Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Nick Ritchie] Junior Point totals vs Getzlaf, Lucic, and Nash


Merci

Recommended Posts

I wouldnt trade up. Ritchie is just who I like most at 6th spot. If one of the other top 5 fall, or we scouted Ehlers or Virtanen a ton and figure them a cant miss id be ok with that. Ritchie just seems like a bit better prospect then the other 3 or 4 guys after the top 5 to me. Big body guy with hands and vision. Having quick acceleration is always nice to have especially for a guy his size. He could look great with Horvat and Kassian on a line, in a year or two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This guy could be a potential 3-4th line checker, can't draft a guy like this 6th overall. He's got Alex Stonanov written all over him

Some scouts may disagree, some may think he has the carriage of a NHLer right now

NHL Prospect Hot List:

When Ritchie goes into beast mode, it’s tough to stop the young winger. At 6-foot-3 and 229 pounds, he’s

got the carriage to be an NHLer right now, but the Petes are happy he’s still with them. The power forward

had two goals and a helper in Peterborough’s shocking come-from-behind Game 6 win over Kingston, a game in

which the Petes trailed 3-0 before Ritchie got the 5-4 comeback started.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This guy could be a potential 3-4th line checker, can't draft a guy like this 6th overall. He's got Alex Stonanov written all over him

mean while, Ehlers have Nikita Filatov written all over him. literally. Same height, feather weight, highly skilled, Filatov was competing to get drafted number 1.

Trade up to take Ritchie? Now I've seen it all.

You've seen nothing yet. The ones with the Ehlers erections said he's a mix of Markus Naslund and Pavel Bure.

Bring it on. sick and tired of the Ritchie Nay Sayers talking out of their ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, the most I have seen Kass lose a battle along the boards in a game was three times... But that was in the preseason against Edmonton, where he was still a few steps behind.

no need for the shot at the end though.

Perhaps you would like to re visit the comment he made in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mean while, Ehlers have Nikita Filatov written all over him. literally. Same height, feather weight, highly skilled, Filatov was competing to get drafted number 1.

You've seen nothing yet. The ones with the Ehlers erections said he's a mix of Markus Naslund and Pavel Bure.

Bring it on. sick and tired of the Ritchie Nay Sayers talking out of their ass.

Do you have a source for this? They arent anything alike other than how tall and how much they weigh. Their personalities and approach to the guy are polar opposites. You cant just pick out a bust player and claim the guy is like that just because its what you want to believe.

The ironic thing about your post is you go on to claim the Ritchie 'naysayers' are doing.............exactly what you just did in your post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some scouts may disagree, some may think he has the carriage of a NHLer right now

NHL Prospect Hot List:

When Ritchie goes into beast mode, it’s tough to stop the young winger. At 6-foot-3 and 229 pounds, he’s

got the carriage to be an NHLer right now, but the Petes are happy he’s still with them. The power forward

had two goals and a helper in Peterborough’s shocking come-from-behind Game 6 win over Kingston, a game in

which the Petes trailed 3-0 before Ritchie got the 5-4 comeback started.

this is true. He is a power winger who would excel af forechecking.

Unfortunately, he does not play consistently. His focus wanders . He can work on that to improve his intensity. However, the NHL is getting faster. The game is increasingly about speed and skill. It believe its a mistake to draft a player who is primarily touted for his size in the top 10.

Guys like Draisaitl and Dal Colle have size, but can also score at an elite level .These are the size guys you want to pursue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mean while, Ehlers have Nikita Filatov written all over him. literally. Same height, feather weight, highly skilled, Filatov was competing to get drafted number 1.

You've seen nothing yet. The ones with the Ehlers erections said he's a mix of Markus Naslund and Pavel Bure.

Bring it on. sick and tired of the Ritchie Nay Sayers talking out of their ass.

He is actually a better player at 17 than Naslund was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ranking the Potential Franchise Players in the 2014 NHL Draft By Allan Mitchell , Featured Columnist Apr 29, 2014

10. Nick Ritchie, LW, Peterborough Petes (OHL)
hi-res-7607d76543aaaea1633a26e0d7cf0a0d_
Claus Andersen/Getty Images

Nick Ritchie

The Stats: 61GP, 39-35-74 with Peterborough Petes (OHL)

The Story: Mike Davies of the Peterborough Examiner tell us about Ritchie's talents and quotes Dallas Stars scout J.J. Johnson on Ritchie. Johnston says Ritchie has all the tools for the pro game.

