DhillonCanuck Posted June 3, 2015 Share Posted June 3, 2015 Trade 1: To Washington: Vrbata To Van: 22nd Overall Trade 2: To Detroit: Edler To Van: 19th Overall Pick 73rd Round Pick Trade 3: To Philadelphia: Bieksa Hansen To Van: 60th Pick 91st Pick Trade 4: To Boston: Hamhuis 60th Pick 73rd Pick 91st Pick To Van: 14th Pick Picks: 14th Pick 19th Pick 22nd Pick 23rd Pick Draft: 14th: Timo Meier 19th: Thomas Chabot 22nd: Jakub Zboril 23rd: Brandon Carlo Prospect Pool: Virtanen Horvat Meier Shinkaruk McCann Baerstchi Kassian Cassels Kenins Gaunce Jensen Zboril Carlo Tanev Chabot Corrado Subban Demko Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithers joe Posted June 3, 2015 Share Posted June 3, 2015 dumb..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaner Posted June 3, 2015 Share Posted June 3, 2015 Where did our team go? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Down by the River Posted June 3, 2015 Share Posted June 3, 2015 Yeah lets dress a team of kids who weren't even born when the Canucks played the Rangers in the SCF. Worked for Edmonton right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DhillonCanuck Posted June 3, 2015 Author Share Posted June 3, 2015 Where did our team go? Poof Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted June 3, 2015 Share Posted June 3, 2015 Philli is not taking Bieksas contract without shedding cap first Seriously I miss capgeek SOOooo much right now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted June 3, 2015 Share Posted June 3, 2015 sorry u dont trade a 50 point dman for a late first and second maybe if u throw in nyquist as well. all these deals are stupid this should be locked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyhee Posted June 3, 2015 Share Posted June 3, 2015 Philli is not taking Bieksas contract without shedding cap first Seriously I miss capgeek SOOooo much right now So do I, but in this case it's so clear that any of nhlnumbers.com, generalfanager.com, hockeys.cap.com or spotract is sufficient to see what would happen. Using generalfanager, it appears so far Philadelphia has committed $69.4 million to 21 NHL players, including 11 forwards, 9 defencemen and 1 goalie. Taking on Bieksa and hansen would add $7.1 million, giving Philadelphia 23 NHL players signed and a total cap hit of about $76.5 million. The 23 players would include 10 d-men and only one goalie. If one takes Pronger off the Philly list it reduces the cap hit to about $71.6 for 22 players, including 9 d-men and only one goalie. Del Zotto is a RFA and not included in the d-men the Flyers are already committed to contractually. Also, one of the Flyers problems this season, it can at least be argued, is that they have some declining veteran defencemen whose cap hits exceed the value of their performance. See http://isportsweb.com/2015/05/30/the-state-of-the-philadelphia-flyers-blue-line-part-three/for a discussion of the state of the Flyers' blue line. Adding another aging, fading d-man with a medium-high cap hit in exchange and giving up draft picks seems not only to put the Flyers in Cap Hades but to be the opposite of the type of move they need to make. As for the effect of the proposals, other than scoring, defending, the power play and the penalty kill, these proposals wouldn't hurt the Canucks too much. The top-2 pick in the 2016 draft would become a possibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyhee Posted June 3, 2015 Share Posted June 3, 2015 Sorry, double post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hd71 Posted June 3, 2015 Share Posted June 3, 2015 To be fair to the OP, he did use heading Prospect Pool and then posted the prospect pool as a lineup, I believe to indicate positions. That was my interpretation.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyhee Posted June 3, 2015 Share Posted June 3, 2015 To be fair to the OP, he did use heading Prospect Pool and then posted the prospect pool as a lineup, I believe to indicate positions. That was my interpretation.. Did anybody misunderstand that and post about the misunderstanding? If you took my comments about the effects on Canucks scoring, defence, pp and pk that way, rest assured I hadn't misunderstood what his list was and I was basing comments on who had been traded away-Canucks' top goal scorer, arguably the top defenceman currently and one of the best defensive forwards on the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brocklovich Posted June 3, 2015 Share Posted June 3, 2015 Doubt these moves happen and you go from playoff team to cellar dweller with a swing of -20 to -30 points not sure the fan base is exactly excited for that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted June 3, 2015 Share Posted June 3, 2015 Sometimes all you can do is laugh.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hd71 Posted June 4, 2015 Share Posted June 4, 2015 Did anybody misunderstand that and post about the misunderstanding? If you took my comments about the effects on Canucks scoring, defence, pp and pk that way, rest assured I hadn't misunderstood what his list was and I was basing comments on who had been traded away-Canucks' top goal scorer, arguably the top defenceman currently and one of the best defensive forwards on the team. I wasn't speaking to your comments, I was speaking to the guys talking about team of kids and where did our team go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChickenDinner Posted June 4, 2015 Share Posted June 4, 2015 Nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.