Ihatetomatoes Posted December 30, 2019 Share Posted December 30, 2019 30 minutes ago, Elias Pettersson said: Juolevi would be in the NHL today if not for the injuries. C'mon you can't really believe otherwise can you? Yes you can. Its entirely possible he'd be in the NHL or its possible he'd still be developing in the AHL. Maybe have some call ups but I'm just not sold on Juolevi's foot speed being NHL caliber and I'm not sold that that's because of the injuries Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elias Pettersson Posted December 30, 2019 Share Posted December 30, 2019 3 minutes ago, Ihatetomatoes said: Yes you can. Its entirely possible he'd be in the NHL or its possible he'd still be developing in the AHL. Maybe have some call ups but I'm just not sold on Juolevi's foot speed being NHL caliber and I'm not sold that that's because of the injuries Well for sure he would have had some call ups at a minimum. His foot speed was never an issue in Junior. He's having issues now because of his knee and hip. I'm sure if he can finish out the year strong and a good summer workout with a skating coach he could have a shot next year at the big club. We will see. His vision and hockey IQ are already at an NHL level. Let's see if he can get that body to perform like his mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dpn1 Posted December 30, 2019 Share Posted December 30, 2019 5 hours ago, Ihatetomatoes said: Quinn Hughes is the only defenseman on the roster that Benning has drafted. And please don't just list a bunch of prospects like that's proof that he's doing a good job of it. None of them are stud blue chip prospects. They are good but none are guaranteed NHL players. I don't really have a beef. I was just pointing out that I think it's not an accurate statement to say that since Benning was a defender he knows a lot about what it takes to be a defender in the NHL and therefore he's good at finding NHL level defensive talent. Ironically he's been much better at finding talent for the forward lineup. I didn't think it would be that controversial of an opinion since it seems pretty obvious looking at the defenders that have come and gone. Considering it takes longer to develop Dmen, I would say Jim is doing something right in drafting Dmen. I won't go on about examples, as you wanted, but even those in the know like Button on TSN, agree that our dman prospects are quite good. Again, dmen take a longer time to develop so I think Jim is pretty on schedule. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herberts Vasiljevs Posted December 30, 2019 Share Posted December 30, 2019 6 hours ago, dpn1 said: Considering it takes longer to develop Dmen, I would say Jim is doing something right in drafting Dmen. I won't go on about examples, as you wanted, but even those in the know like Button on TSN, agree that our dman prospects are quite good. Again, dmen take a longer time to develop so I think Jim is pretty on schedule. Not saying I don't believe you but do you have a source for this? I'm just interested. Button is a bit of a dweeb but I tend to agree with him on a lot of things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Phat Fingers Posted December 30, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted December 30, 2019 (edited) 17 hours ago, Ihatetomatoes said: Sure. If you think one NHL player and bunch of guys that are hopeful to maybe have an NHL career in 5 years of drafting proves that Benning is good at finding defensive talent then fine. Agree to disagree. But really I was more alluding to his overall ability than his drafting. We've seen him target some fairly garbage defenders over the years. Anyway. Juolevi talk With draft picks are you referring too. As for FA's, once with Clendenning, even Luke schenn was okay here. Guddy didn't do well, but Pearson has been a tonic for the second line. Trymakin, Forsling, Breazer, OJ, Hughes, Woo, Rathbone, Utunen are all either NHLers or expected to have a good shot at becoming NHL regulars. As for free agents, Stecher looks like a good pickup, Fattenburg, Benn and Myers are all NHL caliber. Caulflied, Saunter and Rafferty are pretty interesting. Not sure if you have looked into JB's defenceman or not. Now for reference Corrado was our best d prospect and Hutton was our only homegrown talent to make our horrible roster in 6 years when JB took over. Seems light years better and I am not sure what list your are pulling your opinion from. Edited December 30, 2019 by Phat Fingers 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phat Fingers Posted December 30, 2019 Share Posted December 30, 2019 13 hours ago, Elias Pettersson said: Well for sure he would have had some call ups at a minimum. His foot speed was never an issue in Junior. He's having issues now because of his knee