What Makes Him Special? Ritchie is one of the best power-forward prospects in the draft. Dan Stewart, scouting director for future considerations, tells the story to OHL Prospects:

I have been to games this season where he looks like the undisputed top prospect for this draft. A real bull in a china shop who can force his will on anyone physically as well as possessing the offensive skills to singlehandedly dominate the game and carry the Petes to victory, and then some games where he looks disinterested and played like a real dog. Partly due to improved health but lately his contributions and efforts have been more consistent which has his stock rising. Think physical dominance like Milan Lucic but with better offensive abilities (shot, hands, sense).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ranking the Potential Franchise Players in the 2014 NHL Draft By Allan Mitchell , Featured Columnist Apr 29, 2014

10. Nick Ritchie, LW, Peterborough Petes (OHL)
hi-res-7607d76543aaaea1633a26e0d7cf0a0d_
Claus Andersen/Getty Images

Nick Ritchie

The Stats: 61GP, 39-35-74 with Peterborough Petes (OHL)

The Story: Mike Davies of the Peterborough Examiner tell us about Ritchie's talents and quotes Dallas Stars scout J.J. Johnson on Ritchie. Johnston says Ritchie has all the tools for the pro game.

What Makes Him Special? Ritchie is one of the best power-forward prospects in the draft. Dan Stewart, scouting director for future considerations, tells the story to OHL Prospects:

I have been to games this season where he looks like the undisputed top prospect for this draft. A real bull in a china shop who can force his will on anyone physically as well as possessing the offensive skills to singlehandedly dominate the game and carry the Petes to victory, and then some games where he looks disinterested and played like a real dog. Partly due to improved health but lately his contributions and efforts have been more consistent which has his stock rising. Think physical dominance like Milan Lucic but with better offensive abilities (shot, hands, sense).

5. Nikolaj Ehlers, LW, Halifax Mooseheads (QMJHL)
5. Nikolaj Ehlers, LW, Halifax Mooseheads hi-res-56b8fdeef1c95fb6a149bed82a8e9c0a_
Derek Leung/Getty Images

Nikolaj Ehlers

The Stats: 63GP, 49-55-104 with Halifax Mooseheads (QMJHL)

The Story: Ehlers may be the most exciting offensive player in the draft. His numbers are among the best in this group, and his style points are spectacular. He is an impact offensive prospect.

What Makes Him Special? Ehlers is quick, intelligent and creative. Ryan Kennedy from the Hockey News puts it this way:

An incredibly skilled forward, Ehlers makes plays at high speeds and doesn’t mind going to the tough areas in order to score. Scouts see him as an excellent complementary player and have even hesitantly brought up teammate Jonathan Drouin as a comparable, as lofty as that sounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats Nick Ritchie laying out Alex Peters and Connor Bleakley the other pictures are Ehlers getting man handled by Aaron Irving and creamed by Haydn Fleury :bigblush:
1297514820066_ORIGINAL.jpg?quality=80&si

5. Nikolaj Ehlers, LW, Halifax Mooseheads (QMJHL)

5. Nikolaj Ehlers, LW, Halifax Mooseheads

hi-res-56b8fdeef1c95fb6a149bed82a8e9c0a_

Derek Leung/Getty Images

Nikolaj Ehlers

The Stats: 63GP, 49-55-104 with Halifax Mooseheads (QMJHL)

The Story: Ehlers may be the most exciting offensive player in the draft. His numbers are among the best in this group, and his style points are spectacular. He is an impact offensive prospect.

What Makes Him Special? Ehlers is quick, intelligent and creative. Ryan Kennedy from the Hockey News puts it this way:

An incredibly skilled forward, Ehlers makes plays at high speeds and doesn’t mind going to the tough areas in order to score. Scouts see him as an excellent complementary player and have even hesitantly brought up teammate Jonathan Drouin as a comparable, as lofty as that sounds.

1297514819878_ORIGINAL.jpg?quality=80&si

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats Nick Ritchie laying out Alex Peters and Connor Bleakley the other pictures are Ehlers getting man handled by Aaron Irving and creamed by Haydn Fleury :bigblush:

1297514820066_ORIGINAL.jpg?quality=80&si

1297514819878_ORIGINAL.jpg?quality=80&si

That first pic looks like Ritchie is a danger to his own player :bigblush: and Ehlers is number 5 in the writers ranking while Ritchie just make his list at number 10. :bigblush: I really do not care who we take, thought it was funny you used this article to try and prove something about Ritchie when that writer has Ehlers higher on his list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since I was asked…. though not too politely….

Conclusion: Ritchie has little difference in level of production regardless of the quality of competition.

