Scorvat Posted May 22, 2015 Share Posted May 22, 2015 TO LAL 2015 1STTO MIN Randal 2015 1st (27th ovr) 2016 1st Lakers draft Towns and Okafor. I believe this is overpayment value wise in the t-wolves favour. But this will also be a great move for LA. Next years starting lineup. If we get love and rondo as expeted would look like this: Rondo PG Bryant SG Love SF Okafor PF Towns C Not bad for a team that has been so bad since taking in Howard. We could also use clarkson/Lin to make a bigger trade with them. Edit: To lakers: 1st To Wolves: Randal 27th ovr lin clarkson 2017 1st Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jiggs50 Posted May 22, 2015 Share Posted May 22, 2015 That's a terrible offer. Love at sf? What in the f! Rondo has been trash since that acl injury so the Lakers could have him. Would also close any chance on Westbrook next year in free agency. Keep dreaming! Lakers don't have a 1st in 2016 btw. Minny should take Towns. Wolves could easily be a top tier team in a couple of years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Sestito Posted May 22, 2015 Share Posted May 22, 2015 Minny definitely needs to pick one of the bigs. I don't see reason in them trading their pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orka Posted May 22, 2015 Share Posted May 22, 2015 With the youth movement in minny, they are not even gonna consider trading that pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piggy Bank Posted May 22, 2015 Share Posted May 22, 2015 Wigs Lavine Okafor = 2018 Championship. wildcard Bennett Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Sestito Posted May 22, 2015 Share Posted May 22, 2015 Bennett is $&!#. Where are the people who argued he had value?!? I stick with what I said a year ago. Wiggins is the only piece that mattered in that deal. Bennett sucks, that pick is late. Wiggins is ROTY, still doesn't change my mind on the fact that swapping wiggins for love benefited the cavs more than keeping Wiggins did, lol. Can't believe that was ever a debate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil B From The Pack Posted May 22, 2015 Share Posted May 22, 2015 That trade doesn't even make sense, and the Lakers first next season is top 3 protected so they can't trade it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
87Crosby Posted May 22, 2015 Share Posted May 22, 2015 Bennett is crap. Where are the people who argued he had value?!? I stick with what I said a year ago. Wiggins is the only piece that mattered in that deal. Bennett sucks, that pick is late. Wiggins is ROTY, still doesn't change my mind on the fact that swapping wiggins for love benefited the cavs more than keeping Wiggins did, lol. Can't believe that was ever a debate. Honestly I feel Wiggins was in the perfect spot to develop with the T-Wolves. If he was on the Cavs, the media would have a spotlight on him. Their value today is different, in my opinion Wiggins is a better defender now and has potential to be better than Love on the offensive side as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.