5Fivehole0 Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 To TorontoCorrado + 3rd pickTo VancouverReimerThoughts? Could we just do Corrado for Reimer?? What do you think it would take to get Reimer? He is a great goalie... Doesn't deserve to be a back up. Maybe trade Lack straight across? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 Why would we trade lack hes awesome go back to kindergarden Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 Wrong forum. Bad ideas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 why would we trade for a upcoming ufa? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5Fivehole0 Posted March 21, 2014 Author Share Posted March 21, 2014 Why would we trade lack hes awesome go back to kindergardenWell, so glad you have such an intelligent piece to add, but maybe next time... don't.As for Lack, he's good, not great. Don't kid yourself and think he is better than Luongo... Since Lu left Lacks stats have gone down sharply. I believe he's at .915% and 2.32 GAA. Not bad at all. But not amazing by any means. Also, since Lack took over as the starter he has had a 3.3 GAA and .876 sv%Reimer has put up similar numbers on a team with swiss cheese for defence. I think he would be easy to steal from Toronto and fit well in Vancouver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5Fivehole0 Posted March 21, 2014 Author Share Posted March 21, 2014 Wrong forum.Bad ideas.yea, my bad, wrong forum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 yea, my bad, wrong forum No big deal. I like Reimer, but I wouldn't give up Corrado, let alone add a pick. If the Canucks hadn't landed Markstrom and didn't have such a talented group of young Swedish tenders, he'd be a pretty good option. If the price were low enough, perhaps, but I'd certainly offer them nothing but a lowball. I don't think Toronto will be able to get much for him - not only are they running him down publicly, as Carlyle is prone to do, but they're also in a tenuous RFA situation with him, where he might decide to go the way of the offersheet considering not only Carlyle's comments, but the marginal role he's likely to play there in the future with Bernier being given the starting role. Toronto is also in a bit of a contract pickle this coming summer. They've gone on a drunken spending spree, and they have a boatload of players to re-sign or lose. I'd guess that he's going to want out, and at best they'll be able to get a 2nd or 3rd - in the range of RFA offersheet compensation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MayRayDown Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 why would we trade for a upcoming ufa? rfa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lockhart Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 We already have enough backup goalies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold Hard Truth Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 leafs troll =op Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caboose Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 No big deal. I like Reimer, but I wouldn't give up Corrado, let alone add a pick. If the Canucks hadn't landed Markstrom and didn't have such a talented group of young Swedish tenders, he'd be a pretty good option. If the price were low enough, perhaps, but I'd certainly offer them nothing but a lowball. I don't think Toronto will be able to get much for him - not only are they running him down publicly, as Carlyle is prone to do, but they're also in a tenuous RFA situation with him, where he might decide to go the way of the offersheet considering not only Carlyle's comments, but the marginal role he's likely to play there in the future with Bernier being given the starting role. Toronto is also in a bit of a contract pickle this coming summer. They've gone on a drunken spending spree, and they have a boatload of players to re-sign or lose. I'd guess that he's going to want out, and at best they'll be able to get a 2nd or 3rd - in the range of RFA offersheet compensation. I'd be happy to get a 2nd to replace the one we moved in the Holland trade for Reimer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 I'd be happy to get a 2nd to replace the one we moved in the Holland trade for Reimer. Probably wouldn't mind having a backup like Scrivens back either? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caboose Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 Probably wouldn't mind having a backup like Scrivens back either? #GarretSparks2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheXFactor Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 Well, so glad you have such an intelligent piece to add, but maybe next time... don't. As for Lack, he's good, not great. Don't kid yourself and think he is better than Luongo... Since Lu left Lacks stats have gone down sharply. I believe he's at .915% and 2.32 GAA. Not bad at all. But not amazing by any means. Also, since Lack took over as the starter he has had a 3.3 GAA and .876 sv% Reimer has put up similar numbers on a team with swiss cheese for defence. I think he would be easy to steal from Toronto and fit well in Vancouver. Are you serious? Lack is playing very well considering how many times our defense fails. Also your comparing Luongo's CAREER to Lack's first year as starter with a team that has been playing incredibly bad this year. Frankly a 3.3 GAA and .876 sv% isn't bad all things considering. Our first priority should be developing prospects and improving offense, not trading our up and coming goalies. Reimer is good but he's not enough of an upgrade over our current goalies. Why trade Corrado? He's a part of our future and potentially a top 4 Dman. Keep him unless some team is stupid enough to make a trade where we'd win by a landslide. Note: My opinion does not factor in potential derps Gillis might do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagori78 Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 Thats an awesome idea. Reimer is way better in NHL14; it even says in the game that Lack is just a backup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
messier's_elbow Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 Toronto fans are crazy. They think Kessel is as good as Crosby. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slappipappi Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 No big deal. I like Reimer, but I wouldn't give up Corrado, let alone add a pick. You wouldn't give up a 5-6 ceiling d-man for a potential #1 goalie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 You wouldn't give up a 5-6 ceiling d-man for a potential #1 goalie? I don't think you know Corrado's ceiling, and the Canucks don't need a #1 goalie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CookieCrumbs Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 Trolling? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadOgre Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 I don't know probably wouldn't hurt to grab him on offer sheet. low offer sheet. leafs would probably nix that just to say screw you. so that would be fun lol. I think there is tremendous upside on lack probably the same with Markstrom. I'm just curious if anyone thinks he would bring some garbage baggage with him or not ? I think Nux should focus more on upgrading our defensemen ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.