Boeser23 Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 Ok so these two goalies are young rookies and they are excellent. They both play on the lightning. Since the lightning got 3 world class goalies they might try to sell one. If they do sell 1 of them I beg benning to get us one they will really help our team and we will get rid of miller quicker but the problem is we got markstrom and Demko. maybe we can sell one of them Hamhuis, Weber, Bartkowski, Fox, Saunter, and a first for 1 of there goalies, and 2nd and a 3rd aka Kris is the latvia olympic goalie remember 54 saves on 56 shots against canada Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thejazz97 Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 LOL overpayment much (if you're gunning for Gudlevskis) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monteeun Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 Ouch to our blueline. I mean it was already ouch as it is, but after that... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jägermeister Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 That trade would be freaking terrible for Vasilvskiy, let alone Gudlevskis. Gudlevskis was mediocre in the AHL last year (and the year before). I wouldn't trade anything more than a 3rd rounder for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desiboynux4lifee******* Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 what? We don't need goaltending in our prospect pool, we need defence dude! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piggy Bank Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 Vasil is better right now, but in 6 years it may be a dif story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 U w0t m8? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ossi Vaananen Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 dafuq? Goalies are dirt cheap right now. That's a massive overpayment. We're fine for the next two years with Miller/Markstrom. Demko some time after that. GRanted we might need a filler for a few years before Demko is ready, but 3rd string is hardly worth that kind of payment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Biestra Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 That suggested trade is so ridiculously one sided for the Lightning, I can't possibly believe you're serious. Take out the 1st rounder and it's still way lopsided for Tampa. Add to the fact that the main reason we got rid of Lack was that we lose Markstrom on waivers if we send him down. We can't carry three goalies without losing one, unless you know that whoever we trade for isn't waiver eligible. Would be fun to have Gudlevskis in the minors developing and as a backup backup like Markstrom was last year. But at that price? Just to be a stopgap until Demko arrives? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milk and honey Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 we need defenders. A goalie can do so much with the guys in front me. demko will be a star if our defense play defense properly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpt Posted August 10, 2015 Share Posted August 10, 2015 I'm completely happy at this point moving forward with Markstrom and Demko; one if not both will be good NHL starters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasCanuck Posted August 10, 2015 Share Posted August 10, 2015 Ok so these two goalies are young rookies and they are excellent. They both play on the lightning. Since the lightning got 3 world class goalies they might try to sell one. If they do sell 1 of them I beg benning to get us one they will really help our team and we will get rid of miller quicker but the problem is we got markstrom and Demko. maybe we can sell one of them Hamhuis, Weber, Bartkowski, Fox, Saunter, and a first for 1 of there goalies, and 2nd and a 3rd aka Kris is the latvia olympic goalie remember 54 saves on 56 shots against canada Why would the Canucks do this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vancouvercanucks#1 Posted August 10, 2015 Share Posted August 10, 2015 Yeah then let's trade Demko for a 7th Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
on the cycle Posted August 10, 2015 Share Posted August 10, 2015 Gudlevskis. His performance against Canada in the Olympics was nothing short of incredible. He stood on his head soo much he need a breathing break; that was the first time I have ever seen that. I don't think it would cost more than a 3rd round pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
on the cycle Posted August 10, 2015 Share Posted August 10, 2015 what? We don't need goaltending in our prospect pool, we need defence dude! So one goalie in the NCAA, Bachman is not young anymore, and Cannata doesn't look like he'll make it past a 3rd string goalie. We could definitely use some prospect goalie depth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManUtd Posted August 10, 2015 Share Posted August 10, 2015 Weird trade so Benning probably likes it especially if it's for Gudlevskis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-SN- Posted August 10, 2015 Share Posted August 10, 2015 Threads like this belong in the proposals forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.