and hip. I'm sure if he can finish out the year strong and a good summer workout with a skating coach he could have a shot next year at the big club. We will see. His vision and hockey IQ are already at an NHL level. Let's see if he can get that body to perform like his mind. It takes time to play into game shape. OJ isn't a NHL regular needing to recover, he has to recover, catch up and improve his physical abilities this year. That's alot to accomplish in one season. Given that he has managed to play in over 20 games, I expect that he has likely recovered fully, now he needs to catch up. A lot of Gym time off the ice with core strength as a focus I hope. Just send him to Hoglanders offseasons core strength training camp. Always room for another juggler. I am most interested is seeming how OJ finishes this season vs starting it. If he can reach the 50g mark with no significant games lost, it's a win. His offence is not in question, his IQ is excellent and he has been a good defender in other levels. That should catch up as he gains in strength and stamina. 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dpn1 Posted December 30, 2019 Share Posted December 30, 2019 6 hours ago, Herberts Vasiljevs said: Not saying I don't believe you but do you have a source for this? I'm just interested. Button is a bit of a dweeb but I tend to agree with him on a lot of things. He is on 1040 regularly and he discussed it sometime over the last few weeks. I can't remember what day it was though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted December 30, 2019 Share Posted December 30, 2019 1 minute ago, dpn1 said: He is on 1040 regularly and he discussed it sometime over the last few weeks. I can't remember what day it was though. I heard Button say that OJ, at this point, must be considered a bustaroo. He did clarify by saying OJ has injuries get in the way of his development though. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawdzukes Posted December 30, 2019 Share Posted December 30, 2019 1 hour ago, Phat Fingers said: It takes time to play into game shape. OJ isn't a NHL regular needing to recover, he has to recover, catch up and improve his physical abilities this year. That's alot to accomplish in one season. Given that he has managed to play in over 20 games, I expect that he has likely recovered fully, now he needs to catch up. A lot of Gym time off the ice with core strength as a focus I hope. Just send him to Hoglanders offseasons core strength training camp. Always room for another juggler. I am most interested is seeming how OJ finishes this season vs starting it. If he can reach the 50g mark with no significant games lost, it's a win. His offence is not in question, his IQ is excellent and he has been a good defender in other levels. That should catch up as he gains in strength and stamina. Ever since I've started watching him I've had serious questions about his understanding of how to pick up his check in front of the net and determine where and how to cover the cycle. I see him repeatedly leaving his post in front of the net and getting sucked out while an opponent is left wide open in the danger area. Similarly, I've seen him remain in front of the net, however, not really mark his check who still gets to puck and a chance on net(reminds me of a former player). Has anyone else noticed this or noticed if he has improved at all? I've only seen 2 games this year but these things are coachable. Anyways. Go Juo Go. I really hope he makes it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted December 30, 2019 Share Posted December 30, 2019 1 minute ago, Gawdzukes said: Ever since I've started watching him I've had serious questions about his understanding of how to pick up his check in front of the net and determine where and how to cover the cycle. I see him repeatedly leaving his post in front of the net and getting sucked out while an opponent is left wide open in the danger area. Similarly, I've seen him remain in front of the net, however, not really mark his check who still gets to puck and a chance on net(reminds me of a former player). Has anyone else noticed this or noticed if he has improved at all? I've only seen 2 games this year but these things are coachable. Anyways. Go Juo Go. I really hope he makes it. Yup. OJ sometimes gets out of position in the D zone. However, D can be taught. You can’t teach 6’3” 200 plus, high offensive skills, compete, and IQ. OJ is still physically and mentally maturing. He’s going to be one heck of a player. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawdzukes Posted December 30, 2019 Share Posted December 30, 2019 2 minutes ago, Alflives said: Yup. OJ sometimes gets out of position in the D zone. However, D can be taught. You can’t teach 6’3” 200 plus, high offensive skills, compete, and IQ. OJ is still physically and mentally maturing. He’s going to be one heck of a player. Cool. That's what I figure. He has all the tools to figure it out. