StealthNuck

Alexander Edler | #23 | D

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Hutton Wink said:

For those who believe our players have little or no perceived trade value, here's what a Florida writer proposed for Edler today:

 

To Florida Panthers
Alexander Edler (D)

To Vancouver Canucks
First Round Pick 2019
Third Round Pick 2020
MacKenzie Weegar (D)
Jonathan Ang (C)

 

 

To Florida Panthers
Alexander Edler (D)

To Vancouver Canucks
First Round Pick 2019
Aleksi Heponiemi (C)

Good ole HockeyBuzz.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, PhillipBlunt said:

Good ole HockeyBuzz.

That Heponiemi kid looks legit.  Him and a first isn't half bad.  Florida isn't exactly in a position to get far in the post season. Barring any big trades that might come this summer. Edler moves the needle some sure.  Likely first/second round exit tho.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Edler for a first round pick?  Am I dreaming?  If that deal is on the table at the draft then you pull the trigger...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Rush17 said:

That Heponiemi kid looks legit.

Except that he makes Gaudreau look like a behemoth.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Frankie Sinatra said:

Edler for a first round pick?  Am I dreaming?  

He's a top pair D...

 

Seriously people's valuations....:picard:

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, aGENT said:

He's a top pair D...

 

Seriously people's valuations....:picard:

He's a borderline top pair D on the CANUCKS.  That doesn't say much.  He's also only got one year left on his contract.  I'd drive him to the airport myself if we could get a first round pick for him really...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, aGENT said:

He's a top pair D...

 

Seriously people's valuations....:picard:

Edler will get an extension.  He and Gudbranson will be our top pair for a couple years for sure.  They play well together.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Frankie Sinatra said:

He's a borderline top pair D on the CANUCKS.  That doesn't say much.  He's also only got one year left on his contract.  I'd drive him to the airport myself if we could get a first round pick for him really...

There's nothing borderline about him. The guy plays 23+ minutes a night in ALL situations. He's by far our best D and it's not particularly close.

 

He'd be a top pair D on any team that doesn't already have a better legit #1 or comparable #2 left D.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, aGENT said:

There's nothing borderline about him. The guy plays 23+ minutes a night in ALL situations. He's by far our best D and it's not particularly close.

 

He'd be a top pair D on any team that doesn't already have a better legit #1 or comparable #2 left D.

I've watched Edler play his whole career.  You are talking about an Edler from 5-7 years ago.  The Edler of today is a liability on the PP, he wouldn't be my first choice to be on the ice with 2 minutes left in a 2-2 deadlock, and he certainly wouldn't be a #1 pairing defenceman on a playoff team with Stanley Cup aspirations...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Frankie Sinatra said:

I've watched Edler play his whole career.  You are talking about an Edler from 5-7 years ago.  The Edler of today is a liability on the PP, he wouldn't be my first choice to be on the ice with 2 minutes left in a 2-2 deadlock, and he certainly wouldn't be a #1 pairing defenceman on a playoff team with Stanley Cup aspirations...

Nope. Edler circa 2018. And he could easily be on a 1st pair on a contender.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, aGENT said:

Nope. Edler circa 2018. And he could easily be on a 1st pair on a contender.

We can agree to disagree my friend.  Edler is a hot button topic in Vancouver.  I'm sure we can both agree that the Canucks really need an injection of talented youth on the blue line.  With Juolevi on his way and Tryamkin and Brisebois a possibility in a year or two, I see positive signs for our back end.  Love Troy Stecher.  My favourite future pairing would be Juolevi and Tryamkin.  I hope the big Russian decides to come back home soon where he belongs...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Frankie Sinatra said:

We can agree to disagree my friend.  Edler is a hot button topic in Vancouver.  I'm sure we can both agree that the Canucks really need an injection of talented youth on the blue line.  With Juolevi on his way and Tryamkin and Brisebois a possibility in a year or two, I see positive signs for our back end.  Love Troy Stecher.  My favourite future pairing would be Juolevi and Tryamkin.  I hope the big Russian decides to come back home soon where he belongs...

And likely a top D this draft as well ;) Any of whom would fit nicely with OJ IMO.

 

Edler, Letang would be a killer 1st pair in PIT FYI  :P 

 

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

As valuable as the pair (Krug and Grzelcyk) is to the Bruins, the team realizes that finding a big body to play behind Chara is a must. The Bruins saw first-hand in their series with the Lightning how valuable having size on a blue line is. The Lightning slowed down the Bruins with a healthy dose of Victor Hedman, followed by Ryan McDonagh. Two left shot defensemen who both hover above six feet.

 

“As far as size goes, would it be nice to have a little bigger [defenseman] on the left side other than Z? Yes. So that’s something I think Don [Sweeney] is going to work on in the offseason,” Neely added. “But that’s not to take away from what the guys did on the left side for us. I thought they played very well for us.”

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Edler will be 33 at the end of his current contract. I think he will be able to play a couple more years and would be okay with a 2 year contract or even 3 year contract at same cap hit.

We may have more left D than right D but I don't see Hutton and DJ Del Zotto being here beyond next year leaving room open for Juolevi. Having a work horse like Edler around will be good for this team. 

  • Hydration 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, zombieksa said:

Edler will be 33 at the end of his current contract. I think he will be able to play a couple more years and would be okay with a 2 year contract or even 3 year contract at same cap hit.

We may have more left D than right D but I don't see Hutton and DJ Del Zotto being here beyond next year leaving room open for Juolevi. Having a work horse like Edler around will be good for this team. 

Yup, and he can wind down to 2nd or 3rd pair as he ages, Juolevi ascends etc. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd do either of those trades, especially the second trade. Edler is a decent #2, great #3 miscast in a #1 role in Vancouver. He lead our players in icetime per game by a whopping 3:29 and really does it all. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 18/05/2018 at 3:34 PM, Alflives said:

Edler will get an extension.  He and Gudbranson will be our top pair for a couple years for sure.  They play well together.  

The more I think about it, the more I feel Edler is important to transition to the new team.  He can put up at least some points, play an ok defensive game and isnt soft.  He can be the teacher for our young guys and we can probably re-sign him at a more reasonable number soon.

 

If we COULD get a 1st rounder, sure.  Not convinced we could, and if not, id rather he stick around.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, kloubek said:

The more I think about it, the more I feel Edler is important to transition to the new team.  He can put up at least some points, play an ok defensive game and isnt soft.  He can be the teacher for our young guys and we can probably re-sign him at a more reasonable number soon.

 

If we COULD get a 1st rounder, sure.  Not convinced we could, and if not, id rather he stick around.

 

There's also the question on whether he'd even waive. If he won't, we might be best off re-signing him and continuing to get value out of him as a solid, veteran, 2 way D who can shelter our youth and slowly transition to 2nd and 3rd pairs as kids improve. 

 

 

  • Hydration 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.