Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Nicklas Bo Hunter said:

Virtanen is proven yet plays on the 4th line while Eriksson is on the 1st line...

Eriksson doesn’t play with me...  :)

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So when Rick Dhaliwal and James Cybulski both state that Tryamkin cannot play this year in the NHL CDC calls them idiots but then they'll link some no name twitter account just to support their fantasy.  

 

 

1 hour ago, Me_ said:

No one says Tryammin is a saviour.

 

But he’s got a barely legal nasty to him that only Chara comes close to in today’s NHL. Not in points. But in nasty.

Yeah they are, heck you're even doing it on the second part of your post.  Tryamkin is some beast defender that only Chara comes close too?  That's not his mentality and you're setting yourself up for disappointment.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, redhdlois said:

 

There's not much point in repeatedly parroting some media tweet, as if that must be conclusive. A few years ago, I would have accepted a Dhaliwal tweet as fact, but since he transitioned from being a sports journalist to being a "personality" his credibility has declined dramatically.

  • Hydration 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Bottom line, can Tryamkin play this year or no? Us fans who love Tryamkin have been waiting for years, literally. This is just torture if it’s true, he can not play this year.

Edited by #Canucks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, redhdlois said:

 

Repeatedly quoting the same tweet that has already been put on here and discussed is entirely useless and annoying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Provost said:

Repeatedly quoting the same tweet that has already been put on here and discussed is entirely useless and annoying.

Nah it's been 10 pages of useless hype and bashing reputable media personalities because CDC doesn't want to accept the fact that Tryamkin cannot play in the NHL this year - it's effin pathetic.  

Edited by Tre Mac
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Here’s the Group 2 Free agency clause.

Remember Niks first SPC was signed as a 21yr old with us.

Apparently he needs 3 years of “professional play” to qualify as a Group 2 F/A.

.. but the question is,  is that with the NHL only?
 

 

672438D7-5095-4B78-B85B-C2C55F03F82B.jpeg
 

The other thing to note is that as a player from the KHL there is no transfer agreement stopping him from being signed to the NHL.

He has only need be released by his KHL team to be able to sign at any time to the NHL.

 

 

D6C71AB6-0444-4D65-8321-22AD4779A059.jpeg

Edited by SilentSam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, WeneedLumme said:

There's not much point in repeatedly parroting some media tweet, as if that must be conclusive. A few years ago, I would have accepted a Dhaliwal tweet as fact, but since he transitioned from being a sports journalist to being a "personality" his credibility has declined dramatically.

What has Rick Dhaliwal been wrong about?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Tre Mac said:

Nah it's been 10 pages of useless hype and bashing reputable media personalities because CDC doesn't want to accept the fact that Tryamkin cannot play in the NHL this year - it's effin pathetic.  

LOL no doubt, seems like everybody in CDC is an insider or a scout just because they got google. Rick Dhaliwal is one of the more credible sources, if he says something, theres weight to it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Alflives said:

One (the Edler deal) is supposition.  The Tryamkin issue is contract rules.  

True. Just wanted to answer poster with an example of why many seem to feel Dhaliwals credibility has fallen, myself included. In the Edler case he was either being played by the agent or just reporting misc speculations that all turned out to be far from the truth. Not a good look, anyway you see it.

 

I don't know that he's been wrong in any more factual matters, so I agree there's a difference, but at least for me I no longer trust that he knows what he's tweeting about and that he's not just repeating what some other source has told him.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, J-P said:

True. Just wanted to answer poster with an example of why many seem to feel Dhaliwals credibility has fallen, myself included. In the Edler case he was either being played by the agent or just reporting misc speculations that all turned out to be far from the truth. Not a good look, anyway you see it.

 

I don't know that he's been wrong in any more factual matters, so I agree there's a difference, but at least for me I no longer trust that he knows what he's tweeting about and that he's not just repeating what some other source has told him.

Agreed.  When reporters become puppets for GMs and Agents to spread their propaganda, they become simply writers.  They lose credibility for sure.  Still like Dhaliwal though.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Alflives said:

Agreed.  When reporters become puppets for GMs and Agents to spread their propaganda, they become simply writers.  They lose credibility for sure.  Still like Dhaliwal though.  

I will definitely forgive him if he's wrong on this one though - that would mean Big Nik is coming!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.