Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

hsedin33

NASA Graphic Shows Six Terrifying Decades Of Global Warming, Also, Swedish Marines Dance Video

35 posts in this topic

http://www.huffingto...kusaolp00000009

NASA Graphic Shows Six Terrifying Decades Of Global Warming (VIDEO)

The Huffington Post | Posted: 01/25/2014 5:20 pm EST | Updated: 01/25/2014 5:59 pm EST

Despite the recent polar vortex and the efforts of some to suggest otherwise, global warming is happening. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and NASA have both said that the 10 warmest years in history happened since 2000. 97 percent of working climate scientists believe climate change is due to the actions of humans. And the risk to the planet is even greater than some scientists thought.

A visualization released Tuesday by NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, which monitors global surface temperatures, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gaJJtS_WDmI. But be warned, it's not comforting to watch.

---

Oh and Also:

http://www.huffingto...kusaolp00000009

Swedish Marines Lip-Sync 'Greased Lightning' And Change Your Life

The Huffington Post | Posted: 01/25/2014 11:58 am EST | Updated: 01/25/2014 11:59 am EST

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You do realize that NASA and NOAA are both government agencies right?

Now, what business are government agencies in again? Very good, they're in the business of getting more funding.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So according to the video...in 2013, the Arctic is blazing hot in comparison to California? I mean, red does mean hot right?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So according to the video...in 2013, the Arctic is blazing hot in comparison to California? I mean, red does mean hot right?

Its change in temperature.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So according to the video...in 2013, the Arctic is blazing hot in comparison to California? I mean, red does mean hot right?

What is begin shown is not the absolute temperature, but the temperature anomaly (i.e. how much warmer/colder a particular region is relative to the average of 1951-1980).

In 2013, the Arctic is a lot warmer than what it used to be, whereas California is warmer but not by as much.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You do realize that NASA and NOAA are both government agencies right?

Now, what business are government agencies in again? Very good, they're in the business of getting more funding.

Its not like 97% of all scientists are suddenly going to forego science for no good reason.

The scientific method dictates that science absolutely must be 100% objective or its useless.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just look at the scale and use it as a reference point. One degree change makes the colour change all the way from neutral to orange or neutral to blue.

Nothing saying there's absolutely no need for concern, but if they changed it to 2 degrees, the colours wouldn't have changed much and the exaggeration would be minimal.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just look at the scale and use it as a reference point. One degree change makes the colour change all the way from neutral to orange or neutral to blue.

Nothing saying there's absolutely no need for concern, but if they changed it to 2 degrees, the colours wouldn't have changed much and the exaggeration would be minimal.

I dunno man, raising the entire Earth's temperature by one or two degree's in 60 years seems kind of significant.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dunno man, raising the entire Earth's temperature by one or two degree's in 60 years seems kind of significant.

So 60 years? About the same time Nukes started getting tested on a regular basis. The same time when cancer started becoming more predominant. Something tells me there is more to this story.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not like 97% of all scientists are suddenly going to forego science for no good reason.

The scientific method dictates that science absolutely must be 100% objective or its useless.

and yet most reports and studies are completely biased going in, hunting for a certain viewpoint, and when that viewpoint is not proved either the data is manipulated , dropped, or explained away.

saying scientists are 100% objective is just foolish.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You do realize that NASA and NOAA are both government agencies right?

Now, what business are government agencies in again? Very good, they're in the business of getting more funding.

OK, now present some evidence that actually shows that NASA and NOAA are fabricating evidence to get more funding.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Artificial Atmospheric Renewers need to start being produced on a global scale. Since we cut down vast sections of the natural ones.

Technology has gotten us into this mess, it seems fitting that it should also be the solution.

carbonengineering1.jpg

energy-carbon-capture-technologies-artificial-trees_38796_600x450.jpg

Actually some of the Technology already implemented is far superior to the Carbon storing ability of trees. NASA and NOAA should be receiving vast sums of funds (directly out of the pockets of major Oil Corporations and logging interests) to implement these Carbon sinks on a global level.

The scariest part of this is that they release a Video like this with no viable plan to alter it. Obviously they have known that this is going on for decades. We are still going to use Carbon fuels for the foreseeable future so we must work within these parameters to solve the situation.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You do realize that NASA and NOAA are both government agencies right?

Now, what business are government agencies in again? Very good, they're in the business of getting more funding.

err what? isn't it the opposite? the government is trying to deny that global warming exist because it would cost them a lot of money and changes to fix the problem. They had been trying to preach to idiots that global warming doesn't exist and people are buying it for years.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The responses in the thread are just as terrifying

Ayyupp

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Warmer summers and winters, count me in...

The ignorance is strong in you.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.