nuck nit Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 When a team begins icing rookies in a forward fashion it is because they screwed up on their cap,not because they want to. The American Hockey League is where young men ply their trade before they take a veteran's spot. The Canucks have never had four lines that can score and hit,never mind two. The Twins are getting older and a second scoring line is essential for this team's chances this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 When a team begins icing rookies in a forward fashion it is because they screwed up on their cap,not because they want to. The American Hockey League is where young men ply their trade before they take a veteran's spot. The Canucks have never had four lines that can score and hit,never mind two. The Twins are getting older and a second scoring line is essential for this team's chances this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuck nit Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 would you like fenchcrys with your wambuger? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks1 Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 Booth and a young asset like Schroeder for a 2nd (Islanders) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 How many goals did the Canucks score last year vs Calgary or Edmonton? Both of them did not even make the playoffs and the Canucks could not win a single game. Many juveniles will be cwying in their Canucks jewseys ,wondering what went wong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuck nit Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 omg we didnt win the regular season series against the oilers last year? better jump of a building! Maybe one day the canucks will have 3 straight first overall picks. ..not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Garret's moustache Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 I'm sincerely asking this, so don't take it in the wrong way, but I really want to know- why don't we just use our second CBO on Booth? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 2012/2013 Northwest Division GF (goals for): Calgary 128 Vancouver 127 Edmonton 125 Minnesota 122 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CookieCrumbs Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 It's really a shame that Booth is still injured. Buying him out would be huge. I say trade the guy for whatever you can get. The cap space is too important right now. Lappy and Alberts are two guys I would love to see back. Raymond, Weise and Sestito should have all been gone. Higgins as well. He's overrated here and has no business being on the 2nd line. Ps. Booth - Schroeder - Hansen looks like a pretty dirty line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuck nit Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 why dont you post goals against tough guy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoosh Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 When a team begins icing rookies in a forward fashion it is because they screwed up on their cap,not because they want to. The American Hockey League is where young men ply their trade before they take a veteran's spot. The Canucks have never had four lines that can score and hit,never mind two. The Twins are getting older and a second scoring line is essential for this team's chances this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 Wait, what? You mean the Canucks, who have no cap space, are not going to be very active during the time of year when the most money is spent? Colour me surprised. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuck nit Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 I bet you haven't been around Canucks hockey much before this year... Look up some past stats and come back then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 How about you do something constructive pumpkin head? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuck nit Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 says you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 Including you. If the Gooseberry and Pumpkin are not able or willing to do anything constructive how about we mash you up for some refreshments or pie? Bring some ice cream when you get back to me with those stats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisbanks Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 I said this in another thread but I'll say it again: We currently have $7,497,222 in cap space. Trade Booth as a cap dump to a team with a good amount of cap space and we'll have $11,747,222, add in Tanev's $2 million and Weise's $750K as suggested and sign Lappy for $1.5 million a year and we're left with the exact same amount we currently have. Plenty of room to sign a guy like Horton, Iginla, or Clowe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuck nit Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 kinda hard on mobile. im this may come as a shock to you but I dont spend 9 hrs a day on a computer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 When you retire you can.By then you will have watched the Canucks for some forty or fifty years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Carell Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 I'm sincerely asking this, so don't take it in the wrong way, but I really want to know- why don't we just use our second CBO on Booth? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.