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Alflives Posted December 30, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted December 30, 2019 Just now, Gawdzukes said: Cool. That's what I figure. He has all the tools to figure it out. Off topic. I wonder if the Christmas tree emoji will change to a bottle of bubbly now it’s almost New Years? 1 1 1 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoneypuckOverlord Posted December 30, 2019 Share Posted December 30, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, dpn1 said: He is on 1040 regularly and he discussed it sometime over the last few weeks. I can't remember what day it was though. he said that it's not wrong to consider him a bust or something like that, that was during his 4 weeks absence with his hip problem. btw, since he came back from that injury, he's played 11 games and has 8 points. so since coming back he has 8 points in 11 games. same guy that had jake virtanen ranked 41st in the draft. Now I am not trying disrespect him, but he's not always right either. Sure I understand he didn't like Virtanens game in 2014, but he is now smoking sam Bennet and Dal cole out of the park and has more points then both those guys combined, and he was drafted lower. Edited December 30, 2019 by MoneypuckOverlord 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawdzukes Posted December 30, 2019 Share Posted December 30, 2019 Just now, Alflives said: Off topic. I wonder if the Christmas tree emoji will change to a bottle of bubbly now it’s almost New Years? Or just an Alf emoji. Great idea Lol. I knew it wasn't to early. It's always 5:00 PM in Melmac! 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post KoreanHockeyFan Posted December 30, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted December 30, 2019 15 hours ago, Ihatetomatoes said: Yes you can. Its entirely possible he'd be in the NHL or its possible he'd still be developing in the AHL. Maybe have some call ups but I'm just not sold on Juolevi's foot speed being NHL caliber and I'm not sold that that's because of the injuries We're just starting to see Virtanen take some big steps in his development and the guy was drafted in 2014. How about we be fair and give Juolevi the same amount of patience. 3 2 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ballisticsports. Posted December 30, 2019 Share Posted December 30, 2019 1 hour ago, Alflives said: Yup. OJ sometimes gets out of position in the D zone. However, D can be taught. You can’t teach 6’3” 200 plus, high offensive skills, compete, and IQ. OJ is still physically and mentally maturing. He’s going to be one heck of a player. Alf, What happened with Pouliot then? He was considered that and a 8th OA Guddy was a 3 OA pick too He may turn into another Haydn Fleury 7OA too Until he proves himself as a bona fide NHL player, there is no point comparing him as heir to Edler who has proven himself The league is full of top draft picks who have failed NHL careers, it happens No point in bringing him into the NHL just because he was a 6th OA and he struggles and fails, best to let him get hopefully confidence playing AHL I bet Benning gets him into a few games this year to expose him on just what he needs to work on to be successful in the NHL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted December 30, 2019 Share Posted December 30, 2019 4 minutes ago, ba;;isticsports said: Alf, What happened with Pouliot then? He was considered that and a 8th OA Guddy was a 3 OA pick too He may turn into another Haydn Fleury 7OA too Until he proves himself as a bona fide NHL player, there is no point comparing him as heir to Edler who has proven himself The league is full of top draft picks who have failed NHL careers, it happens No point in bringing him into the NHL just because he was a 6th OA and he struggles and fails, best to let him get hopefully confidence playing AHL I bet Benning gets him into a few games this year to expose him on just what he needs to work on to be successful in the NHL Pouliot is a good comparable, but not Guddy. Pouliot has a very low hockey IQ. OJ’s hockey IQ is off the charts. Can’t teach processing things quickly. OJ will pick up on the subtle D parts of the game, and still have his elite offensive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawdzukes Posted December 30, 2019 Share Posted December 30, 2019 5 minutes ago, ba;;isticsports said: Alf, What happened with Pouliot then? He was considered that and a 8th OA Guddy was a 3 OA pick too He may turn into another Haydn Fleury 7OA too Until he proves himself as a bona fide NHL player, there is no point comparing him as