Mike Vanderhoek Posted November 2, 2015 Share Posted November 2, 2015 How is Vancouver tied to this rumour?Fowler to Boston for who? Chara?This is CDC lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Vanderhoek Posted November 2, 2015 Share Posted November 2, 2015 I'd be exstatic if we aquired Fowler, however I can't see a trade for him not involving one of our top prospects. Would you do it? I don't think Anaheim would want Hamhuis...as would I however I think the Ducks may be finding out taking the Canucks pieces isn't exactly a recipe for success lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHL rocks Posted November 2, 2015 Share Posted November 2, 2015 Why would ANA trade Fowler? Nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstank29 Posted November 2, 2015 Share Posted November 2, 2015 Why would ANA trade Fowler? Nonsense.I would be interested in Theodore if they were willing to move him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanucklehead10 Posted November 2, 2015 Share Posted November 2, 2015 So.. Boston trades away a young, promising right handed defenseman in Hamilton (who is better/younger than Fowler) because he's expendable? and after only 3 months, suddenly feel that they want a young, promising defenseman?Love how Bruins management is being run by a bunch of idiots.They shouldn't have let Chiarelli go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted November 2, 2015 Share Posted November 2, 2015 Often wrong Eklund strikes again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted November 2, 2015 Author Share Posted November 2, 2015 they should trade shyneshyn and the whl kid forward from swift current to anaheim along with a 2nd for Fowler lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted November 2, 2015 Share Posted November 2, 2015 Often wrong Eklund strikes again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chalky Posted November 2, 2015 Share Posted November 2, 2015 The Anaheim rumours are going to come in droves if they don't turn it around soon. I could see Boston trying to grab a young Dman after losing Hamilton, but who would Anaheim want in return? No way they want Chara. Perhaps Ericksson or Hayes. Marchand? I don't see this happening unless Boston is willing to give up goals, cuz that's what Anaheim needs. This could easily be another Eklund turd on a wall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jam126 Posted November 2, 2015 Share Posted November 2, 2015 Watch the Canucks get Fowler for Vey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted November 2, 2015 Share Posted November 2, 2015 I'd rather take a stab at Shea Theodore than Fowler who's getting a bit washed up now. Wouldn't mind Lindholm or Vatanen though if the Ducks are really looking to mix things up.Shinkaruk and/or Gaunce are our best trading chips at the moment. Anaheim like their forwards big and skilled, so throw Jensen in there as a possible chip too.I'd do Shinkaruk for Theodore straight up in a heart-beat. Or even better, Jensen + 2nd rounder for Theodore. That's a future top-6 forward for a future top-4 defenceman, or a middle-6 forward + early 2nd (Columbus') for a top-4 defenceman.Horvat, McCann, Cassels down the middle. Virtanen, Boeser, Baertschi, Gaunce, Shinkaruk on the wing. That's a pretty decent forward group. Now add Hutton, Subban and Theodore. All that defence needs is another shutdown right handed, physical defenceman and they're set. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted November 2, 2015 Share Posted November 2, 2015 as would I however I think the Ducks may be finding out taking the Canucks pieces isn't exactly a recipe for success lolLast I checked our team is actually scoring and winning some games. I'd hate to have these pieces as well if I was Anaheim... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted November 2, 2015 Share Posted November 2, 2015 I know it's Eklund, but can you not even post the link (ideally plus the quote) in the OP? Why not just make crap up and say 'Eklund' otherwise? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted November 2, 2015 Share Posted November 2, 2015 I'd rather take a stab at Shea Theodore than Fowler who's getting a bit washed up now. Wouldn't mind Lindholm or Vatanen though if the Ducks are really looking to mix things up.Shinkaruk and/or Gaunce are our best trading chips at the moment. Anaheim like their forwards big and skilled, so throw Jensen in there as a possible chip too.I'd do Shinkaruk for Theodore straight up in a heart-beat. Or even better, Jensen + 2nd rounder for Theodore. That's a future top-6 forward for a future top-4 defenceman, or a middle-6 forward + early 2nd (Columbus') for a top-4 defenceman.Horvat, McCann, Cassels down the middle. Virtanen, Boeser, Baertschi, Gaunce, Shinkaruk on the wing. That's a pretty decent forward group. Now add Hutton, Subban and Theodore. All that defence needs is another shutdown right handed, physical defenceman and they're set.You do realize he's 23, right? 34 and 36 points the last two seasons... and he's washed up... wow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted November 2, 2015 Share Posted November 2, 2015 I'd rather take a stab at Shea Theodore than Fowler who's getting a bit washed up now. Wouldn't mind Lindholm or Vatanen though if the Ducks are really looking to mix things up.Shinkaruk and/or Gaunce are our best trading chips at the moment. Anaheim like their forwards big and skilled, so throw Jensen in there as a possible chip too.I'd do Shinkaruk for Theodore straight up in a heart-beat. Or even better, Jensen + 2nd rounder for Theodore. That's a future top-6 forward for a future top-4 defenceman, or a middle-6 forward + early 2nd (Columbus') for a top-4 defenceman.Um, what? Player? Are? You? Talking? About?Not sure if you're serious, but Cam Fowler - scored 10 points in 16 playoff games just months ago.He has outstanding underlying numbershttp://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_statistics.php?ds=30&s=29&f1=2015_s&f2=5v5&f5=ANA&c=0+1+3+5+4+6+7+8+13+14+29+30+32+33+34+45+46+63+67#- some of the best on the Ducks, with only 39% offensive zone starts...And he hasn't turned 24 yet and already has over 150 NHL points. "Wouldn't mind Lindholm or Vatanen".... yeah - wouldn't mind either of them lol - or Fowler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fateless Posted November 2, 2015 Share Posted November 2, 2015 CDC is excellent is only good at extremes. People on these boards either completely undervalue or overvalue players on our team and other teams.Some of you saying Fowler is "washed up" are hilarious. I'd take Fowler over every D on our current roster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THERETOOL Posted November 3, 2015 Share Posted November 3, 2015 can we trade eklund for some white spot gift cards ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Monahan Posted November 3, 2015 Share Posted November 3, 2015 I'd rather take a stab at Shea Theodore than Fowler who's getting a bit washed up now.lmao Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted November 3, 2015 Share Posted November 3, 2015 Sorry buddy! But Eklund rumours, especially when the rumour mill is quiet, dont add up much merit.I mean, even if it wasm't Eklund, I'd still be skeptical because the Bruins dont have logic. Honestly I wouldnt be surprised if I woke up tomorrow to see Rask was traded for peanuts.That's why he prefaced the topic with a Warning. He knew it was Eklund and due to that fact, the rumour was probably full of fecal matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted November 3, 2015 Share Posted November 3, 2015 Um, what? Player? Are? You? Talking? About?Not sure if you're serious, but Cam Fowler - scored 10 points in 16 playoff games just months ago.He has outstanding underlying numbershttp://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_statistics.php?ds=30&s=29&f1=2015_s&f2=5v5&f5=ANA&c=0+1+3+5+4+6+7+8+13+14+29+30+32+33+34+45+46+63+67#- some of the best on the Ducks, with only 39% offensive zone starts...And he hasn't turned 24 yet and already has over 150 NHL points. "Wouldn't mind Lindholm or Vatanen".... yeah - wouldn't mind either of them lol - or Fowler.DownUnda often doesn't know what he's talking about. Fowler's an excellent young defenceman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.