Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Troy Stecher | #51 | D


Gstank29

Recommended Posts

Just now, Boudrias said:

Stecher played well against the Jets. Very quick with the 1st pass and a real nice skater. Suggesting he has eclipsed Subban is premature. He likely makes the main camp and how he plays with NHL vets will be interesting. He won't make the opening roster so Utica and Travis Green are in his future which is great IMHO.

Why is it it premature? Stetcher has impressed me way more than Subban. I've been rooting for the kid to make it. No one questions he's got skill. He just has yet to put his game all together. If Subban was on wing I'd think he'd have a greater chance of success. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said:

Why is it it premature? Stetcher has impressed me way more than Subban. I've been rooting for the kid to make it. No one questions he's got skill. He just has yet to put his game all together. If Subban was on wing I'd think he'd have a greater chance of success. 

Agreed.  Subban is a really likeable player but i don't think he has enough to make it to the next level as a d-man.  Stecher may not either but I believe he is farther along than Subban.

 

The idea of Subban on the wing is a really interesting one...

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Dynamic Innovator said:

Agreed.  Subban is a really likeable player but i don't think he has enough to make it to the next level as a d-man.  Stecher may not either but I believe he is farther along than Subban.

 

The idea of Subban on the wing is a really interesting one...

Subban will make it as a dman. He's not the conventional Dman, but he has the talent and ability to be an undersized dman. I want him to have one more season in the AHL, then step in as a 3rd pairing, PP specialist. (Larsens likely spot now) Stecher I see with more two way ability who can play top 4. A pairing with Hutton and Stecher could be an effective 2 way pairing. It will be interesting to see if Stecher can make it to the NHL first. I can see him joining the main group mid season after a couple of months

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mr.53 said:

Subban will make it as a dman. He's not the conventional Dman, but he has the talent and ability to be an undersized dman. I want him to have one more season in the AHL, then step in as a 3rd pairing, PP specialist. (Larsens likely spot now) Stecher I see with more two way ability who can play top 4. A pairing with Hutton and Stecher could be an effective 2 way pairing. It will be interesting to see if Stecher can make it to the NHL first. I can see him joining the main group mid season after a couple of months

Do you think Subban has enough potential?  I'd love to see it happen - his style of play is super entertaining.  IMO his best D pairing would be a guy like Gudbranson who would hang back and let him take risks. 

 

Stecher does have a more rounded game and would work well with Hutton.  Only concern is physical play.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stecher appears very smart, and his timing in making passes seems excellent.  No, he might not be a physical presence but the same could be said of a player like Tanev.  Yet, Tanev plays his role so well that most of us forgive him for not being particularly physical. 

 

Now that we have guys on our blueline like Guds and Tryamkin, it allows other players to play to their strengths rather than having to do it all.  Guys like Hutton and Stecher should be able to play the way they are most effective.  I would argue that Stecher's best position is on a DIFFERENT line than Hutton, save for the power play, where wall-stopping size and strength isn't nearly as important as it is on 5vs5 play.

 

And Subban - I'm rooting for this guy to make the NHL.  Even for the minor leagues (which can make some players look better than they really are) his offensive prowess is impressive.  He needs to put on enough size and find his defensive game as to not be a liability.  If he can do that, I see him as having real dark horse potential.  (No racial pun intended there).

Edited by kloubek
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, elvis15 said:

Considering Hutton was in the running for the Hobey Baker at one point, I'll say no. That doesn't mean he's bad but it does mean we shouldn't go comparing the two and expecting the same trajectory.

The only reason i compared was because Hutton was a surprise LOL!!

 

I didnt know he was in the running for Hobey Baker 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if anyone can do what Ben Hutton did last year, it's Stetcher. I didn't get to watch the YST this year, but his highlights were impressive. Juolevi looked out of place on many occasions, while Stetcher seemed comfortable and capable of making NHL plays.

 

I'm no expert, but I'm going to predict he makes the team easily like Hutton did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎9‎/‎19‎/‎2016 at 7:41 AM, Ghostsof1915 said:

Why is it it premature? Stetcher has impressed me way more than Subban. I've been rooting for the kid to make it. No one questions he's got skill. He just has yet to put his game all together. If Subban was on wing I'd think he'd have a greater chance of success. 

Unfortunately I was not able to see Subban play in Penticton. No doubt that things can change in the pro camp. Stecher is 22 and has played against men during his college career so from a physicality perspective is likely not that far behind Subban. I do not expect either one to make the Canuck roster and that is fine by me. Both are smaller players who have to learn a style of defense that allows them to stick in the NHL. Best teacher is TOI in the AHL. Would love to see both get some NHL games this year.

 

My take on Stecher's game is that he plays a more physical game than Subban. Subban seems to walk the blue line more. Both are great passers and skaters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as I'd like to see him on the Canucks, I would prefer he plays in Utica and we give guys like Pedan a chance to get some minutes. They've put time in the AHL to get a shot with our organization. No one from Utica has really graduated after 2 years to the NHL. Only Marky and Sven who played 1 season and half a season in the AHL. Need to start seeing what the 2 and 3 year projects are before it's too late. Grenier, Gaunce, Pedan, and so fourth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stecher was one of the best looking Canucks in Penticton. I thought he might try to do too much, being back "home" but he did what he had to and played a strong game.

 

I look forward to seeing what he can do in the coming seasons. I would not be surprised if he forces his way onto the roster. And if not then he can get lots of ice time playing for the Comets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DJSkingz said:

Stecher was one of the best looking Canucks in Penticton. I thought he might try to do too much, being back "home" but he did what he had to and played a strong game.

 

I look forward to seeing what he can do in the coming seasons. I would not be surprised if he forces his way onto the roster. And if not then he can get lots of ice time playing for the Comets.

I agree Stecher played well. He handled the puck a lot. Quick nice passes. Skates well. I thought Stecher, Cassels and Joulevi were thinking position first.

 

I don't expect Stecher to make the Canucks simply because Benning has to make choices between Sbisa, Tryamkin. Larsson, Pedan and even the forgotten man Biega. Most fans are dropping Biega down and that likely happens because of numbers and age. I think Biega is a really decent d-man but the TOI has to go to younger players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Boudrias said:

I agree Stecher played well. He handled the puck a lot. Quick nice passes. Skates well. I thought Stecher, Cassels and Joulevi were thinking position first.

 

I don't expect Stecher to make the Canucks simply because Benning has to make choices between Sbisa, Tryamkin. Larsson, Pedan and even the forgotten man Biega. Most fans are dropping Biega down and that likely happens because of numbers and age. I think Biega is a really decent d-man but the TOI has to go to younger players.

I can't see him beating Tryamkin out for a spot and without seeing Larsen play it's hard to tell but I have a feeling Stetcher will outplay Larsen and be the first guy called if they feel they want a more offensive presence. If a guy like Sbisa or Gudbranson go down then Biega or Pedan would be called on I would guess. Will be great for Stetcher to get some tims in ths AHL with Green anyhow. With a lot of luck he could be our Vatanen. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...