AriGold Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Bunch of goofs on twitter got CDC roaring high right now I see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grapefruits Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 How the hell does this work cap wise? Kane is making 5.2m.... Well according to cap geek we have 4.2 available and Tanev and Hansen make 2.85. So it is possible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
It's a process Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Done. Please let it be true even though it's not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebreh Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 must........not..........get.........excited! its bs its bs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunningWild Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Ok, were's the source people? Any time I see Tanevs name in a potential deal I want to smack my head against the counter. He's the teams 2nd best d-man. Hansen is this teams top 6 forward. Gaunce is a top 5 prospect. That's a lot to give up for a guy who is a top 6 foward and has attitude issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dragon4401 Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 I also swear it was all our top prospects... and our D is already a mess why would they trade away one of our two reliable D? I know if he does this there has to be a second or 3rd deal with some defence heading our way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
It's a process Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Ok, were's the source people? Any time I see Tanevs name in a potential deal I want to smack my head against the counter. He's the teams 2nd best d-man. Hansen is this teams top 6 forward. Gaunce is a top 5 prospect. That's a lot to give up for a guy who is a top 6 foward and has attitude issues. Lol Hansen a top 6 forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AppleJack Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Replace Tanev with someone else and I'd be game. I think it's a hoax though. Getting rid of Tanev at this point would be absurd. I'd cry if he left. We are a mess on D because of injuries. Tanev and Hammer are pretty much our most consistent D. If we lost one even for E.kane we would be in big trouble. I would cry super amount if he left. He's easily my 2nd favorite canuck...and I just brought my milionaire jersey into the team store to get number 8 on it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunningWild Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Lol Hansen a top 6 forward. "On this team", yes he is. He's been playing there for 90% of this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
It's a process Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 We are a mess on D because of injuries. Tanev and Hammer are pretty much our most consistent D. If we lost one even for E.kane we would be in big trouble. I would cry super amount if he left. He's easily my 2nd favorite canuck...and I just brought my milionaire jersey into the team store to get number 8 on it Logo on the front not the name on the back. Can't really get attached to players in this league since they come and go so often. It would hurt losing Tanev but if it's for a guy who can change a game with one play and be the present and future of your team, hell yes, count me in. Don't worry though this "rumour" is bs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BI3KSA- Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 I'd be baffled if this trade ever happened. Kane is worth a lot more than that and I'm sure many other teams would be willing to offer more. Only way I see this happening is if Kane demands a trade to here or some other extremely unlikely circumstance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.53 Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 switch Tanev with Corrado and it's a done deal. Optimaly I would try and do Hansen, Corrado, Jensen, and a second. Winnipeg gets a top 9 forward who has shown he can play anywhere up and down the line up. A good prospect capable of playing pretty well for an nhl club and has only shown sings of moving upwards, Jensen, who hasn't shown too much lately but I still think has enough potential to have value and a second instead of a third. I think that is fair enough value for Evander Kane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
It's a process Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 "On this team", yes he is. He's been playing there for 90% of this season. That's irrelevant. If Burrows is up he's playing on the 3rd line. You can't name him a top 6 forward just because he plays there. He's a 3rd liner playing on the 2nd line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strawberries Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Source?? No way were giving up Tanev uhh for evander kane in a heartbeat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twilight Sparkle Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Ok, were's the source people? Any time I see Tanevs name in a potential deal I want to smack my head against the counter. source: random jabroni who posts on twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AppleJack Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Logo on the front not the name on the back. Can't really get attached to players in this league since they come and go so often. It would hurt losing Tanev but if it's for a guy who can change a game with one play and be the present and future of your team, hell yes, count me in. Don't worry though this "rumour" is bs. I bleed green and blue, I am a die hard fan and will always cheer for the team first however I do not see the smarts in trading one of our only consistent D away (fav player or not) for a super star with an attitude problem. Do I want E.kane on this team- yes of course I do but that doesn't mean we should give away to much to get him. There have to be other options we could do- or why not send them someone else. It just doesn't make sense logically giving what the nucks need right now. We pretty much are bleeding D why give away one of our best? plus on a more selfish reason I haven't even got to wear my Tanev jersey yet. I haven't even got it yet. I litterly sent it to the team store on the weekend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dragon4401 Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Considering No reliable sources know anything about it id say false...Just a guy looking to stir the pot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Boudreau Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Seems feasible but highly unlikely. Those are the few guys the Canucks can actually move that don't have no-trades (Great job Gillis). Guance Tanev Hansen and a 3rd Seems very fair to me. Vancouver gets a legit top six power forward and Winnipeg gets Tanev a top 4 shutdown d-man. Hansen third line winger with the potential to move up. Guance third line checking center potential for more. When Kane is focused he has the speed and shot to be a game changer. Not to mention he can play physical and drop the gloves when necessary. Imagine the snipes he could have with the Sedins saucing him passes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunningWild Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 That's irrelevant. If Burrows is up he's playing on the 3rd line. You can't name him a top 6 forward just because he plays there. He's a 3rd liner playing on the 2nd line. It's relevant cause I said "on this team". Hansens played in a top 6 role for the majority of this season on this team. Is he a top 6 guy on most teams? Prob not, he's a tweener. But they're giving up a top dman, top prospect and a tp 6 guy (on this team), for a guy who will replace him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ossi Vaananen Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Eh, If I'm tracking this correctly it came from someone called Harry Niijar on Twitter, his handle: harry1619. It was later retweeted by Taj1944, and since picked up by Vancity buzz. The orginal source aparently started rumors of Parise coming here when he was a free agent. Take it with a mountain of salt. If it were true, it would suck to lose Tanev as he's our only stable D (Hammer has had troubles). I think Stanton still has room to grow, and Corrado might fill Tanev's void in the next 2 years. Getting Kane would be well worth it, even if it means Hansen and Gaunce. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.