Ghostsof1915 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 To Edmonton: Jensen, Andersson, the rights to Eriksson, and our 4th rounder for 2015 2nd and 3rd rounder. Rationale: Jensen has size, something a lot of Oilers don't have, and speed. He would probably fit the Oilers style a lot better than ours. They get to keep their first rounder, they also get a player who's pretty much NHL ready (compared to a lot of Oiler picks that get thrown to the wolves). They get to sign Eriksson and he can probably get the back up gig at worst, at best he can push Scrivens. Andersson to help on their backend. They get help they need and keep their 1st rounder. The risk of course is he could light it up with the Oilers and make us pay. However we get a high 2nd and 3rd and a better pick than the ones we traded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRAZY_4_NAZZY Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Im not ready to give up on Jensen yet. He is having a below average season but I think he has more to show. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thejazz97 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 As much as I want to keep Jensen - I keep feeling like he's a Voracek-type player, a late bloomer - I kind of want to do this deal. We'd actually make something off of Eriksson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithers joe Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 a kassian trade might net us a late 1st or 2nd rounder....lack would maybe get us a 2nd rounder....we don't have much else to trade that teams might want...matthias maybe...a bieksa trade? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Magician Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Good proposal, i’d do that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-Money Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 As much as I want to keep Jensen - I keep feeling like he's a Voracek-type player, a late bloomer - I kind of want to do this deal. We'd actually make something off of Eriksson. ??? Voracek went directly from Junior to the NHL, as an 18-year-old, and scored 38 points in his rookie season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S N Y P E R S 7 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 I'd want to do Markstrom first before we kiss Eriksson goodbye. Markstrom or Lack - one of them has to go. Imagine Lack in an Oilers jersey... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coryberg Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 I'd want to do Markstrom first before we kiss Eriksson Wrong forum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thejazz97 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 I'd want to do Markstrom first before we kiss Eriksson goodbye. Markstrom or Lack - one of them has to go. Imagine Lack in an Oilers jersey... Imagine Markstrom in a Sharks jersey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tragoedia Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 With Baertschi in the system it makes Jensen a little more expendable. It also reduces his chance of panning out. I wouldn't mind getting a decent return for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thejazz97 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 With Baertschi in the system it makes Jensen a little more expendable. It also reduces his chance of panning out. I wouldn't mind getting a decent return for him. We need RWs though... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tragoedia Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 We need RWs though... We are also log jammed at the bottom which will reduce his odds of making it. I'm not writing him off but I would consider the possibility of getting a decent return for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-Money Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 We need RWs though... We may not have a high quantity of RWs in the system, but 4 of our top young players/prospects all play the right side: Virtanen Kassian Baertschi Vey (C/RW, more suited to latter) So there's simply not much room for Jensen, even if he does pan out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pimp C Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 a kassian trade might net us a late 1st or 2nd rounder....lack would maybe get us a 2nd rounder....we don't have much else to trade that teams might want...matthias maybe...a bieksa trade? Why the &^@# would we trade kassian for a late first? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSnipeshow91 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Why the frack would we trade kassian for a late first? Why would we trade Kassian in the first place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pimp C Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Why would we trade Kassian in the first place? I have no idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 We may not have a high quantity of RWs in the system, but 4 of our top young players/prospects all play the right side: Virtanen Kassian Baertschi Vey (C/RW, more suited to latter) So there's simply not much room for Jensen, even if he does pan out. Our future forwards would look beautiful if Jake can play RW. Baertschi - Horvat - Virtanen Shinkaruk - McCann - Kassian Gaunce - Bonino - Jensen That top nine stacked. We'd be golden if we could get a true future top line center though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollumpus Posted April 3, 2015 Share Posted April 3, 2015 We may not have a high quantity of RWs in the system, but 4 of our top young players/prospects all play the right side: Virtanen Kassian Baertschi Vey (C/RW, more suited to latter) So there's simply not much room for Jensen, even if he does pan out. I thought Jensen could play both L and R. regards, G. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BI3KSA- Posted April 3, 2015 Share Posted April 3, 2015 a kassian trade might net us a late 1st or 2nd rounder....lack would maybe get us a 2nd rounder....we don't have much else to trade that teams might want...matthias maybe...a bieksa trade? Lack is easily worth a late 1st now so idk why you think he is maybe worth a 2nd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithers joe Posted April 3, 2015 Share Posted April 3, 2015 Lack is easily worth a late 1st now so idk why you think he is maybe worth a 2ndpersonally, i wouldn't trade lack....i'ld trade miller if there was a taker that he would go to...i'm not sold on kassian...i like what he brings but when he doesn't bring it, i prefer vey's game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.