J529 Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 Listening to Dan Russell's show last night and they were discussing if Lack doesn't show more in the remainder of the season, they will go out and sign a veteran and Lack will go back to being backup next season. If this happens, it looks even more stupid and foolish trading off both Schneider and Lui. Total incompetence by Gillis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanKeslord17 Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 Or maybe it will put pressure on Lack to perform and we have another goalie to put in when Lack gets hosed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmilyM Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 Was this speculation or was this cited from a source within the organization? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neversummer Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 That would have been my guess without anyone having to say it. Common sense, no?You mean if Lack showed that he was inconsistent while he plays the role of Batman, you'd still name him the unquestioned starter for 2014? Any PeeWee coach would have been able to come to this conclusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMapleLaughs Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 Was this speculation or was this cited from a source within the organization?What do you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jägermeister Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 Thats more of a suggestion or an idea than a rumour or anything even remotely credible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aladeen Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 Listening to Dan Russell's show last night and they were discussing if Lack doesn't show more in the remainder of the season, they will go out and sign a veteran and Lack will go back to being backup next season. If this happens, it looks even more stupid and foolish trading off both Schneider and Lui. Total incompetence by Gillis. Ignorant Thread, Lack has been great for a rookie coming in to the situation he did. Lack is the furthest thing from this team's problem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LM11 Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 I don't think he will be the sole number 1. My guess is that they'll get someone to share the load next season so Eddie can keep improving without putting too much pressure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonny_Bohonos_14 Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 Jacob Markstrom or Joacim Eriksson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogbyte Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 Halak Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sultan of Sarcasm Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 Well, as long as Mr. "I love the Canucks!" Dan Russell says so, it MUST be true. I think the team will be focused elsewhere and will roll the dice with Lack and Markstrom. If it isn't working, they can try to find a goalie via trade. Truly, there are bigger fish to fry this off season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanucksSayEh Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 He will be fine, believe in LACK! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c00kies Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 Vokoun might be available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 Halak Seems like the most likely guy to sign, but then where does that leave Markstrom? Back in the AHL? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMapleLaughs Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 I hope one day this town will get over it's goaltender complex. The media hammering this drivel out here day after day doesn't help though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J529 Posted March 17, 2014 Author Share Posted March 17, 2014 Well, as long as Mr. "I love the Canucks!" Dan Russell says so, it MUST be true. I think the team will be focused elsewhere and will roll the dice with Lack and Markstrom. If it isn't working, they can try to find a goalie via trade. Truly, there are bigger fish to fry this off season. Pretty unfair to throw Lack in there the way they have and potentially ruin his development, especially with the whole Heritage Classic debacle and how the crowd was on him. Think it's very foolish to go with two very young and inexperienced goalies. Makes all the sense to bring in a veteran to help mentor Lack. Dan Russell tells it like it is, unlike tools and yes man at 1040 who do nothing but make every inconceivable excuse for Canucks and Gillis. Why do you find it so hard to believe this could happen? Especially when both Schneider and Luo have been both traded off for pretty much nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rypien37 Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 Dan Russell LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J529 Posted March 17, 2014 Author Share Posted March 17, 2014 Dan Russell LOL 1040 LOL. Go listen to your fan boys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 A shared #1 position would be best for Lack. Someone like Halak would be perfect to bring him along. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AntonRodin Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 I Love Lack but Markstrom is a stud hell be our #1 next year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.