Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

NASA to Make ‘Amazing’ Announcement About Pluto Oct.8


nucklehead

Recommended Posts

ONE of NASA’s principal investigators has let slip the space agency will be making another huge announcement this week regarding Pluto.

And if Dr Alan Stern’s comments to a packed hall at the University of Alberta in Canada are anything to go by, we might very well be talking about alien life forms.

According to The Guardian, Mr Stern was showcasing the highest resolution photos of Pluto and its largest moon, Charon, when he made some huge announcements.

“This world is alive,” he said.

“It has weather, it has hazes in the atmosphere, active geology.”

Mr Stern said NASA would be releasing new data and images this Friday (Australian time) that will change everything we know about the solar system.

“NASA won’t let me tell you what we’re going to tell you on Thursday. It’s amazing,” he said.

While not giving anything away, space enthusiasts are expecting huge news because of the approach NASA is taking for the announcement.

The space agency has used a similar method when it detailed the discovery of the Earth-like Kepler 452b and the recent discovery of flowing water on Mars.

The most recent pictures from the New Horizons spacecraft showcased a wide variety of terrains on both Pluto and Charon.

It was discovered Charon has a huge canyon running 2500km across its surface, while Pluto is home to an odd landscape of rolling and grooved mountains spanning 500km.

Mr Stern said as only 10 per cent of the data from the New Horizons spacecraft has been downloaded, we can only expect to learn more about the dwarf planet and its moon.

http://www.news.com.au/technology/science/senior-planetary-scientist-dr-alan-stern-said-nasa-to-make-amazing-announcement-about-pluto/story-fnjwlcze-1227561833273

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, the rumour is "false"

Life on Pluto? Rumours rage of upcoming announcement branded 'false' by NASA scientist THERE was huge disappointment within the scientific community today after rumours that NASA was set to make a huge announcement about life on Pluto were quashed by its top scientist.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/610748/NASA-announcement-Pluto-Horizons-probe-life

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blue haze surrounds Pluto and it has patches of water ice colored red.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/nasa-announcement-pluto-has-blue-skies-and-water-ice-agency-says-as-it-reveals-stunning-pictures-of-a6686646.html

Maybe it's interesting enough to be reclassified as a planet again.

Nope. People don't seem to understand why it was classified as a dwarf planet in the first place.

The main reason being, for the longest time, Pluto was the only thing that we had observed in the Kuiper belt. Once they realized there was lots of large, rocky objects in that area, they said "as long as we don't find anything bigger than Pluto, we're all good".

But then they found Ceres. They had to choose between adding dozens of new planets to the solar system, or simply reclassifying Pluto as a dwarf planet, as to fit in with the more similar objects around it. There's other reasons too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. People don't seem to understand why it was classified as a dwarf planet in the first place.

The main reason being, for the longest time, Pluto was the only thing that we had observed in the Kuiper belt. Once they realized there was lots of large, rocky objects in that area, they said "as long as we don't find anything bigger than Pluto, we're all good".

But then they found Ceres. They had to choose between adding dozens of new planets to the solar system, or simply reclassifying Pluto as a dwarf planet, as to fit in with the more similar objects around it. There's other reasons too.

Ceres has a radius of 473km. Pluto has a radius of 1186 km. Pluto also has an atmosphere and several moons.

What makes Pluto not a planet is that it has not cleared its orbit of other major objects. In order to be considered a planet, an object must have sufficient gravity to clear all other major objects from its orbit. It's a bit unfair as Pluto's orbit is just way bigger than the planets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. People don't seem to understand why it was classified as a dwarf planet in the first place.

The main reason being, for the longest time, Pluto was the only thing that we had observed in the Kuiper belt. Once they realized there was lots of large, rocky objects in that area, they said "as long as we don't find anything bigger than Pluto, we're all good".

But then they found Ceres. They had to choose between adding dozens of new planets to the solar system, or simply reclassifying Pluto as a dwarf planet, as to fit in with the more similar objects around it. There's other reasons too.

Ceres, Pluto's moon?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ceres, Pluto's moon?

Ceres is in the asteroid belt. It was the discovery of Eris that got the ball rolling on the reclassification of Pluto. They have since discovered many other objects in the same general vicinity of orbit and they figure there is likely many more out there. Pluto as a planet only really makes sense in sentimental terms, even if it ends up being the biggest KBO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blue haze surrounds Pluto and it has patches of water ice colored red.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/nasa-announcement-pluto-has-blue-skies-and-water-ice-agency-says-as-it-reveals-stunning-pictures-of-a6686646.html

Maybe it's interesting enough to be reclassified as a planet again.

They didn't expect to find a blue sky way out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ceres has a radius of 473km. Pluto has a radius of 1186 km. Pluto also has an atmosphere and several moons.

What makes Pluto not a planet is that it has not cleared its orbit of other major objects. In order to be considered a planet, an object must have sufficient gravity to clear all other major objects from its orbit. It's a bit unfair as Pluto's orbit is just way bigger than the planets.

But then Eris has only a slightly smaller diameter than Pluto but has greater mass, so it would then also have to become a planet, perhaps a better comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ceres has a radius of 473km. Pluto has a radius of 1186 km. Pluto also has an atmosphere and several moons.

What makes Pluto not a planet is that it has not cleared its orbit of other major objects. In order to be considered a planet, an object must have sufficient gravity to clear all other major objects from its orbit. It's a bit unfair as Pluto's orbit is just way bigger than the planets.

My mistake you are correct. I was thinking about Eris, not Ceres.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ceres is in the asteroid belt. It was the discovery of Eris that got the ball rolling on the reclassification of Pluto. They have since discovered many other objects in the same general vicinity of orbit and they figure there is likely many more out there. Pluto as a planet only really makes sense in sentimental terms, even if it ends up being the biggest KBO.

Oh Charon was Pluto's moon. Right.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...