Mr.DirtyDangles Posted November 23, 2015 Share Posted November 23, 2015 1 minute ago, Twilight Sparkle said: it's craig button Exactly ; D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeslerBEAST Posted November 23, 2015 Share Posted November 23, 2015 lol this is like purely based on points what a useless list, no way should Edler be higher than Tanev and Vrbata being ahead of horvat is a joke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
falcon45ca Posted November 23, 2015 Share Posted November 23, 2015 C's & B's get degrees... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted November 23, 2015 Share Posted November 23, 2015 Miller at a C- is too harsh. He was stellar to start and is just now beginning to falter. Burrows at a C is too low; he's not shocking anyone, but he's doing better than last year. Horvat's C- is also too low, though you wouldn't think so by looking at the stats. He's been playing well, but just not producing well. My guess is that the C- is based off his lacklustre statistics and not on his actual performance in-game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tre Mac Posted November 23, 2015 Share Posted November 23, 2015 Now I grade TSN Hotness of Female Hosts : A 100% Un-bias Coast to Coast Coverage : F No Damien Cox : A- Overall Grade: B+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honky Cat Posted November 23, 2015 Share Posted November 23, 2015 They look fairly accurate to me....only Burrows' grade is unfair ...Millers low grade is obviously ascertained by his big salary.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poetica Posted November 23, 2015 Share Posted November 23, 2015 Unfortunately, I don't disagree with their rating of Miller. He's been pretty average after the first few games. Of course, his stats also partially the reflect the team in front of him too, not just his own performance. And he is still playing well enough for us to win if the team plays well for the entire game. I'd love to say it's growth that has resulted in how fans and the media here are viewing Miller's stats as being acceptable but thought Luongo's even better stats were completely unacceptable. I'd love to, but I'm not an idiot... Now, rating Burr a C is BS. He's 5th on the team for points and first on the team for takeaways (good for 55th in the league). His -2 rating is mostly the result of the fact that 5 of his 11 points came on the PP and he's been shuttled around and asked to play different roles on different lines repeatedly throughout the season. And how does Horvat get rated lower than Vrbata? Vrbata makes more money, people also had high expectations for him, and he's been given better chances, like first line time. I don't understand why people are hating on Horvat all ready. It's his sophomore year on a slumping team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honky Cat Posted November 23, 2015 Share Posted November 23, 2015 3 minutes ago, poetica said: Unfortunately, I don't disagree with their rating of Miller. He's been pretty average after the first few games. Of course, his stats also partially the reflect the team in front of him too, not just his own performance. And he is still playing well enough for us to win if the team plays well for the entire game. I'd love to say it's growth that has resulted in how fans and the media here are viewing Miller's stats as being acceptable but thought Luongo's even better stats were completely unacceptable. I'd love to, but I'm not an idiot... Now, rating Burr a C is BS. He's 5th on the team for points and first on the team for takeaways (good for 55th in the league). His -2 rating is mostly the result of the fact that 5 of his 11 points came on the PP and he's been shuttled around and asked to play different roles on different lines repeatedly throughout the season. And how does Horvat get rated lower than Vrbata? Vrbata makes more money, people also had high expectations for him, and he's been given better chances, like first line time. I don't understand why people are hating on Horvat all ready. It's his sophomore year on a slumping team. Bo's stats took a beating on this last road trip....(he's had to shoulder more responsibility)...He's coming around now,and was probably the best player for the Canucks last night..I expect his rating to improve for the second quarter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chalky Posted November 23, 2015 Share Posted November 23, 2015 Hansen deserves an A. Hansen may also deserve an "A". Dude is killing it this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattrek Posted November 23, 2015 Share Posted November 23, 2015 These 4 rankings show all we need to determine how fair these grades are: Hutton: B- Tanev: B- Sutter: B- Hansen: B Each player should all be in the A range, let alone barely in the B grade. Toronto Sports Network strikes again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted November 23, 2015 Share Posted November 23, 2015 1 hour ago, 5Fivehole0 said: Aside from Baertschi and Burrows ratings I actually agree with them. Team has been under performing in a big way. Really? They're perfectly mediocre. Under performing based on....? Because this is where a lot of people expected them to be. Not good enough for the playoffs to good for a decent pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haikara Posted November 23, 2015 Share Posted November 23, 2015 1 hour ago, John Tortorella said: Very poorly done. Perhaps next time they will send someone to grade the canucks who watches the canucks. Miller c-? vrbata higher then horvat? Vrbata has been largest disappointment this year. Hutton is low, your telling me you had expected more from hutton? cracknell that low? Your telling me hes not our most consistent player based on position and expectations. Toronto Sports Media I don't understand why they bother to put in salary because Cracknell has been playing pretty well for his salary, ice time, and initial expectations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shift-4 Posted November 23, 2015 Share Posted November 23, 2015 I guess TSN doesn't watch hockey any more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fateless Posted November 23, 2015 Share Posted November 23, 2015 Lost me pretty quickly with the list, but Hutton as a B- really blew my mind. Considering the grades are based on expectations coming into the season, they're telling us that they expected Hutton to be performing BETTER than he has so far? What kind of crystal ball were they looking into? Hutton wasn't even expected to challenge for a spot on this team and they're saying the guy playing top-4 minutes and who is second among Canuck defencemen in scoring is playing below expectation level? Wow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonMexico Posted November 23, 2015 Share Posted November 23, 2015 Same old song and dance. Sedins carry this team....and people want to ditch them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homersexual Posted November 23, 2015 Share Posted November 23, 2015 I do find it funny they had to include the salary. That shouldn't matter when grading the player. Either they are playing well or they aren't. Would Miller get a B if his salary was 3 million? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaBamba Posted November 23, 2015 Share Posted November 23, 2015 Miller has been great although, because we lose by 1 goal all the time, those missed saves become glaringly obvious. For his age, the minutes he has played and the quality of our d-corpse he needs at least a B. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hatedkid666 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 I give TSN an F Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plaguez Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 Not sure how anyone can disagree with Miller's grade. He's been terrible since the first 4 games. That many games with a save percentage below .900 is brutal. Only grade I didn't agree with was Hanks. He's been A+ this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odd. Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 Don't know about you guys but I really don't give 2 squats about these 'Grades'. Miller C-? Vrbata higher than Horvat? Ugh. TSN pisses me off sometimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.