billabong Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 Pretty simple really, after hearing the Canucks aren't going for rentals this year and if they were to make a move it would be for youth. Lebrun reported that edlers name is an interesting one because there would be about 10 teams interested in his services. I know he a has a NTC but the question still stands, will he stay or will he go? Personally, I honestly think he will get dealt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
It's a process Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 Hope so. Hamhuis needs to go instead. Edler is a stud!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
33HankandDank22 Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 I kind of hope so, but no, because everyone knows Gillis can't pull the trigger on a big move. edit: but *yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRussianRocket. Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 Hope so. Hamhuis needs to go instead. Edler is a stud!!!! Disregard sarcasm people and keep on moving... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pouria Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 Edler for ROR is what I propose. Maybe Edler for Wayne Simmonds and Read Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chauncey Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 Pretty simple really, after hearing the Canucks aren't going for rentals this year and if they were to make a move it would be for youth. Lebrun reported that edlers name is an interesting one because there would be about 10 teams interested in his services. I know he a has a NTC but the question still stands, will he stay or will he go? Personally, I honestly think he will get dealt It's possible. That's for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Time Lord Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 Hamhuis, Stanton, and Tanev must stay. Probably Bieksa as well since he's one of the leaders on the team. That leaves just Edler and Garrison who might go, seeing as we are retooling. I personally wouldn't mind if Edler stayed, but if he has enough value, we should trade him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanKeslord17 Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 Disregard sarcasm people and keep on moving... LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lockhart Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 I'd rather target a young winger like E.Kane than ROR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 I'd rather target a young winger like E.Kane than ROR. With Santo and Kes being able to play RW moving Kes to Sedins line and having ROR Higs and Santo is a pretty deadly line. If we could snag Kane for cheap, a lot of proposals have us getting wrecked, I'd like E. kane with Kes and Santo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herberts Vasiljevs Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 Edler for ROR is what I propose. Maybe Edler for Wayne Simmonds and Read I don't think the Flyers would want to move Simmonds. He has been one of their MVPs this season and is a big reason why the Flyers are still in the thick of things. However, if Edler is indeed put on the market we could get a lot for him because there are so many teams that can use him. Imagine if we were able to lure Couturier and Coburn out of Philly for Edler (and maybe something else). I think we could get maximum value out of Edler at the deadline. Like I said, a lot of teams would need his services. Detroit would be all over Edler too. Edler for Danny DeKeyser, Tomas Jurco and Joakim Andersson would instantly add some more young bodies to a team that is still competitive. That type of trade I would do in a heartbeat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Singh Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 Hope so. Hamhuis needs to go instead. :picard: :picard: :picard: :picard: :picard: it won't let me put any more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keccles Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 If we get anything close to whats being suggested on this topic I'll be in shock. I'll be ecstatic, but in shock. I'v never seen a player who can be the best player on the ice any given night, but most nights he's one of the worst. Sure he has offensive upside but defensively he just isn't good on a nightly basis. People always talk about his size but he does not use it. Edler needs to go and he needs to go now. I agree his value is still relatively high but I only see it going down from here. Then it will be difficult to get rid of that contract. Does anyone actually watch him on a nightly basis and say to themselves, "Yes I'm glad he's a Canuck for 5 more years!". How Could you? Honestly. As for the NTC, I get the feeling he doesn't give a crap where he plays because thats how he plays. Please Gillis do it now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VIC_CITY Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 This is getting ridiculous!! WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME A PLAYER PLAYING FOR A PLAYOFF TEAM WAIVED THEIR NTC MID-SEASON? Oh I don't know....how about NEVER!! If I see another Edler/Booth trade thread I'm gonna lose my mind! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradin123 Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 This is getting ridiculous!! WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME A PLAYER PLAYING FOR A PLAYOFF TEAM WAIVED THEIR NTC MID-SEASON? Oh I don't know....how about NEVER!! If I see another Edler/Booth trade thread I'm gonna lose my mind! By the trade deadline comes it is unlikely The Canucks will be in a playoff spot. Phoenix is going to pass the Canucks soon for the 8 seed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradin123 Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 Edler for ROR is what I propose. Maybe Edler for Wayne Simmonds and Read I seriously doubt Colorado would do that. Edler just isn't performing up to his contract right now and that is what a lot of people are failing to acccount for in these trade scenarios. The Canucks fans opinion of Edler is funny. The majority of Canucks fans don't like him and think losing him would be no big deal but a lot of those same people think others teams will give up top players for him. I really don't think the Canucks could get much back for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 I think he'll get dealt for nothing short of an overpayment just before the deadline. This is getting ridiculous!! WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME A PLAYER PLAYING FOR A PLAYOFF TEAM WAIVED THEIR NTC MID-SEASON? Oh I don't know....how about NEVER!! If I see another Edler/Booth trade thread I'm gonna lose my mind! Marian Gaborik Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Sestito Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 the fact that all of the [proposals on this forum are Edler for O'reilly proposals should be a signal that he's A. underperforming B. fans hate him It's also a sign that A. if we are begging for this deal, and avs fans are completely opposed to it, it's not going to happen. B. pls Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred65 Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 Edler for Evander Kane. Both make similar money for similar periods and Kane has out stayed his welcome in Winnipeg ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Sestito Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 Marian Gaborik He was relegated to the third line in NY. Edler continues to get top minutes in one of the best cities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.