin sedin burrows

Higgins kesler booth

Cooke gaunce hansen

Hendricks lapierre kassian

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would love to have the two Matts here! AV is gone. No more Cookie hating.

Get them done Gillis!!

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^^^^ Too many agitators and not enough skill.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we could get Hendricks for $1 Million per and Cookie for under $2 Million per then they'd be perfect fits.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Typical welcoming him back now that he's past his due date.

Still, Cooke's one of the best hitters in the league. We could use some more of that.

Hendricks... Heard his name before. Meh.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hendricks thread:

This one can be for Matt Cooke

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Definite bite and grit but where is the top end skill? Need a skilled sniper for the second line otherwise its focus on shutting down the Sedins FTW!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gillis said he wanted to get younger. But then, MG says a lot of things that he doesn't necessarily follow.

I'd be happy to take Cooke for a 4th line role at 1m or less, but I'm not sure other teams and fans need any more reasons to hate us....

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cookie is still a tough bottom 6 player.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In Michael Scotts voice: NO GOD NO! NOOO!

I LOATH matt cooke, especially after what he did to Savard, if he comes here I will be miserable, Hendricks yes tho

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My buddy said no way we hire Torts, no way we trade Schneider and no way in hell Cooke's coming back. I'm loling at him hard if it's a strikeout by the weekend.

I don't have a huge problem with any of the 'bold' moves, but a lot of Canucks fans are getting ticked off.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing wrong with Cooke on the 4th line.

2 seasons ago i would have said no,but now i am fine with it

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.