Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo
- - - - -

RADICAL Rule For Offense

Proposal

  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

#1 Nuxfanabroad

Nuxfanabroad

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,502 posts
  • Joined: 10-May 07

Posted 14 August 2013 - 07:44 PM

Suggested this before..Stick a dot smack dab in the high slot, little higher, maybe-but between the two FO circles, in each team's end. Use it for pk icings(allow 1 icing per penalty); so defenders gotta' make a choice, whenever they get control. Also use this FO dot for icings in the last 2 minutes of any period. Lastly, give offensive teams a lot of creative-leeway in these FO-formations; but strictly enforce the defensive set-up for them. This makes late-period minutes more intense/interesting, while also highlighting the importance of good strategically-offensive coaching.
  • 0

#2 Kazmanian Devil

Kazmanian Devil

    Your average poster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,376 posts
  • Joined: 08-July 10

Posted 14 August 2013 - 07:52 PM

RADICAL, DUDE!
  • 0

hejda_zps6237a1e8.png

"I hate America" - Ariana Grande


#3 N7Nucks

N7Nucks

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,022 posts
  • Joined: 20-June 13

Posted 15 August 2013 - 01:34 AM

That'd definetly make for some interesting offensive set ups. Don't see it happening but still a very intriguing rule.
  • 0

#4 Ghostsof1915

Ghostsof1915

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 28,606 posts
  • Joined: 31-January 07

Posted 15 August 2013 - 02:41 AM

I thought you were going to say play without goalies.
  • 0
GO CANUCKS GO!
"The Canucks did not lose in 1994. They just ran out of time.." Barry MacDonald Team1040

Posted Image

#5 Henrik Kesler

Henrik Kesler

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,781 posts
  • Joined: 05-April 13

Posted 15 August 2013 - 06:21 AM

Interesting and somewhat realistic, but I don't like the one icing per PK rule.
  • 0

#6 Nuxfanabroad

Nuxfanabroad

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,502 posts
  • Joined: 10-May 07

Posted 15 August 2013 - 03:52 PM

I thought you were going to say play without goalies.



Yes, 'tenders drop their stick behind the goal, & rest their trapper on their noggin'.('til play starts)
  • 0

#7 BI3KSA-

BI3KSA-

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,472 posts
  • Joined: 27-June 11

Posted 19 August 2013 - 02:18 AM

The games in the Sharks series would have been all been something like 50-4 if they had this rule during last years playoffs.

Edited by Kesheniel, 19 August 2013 - 02:19 AM.

  • 0

#8 Edlerberry

Edlerberry

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,611 posts
  • Joined: 01-February 12

Posted 19 August 2013 - 09:12 AM

The games in the Sharks series would have been all been something like 50-4 if they had this rule during last years playoffs.


yes because the sharks would have scored over 2 times per powerplay
  • 0

Chopper-for-life-7-600x200.png

If we don't even dump one veteran, I'll stop posting on CDC until October 7th. It's that disappointing. - Tom Sestito, June 27th.


#9 BI3KSA-

BI3KSA-

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,472 posts
  • Joined: 27-June 11

Posted 19 August 2013 - 12:03 PM

yes because the sharks would have scored over 2 times per powerplay


Look up the word "hyperbole".
  • 0

#10 Spoosh

Spoosh

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,791 posts
  • Joined: 10-August 05

Posted 19 August 2013 - 01:25 PM

That'd definetly make for some interesting offensive set ups. Don't see it happening but still a very intriguing rule.


OP has a good idea here, but It will take ages for something like that to become reality imo. Nice of you to take time (probably more than a few minutes) to come up with the idea. I would never have thought of something like that. I kinda like it the way it is. The icing rule is maybe a bit too much...
  • 0

© 2000, 2015 K'Spoosh Entertainment Ltd.

Misuse of this almost copyrighted information will with near certainty lead to misuse of it.


SuomenLippu.gif


#11 peaches5

peaches5

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,689 posts
  • Joined: 24-June 13

Posted 19 August 2013 - 03:10 PM

Suggested this before..Stick a dot smack dab in the high slot, little higher, maybe-but between the two FO circles, in each team's end. Use it for pk icings(allow 1 icing per penalty); so defenders gotta' make a choice, whenever they get control. Also use this FO dot for icings in the last 2 minutes of any period. Lastly, give offensive teams a lot of creative-leeway in these FO-formations; but strictly enforce the defensive set-up for them. This makes late-period minutes more intense/interesting, while also highlighting the importance of good strategically-offensive coaching.


I've read some stupid things on here but this just might be the stupidest.
  • 0

#12 Nuxfanabroad

Nuxfanabroad

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,502 posts
  • Joined: 10-May 07

Posted 19 August 2013 - 03:31 PM

I've read some stupid things on here but this just might be the stupidest.

Hmm, perhaps your insights on the subject are shining rays beaming through the clouds? Enlighten us when you've time there, sunshine. It's interesting, what tech is doing to reasonable manners, isn't it?
  • 0

#13 Nuxfanabroad

Nuxfanabroad

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,502 posts
  • Joined: 10-May 07

Posted 25 August 2013 - 10:23 PM

C'mon, let's spice things up at the end of every period. It's entertainment, is it not?
  • 0

#14 n00bxQb

n00bxQb

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,004 posts
  • Joined: 05-July 09

Posted 25 August 2013 - 10:44 PM

The easiest solution is getting rid of offsides
  • 0





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.