Goals Vs Top 6 Teams ( Guelph, Erie, London, Sault Ste Marie, Oshawa, Kingston) = 14

Goals Vs Bottom 6 Teams ( Sarnia, Kitchener, Ottawa, Belleville, Mississauga, Niagara) = 16

2013-09-19 KGN@PBO 2. PBO N. Ritchie, (1) (S. Pierog, S. Varga), 17:05

2013-09-26 PLY@PBO 2. PBO N. Ritchie, (2) (A. Stefano, J. Maguire), 6:18

2013-09-26 PLY@PBO 2. PBO N. Ritchie, (3) (J. Tanus, E. Cornel), 15:53 (PP)

2013-09-27 PBO@KIT 1. PBO N. Ritchie, (4) (M. Clarke, N. Armstrong), 15:57 (PP)

2013-09-27 PBO@KIT 2. PBO N. Ritchie, (5) (N. Armstrong), 15:23 (PP)

2013-10-17 MISS@PBO 2. PBO N. Ritchie, (6) (E. Cornel, J. Tanus), 11:52

2013-11-07 KIT@PBO 1. PBO N. Ritchie, (7) (N. Armstrong), 0:21

2013-11-07 KIT@PBO 1. PBO N. Ritchie, (8) (S. Pierog), 13:50 (SH)

2013-11-08 PBO@ SBY 1. PBO N. Ritchie, (9) (E. Cornel, J. Tanus), 8:49 (PP)

2013-11-09 PBO@SSM 1. PBO N. Ritchie, (10) (J. MacDonald), 7:33

2013-11-15 PBO@GUE 1. PBO N. Ritchie, (11) (N. Armstrong), 3:30

2013-11-16 WSR@PBO 2. PBO N. Ritchie, (12) (E. Cornel, B. Devlin), 17:18 (PP)

2013-11-23 NIAG@PBO 3. PBO N. Ritchie, (13) , 19:51 (EN)

2013-11-28 BELV@PBO 1. PBO N. Ritchie, (14) (M. Clarke, J. Tanus), 2:02 (PP)

2013-11-30 LDN@PBO 3. PBO N. Ritchie, (15) (C. Seymour, S. Varga), 7:10

2013-12-28 OSH@PBO 2. PBO N. Ritchie, (16) (J. MacDonald), 7:29

2014-01-02 BAR@PBO 2. PBO N. Ritchie, (17) , 4:56 (PS)

2014-01-02 BAR@PBO 3. PBO N. Ritchie, (18) (C. Boland), 13:05

2014-01-11 NB@PBO 2. PBO N. Ritchie, (19) (H. Garlent, E. Cornel), 4:24

2014-01-23 SBY@PBO 1. PBO N. Ritchie, (20) (H. Garlent, C. Seymour), 17:38 (PP)

2014-01-30 OTT@PBO 2. PBO N. Ritchie, (21) (M. Clarke, H. Garlent), 11:49

2014-01-30 OTT@PBO 3. PBO N. Ritchie, (22) (E. Cornel), 8:24

2014-01-30 OTT@PBO 3. PBO N. Ritchie, (23) (N. Armstrong, A. Stefano), 10:42 (PP)

2014-02-04 PBO@OTT 1. PBO N. Ritchie, (24) (A. Stefano), 15:27

2014-02-07 PBO@KGN 1. PBO N. Ritchie, (25) (E. Cornel, H. Garlent), 1:13 (PP)

2014-02-07 PBO@KGN 2. PBO N. Ritchie, (26) (E. Cornel), 7:53

2014-02-07 PBO@KGN 2. PBO N. Ritchie, (27) (E. Cornel), 9:14 (PP)

2014-02-07 PBO@KGN 2. PBO N. Ritchie, (28) (C. Boland), 17:26

2014-02-07 PBO@KGN 3. PBO N. Ritchie, (29) (E. Cornel), 14:53

2014-02-13 BELV@PBO 2. PBO N. Ritchie, (30) (B. Devlin, N. Armstrong), 19:17 (PP)

2014-02-20 SAG@PBO 3. PBO N. Ritchie, (31) (M. Clarke, J. MacDonald), 19:20 (EN)

2014-02-21 PBO@MISS 2. PBO N. Ritchie, (32) (E. Cornel, H. Garlent), 9:53

2014-02-27 OSH@PBO 3. PBO N. Ritchie, (33) , 19:58 (EN)

2014-03-01 PBO@SAR OT. N. Ritchie, (34) (E. Cornel, B. Devlin), 0:46

2014-03-02 PBO@LDN 3. PBO N. Ritchie, (35) (J. Tanus), 18:18 (EN)

2014-03-06 KGN@PBO 1. PBO N. Ritchie, (36) (H. Garlent), 6:31

2014-03-06 KGN@PBO OT. PBO N. Ritchie, (37) , 0:31

2014-03-08 OTT@PBO 1. PBO N. Ritchie, (38) (H. Garlent), 13:18

2014-03-11 NIAG@PBO 3. PBO N. Ritchie, (39) (B. Devlin, S. Varga), 19:49 (EN)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adrian Kempe will be more productive than Ritchie or Virtanen. Kempe is only 17 yet playing against men, Kempe's transition to the NHL will be quicker than these two, he may very well be the best all round p.f in this draft, but I still wouldn't take him at 6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...