heir to Edler who has proven himself The league is full of top draft picks who have failed NHL careers, it happens No point in bringing him into the NHL just because he was a 6th OA and he struggles and fails, best to let him get hopefully confidence playing AHL I bet Benning gets him into a few games this year to expose him on just what he needs to work on to be successful in the NHL This post really has no relation to his post, yeah, picks definitely fail but he has the underlying tool set for sure. Size, skating, smarts, poise, pedigree. I don't see him mentioning that he should be brought up. Like recent comments, if he can get 50 games in, hopefully playoffs, and start to make an impact defensively it would be a huge step in his development, and like you said a taste of NHL action would be great too. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Googlie Posted December 30, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted December 30, 2019 (edited) Some observations based on the 15 - 18 games I have watched on the TV package: > he is an elite passer with great vision - but ..... somewhat like Edler, he can slow the game down in the d-zone, always believing that he can outlet pass at any time. Most of the time he can, but maybe 10% of the time he gets enough pressure on him that he coughs up the puck with a forced pass to nowhere > skating speed really isn't an issue. Sure, he is not Bailey-fast, but isn't often beaten on an icing call. And on offensive carries, more than holds his own going up ice. > for a big body, doesn't hit often, but when he does, they are heavy hits > alluded to in earlier posts, but biggest issue seems to be positional awareness. Sometimes will go to cover the same man as his partner; can be slow to recognize a developing threat; will sometimes lose his man on a goal mouth scramble and end up behind the net covering nobody > offense is definitely his strength, but Cull is using him in all situations. - 1st unit PP, 1st unit PK and in regular 5 - 5's > hasn't jelled yet with any particular partner. Rafferty (pairing the best +/- with the worst) would be the most obvious, but both play a similar style, and Rafferty is partnering so well with Teves, so why break that up? So he gets a revolving series of Chatfield, Sautner, Beezer on the PP and occasionally Blujus Summarizing, he is no Jovocop or Salo, but probably an upgrade over Sbisa or Hutton. Hasn't dominated the AHL like Bobby Sanguinetti did in 14/15, (but that didnt earn him a promotion to the big club). He may be another Pouliot, but could well be a reliable 2nd or 3rd pairing defenseman. Edited December 30, 2019 by Googlie 1 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawdzukes Posted December 30, 2019 Share Posted December 30, 2019 40 minutes ago, Googlie said: Some observations based on the 15 - 18 games I have watched on the TV package: > he is an elite passer with great vision - but ..... somewhat like Edler, he can slow the game down in the d-zone, always believing that he can outlet pass at any time. Most of the time he can, but maybe 10% of the time he gets enough pressure on him that he coughs up the puck with a forced pass to nowhere > skating speed really isn't an issue. Sure, he is not Bailey-fast, but isn't often beaten on an icing call. And on offensive carries, more than holds his own going up ice. > for a big body, doesn't hit often, but when he does, they are heavy hits > alluded to in earlier posts, but biggest issue seems to be positional awareness. Sometimes will go to cover the same man as his partner; can be slow to recognize a developing threat; will sometimes lose his man on a goal mouth scramble and end up behind the net covering nobody > offense is definitely his strength, but Cull is using him in all situations. - 1st unit PP, 1st unit PK and in regular 5 - 5's > hasn't jelled yet with any particular partner. Rafferty (pairing the best +/- with the worst) would be the most obvious, but both play a similar style, and Rafferty is partnering so well with Teves, so why break that up? So he gets a revolving series of Chatfield, Sautner, Beezer on the PP and occasionally Blujus Summarizing, he is no Jovocop or Salo, but probably an upgrade over Sbisa or Hutton. Hasn't dominated the AHL like Bobby Sanguinetti did in 14/15, (but that didnt earn him a promotion to the big club). He may be another Pouliot, but could well be a reliable 2nd or 3rd pairing defenseman. Thanks Googlie. Upon reflection I guess if we get a 6"3 220 lb defender who plays for 10-12 years on the third line but still contributes 30-40 points it would still be helpful to the team. If his defence improves, which I sure hope it will. I still have hopes that it just clicks for him. Sooner than later though ... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now