avelanch Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 He is tied for the 2nd most goals of any rookie in the ECHL, and is tied for 16th overall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qwags Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 How old is Fox? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstank29 Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 How old is Fox? 21 his birthday is in Oct Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qwags Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 21 his birthday is in Oct Good. When people say that a player is over-aged and plays in the AHL or ECHL, I think that the player is around 25-26, you know, a player in his prime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avelanch Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 who said he is over-aged? he played one overage year (not over-aged, there is a difference) in the CHL last season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webster6 Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 C'mon man. A pp goal does not count towards a players +/- I had no idea it was a PP goal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 I had no idea it was a PP goal Elementary deduction, my dear Watson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HowYaDrouin Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 Not cdc but Travis Green said what I stated. Also, he is not ready to take a step because in a 4-1 game, where he scored a goal, he still managed to be a -1. 4-1 win? So he scored a goal which would give him a plus, and he was on the ice for one against. So it was the one and only goal against the K-Wings. Which means he couldn't have been no lower than even +/- Think your trolls through before you type them. Jesus... I think I felt my neurons dying reading that exchange. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webster6 Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 Elementary deduction, my dear Watson. Jesus... I think I felt my neurons dying reading that exchange. I know I'm asshat at times, but I don't remember when you two became ignorant. What part of "I had no idea it was a PP goal" were you not able to process? Going on his comment alone all the information I had was that a goal for and against while he was on the ice were scored. I mocked what seemed to be a miscalculation on his hand, but I just wasn't in the loop about it being a PPG. You wanna feel neurons die? Debate me on any intellectual subject and I'll make you feel stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HowYaDrouin Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 I know I'm asshat at times, but I don't remember when you two became ignorant. What part of "I had no idea it was a PP goal" were you not able to process? Going on his comment alone all the information I had was that a goal for and against while he was on the ice were scored. I mocked what seemed to be a miscalculation on his hand, but I just wasn't in the loop about it being a PPG. You wanna feel neurons die? Debate me on any intellectual subject and I'll make you feel stupid. If you would like to have an intellectual debate, then pick a subject my friend. You were mocking Desi for making a dumb statement, and we're mocking you for a dumb statement... You can't have it both ways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 I know I'm asshat at times, but I don't remember when you two became ignorant. What part of "I had no idea it was a PP goal" were you not able to process? Going on his comment alone all the information I had was that a goal for and against while he was on the ice were scored. I mocked what seemed to be a miscalculation on his hand, but I just wasn't in the loop about it being a PPG. You wanna feel neurons die? Debate me on any intellectual subject and I'll make you feel stupid. As I said, elementary deduction. If he was on the ice for a goal both for and against and yet was -1, it's quite simple to deduce his goal was scored on the PP as they don't count against +/-. Simple math. Frankly even Watson could have figure this one out without Sherlock's help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstank29 Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 As I said, elementary deduction. If he was on the ice for a goal both for and against and yet was -1, it's quite simple to deduce his goal was scored on the PP as they don't count against +/-. Simple math. Frankly even Desi or Canuktravella could have figure this one out without Sherlock's help. Fixed it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avelanch Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 Fixed it i'm not sure that fix rings true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted April 16, 2015 Share Posted April 16, 2015 ... You were mocking Desi for making a dumb statement, and we're mocking you for a dumb statement... You can't have it both ways. Yup, and I think we can end it there. Dane Fox anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dickie Posted April 18, 2015 Share Posted April 18, 2015 Dane Fox is gonna score 50 goals for the Canucks next year.... Right? Right?????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesB Posted April 18, 2015 Share Posted April 18, 2015 I think he will be in the AHL next year hopefully with Blomstrand as well. Maybe even Valk will be there? Things are going to be crowded in Utica. Don't forget Cole Cassels (although I think he has an outside chance to actually make the Canucks). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2SKATES1STICK Posted April 18, 2015 Share Posted April 18, 2015 You wanna feel neurons die? Debate me on any intellectual subject and I'll make you feel stupid. wouldn't an intellectual discussion in which you purport to know more than him cause him to make more neural connections as he is exposed to new information? unless you feel an intellectual discussion with you would provide him no new insight and his brain would atrophy during the session due to extreme boredom and disuse... in either case i question your reasoning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted April 29, 2015 Share Posted April 29, 2015 News1130 Sports @News1130Sports 3h 30 goals and forward Dane Fox was named the ECHL's Kalamazoo Wings rookie of the year. #Canucks Wings coach Nick Bootland tells me, Fox and Curtis Valk should move up to the AHL next year. #Canucks Valk missed the 2nd half of the season after ACL surgery - Bootland is a big fan of Valk's, loves his game. #Canucks There will be a lot of numbers with the Comets, so we'll see who moves up, but it was great to see Fox find his scoring touch later in the season in the ECHL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstank29 Posted April 29, 2015 Share Posted April 29, 2015 There will be a lot of numbers with the Comets, so we'll see who moves up, but it was great to see Fox find his scoring touch later in the season in the ECHL. Interesting, no mention of Blomstrand in that tweet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted April 29, 2015 Share Posted April 29, 2015 Maybe, maybe not. Depends on how and what questions News1130 asked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.