cdubuya Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 if he's cheap then yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baka Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 Discounted yeah. You run no risk. If it doesn't work out it only hurts him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samurai Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 it seems like there are quite a few people on this post who regularly ask themselves - why does this always happen to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brian42 Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 Sbisa for Kane and Im happy to give it a shot. Any higher price no thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hatedkid666 Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 benning is all about character guys so i doubt it happens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stanky Legs Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 We NEED to get this guy. He's a game-changer. He also adds color to our team which we lack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueberries Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 26 minutes ago, -Vintage Canuck- said: The guy does have serious attitude issues that he needs to sort out, but he is still pretty young and could become a very good player in his prime. As long as the Canucks don't overpay or give up any valuable assets, I'm fine with that. This. If he gets it done on the ice, it doesn't matter what he does off it. We need goals period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Stammer- Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 I thought that Benning liked character guys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
appleboy Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 No we do not need another problem child. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Fig Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 I know a guy who is basically part of the Giants family, and he told me that all through the years, the only kid who he ever had a problem with was Kane. A snotty, self-entitled kid. These problems with the Jets and Sabres aren't something new, just escalated in nature measured against professional expectations. The look in the eyes of the Winnipeg players when they spoke about Kane as he departed that organization spoke volumes. He isn't a good pro, and maybe being so isn't important to him. Foisting that attitude on the Canucks at this point isn't a good idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaBamba Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 42 minutes ago, Fanaholic said: NEVER < NEVER > NEVER Dumbest idea ever. OMG, you think he is going to change here. I will never cheer for the Canucks if he ends up on this team. Strong words for a fanaholic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nux4lyfe Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 No! ..Too much baggage, I bet if he didn't make the coin he makes, He'd prob be in jail right now.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dorrcoq Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 Wasn't Buffalo his change of scenery? Punk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wren223 Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 No. Winnipeg couldn't pay us to take him. Cancer in the room, cancer on the team, cancer in the community. This management group moved out Kassian. They aren't about to take on Kane and is issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cramarossa Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 45 minutes ago, TheRussianRocket. said: Not sure if you read OP but I kind of went into that. ...considering he'd be back in Vancouver wanting to remake his image, not further damage it infront of family/friends, and set an example for the place he calls home - with all the character/leadership in the locker room (Twins, Eriksson, Hansen, Burrows, Dorsett, Bo, Edler, Tanev, Gudbranson etc etc), I just don't see how he doesn't change his ways. Worst case scenario IF he doesn't clean up his act, after this year the Canucks can look to trading Kane with him being on the last year of his deal. Could retain if need be as well. That's a lot of speculation. It's banking on the assumption that he thinks he has a problem and wants to resolve things. It's just as likely that he thinks he's fine or a victim in these scenarios. The same leadership was in place for Kassian and Hodgson, and we see how that turned out. Character can't always be absorbed through osmosis. It's a no from me, dawg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.B Cooper Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 41 minutes ago, -Vintage Canuck- said: The guy does have serious attitude issues that he needs to sort out, but he is still pretty young and could become a very good player in his prime. As long as the Canucks don't overpay or give up any valuable assets, I'm fine with that. This exactly. If he puts his issues behind him, what a deal. I would love to get him here. Personally, if he plays good, I don't care what he does outside of the rink. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thad Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 I would rather trade Sbisa for Kane than trade Tanev for Landeskog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris12345 Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 No, refer to Kassian HR file for further details. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toni Zamboni Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 not Bennings type of guy. so no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilbur Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 Dorsett for Kane and a 5th? I'm not surprised Buffalo is having issues with this kid, bad karma for their shameless tank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.