kenhodgejr Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 Benning said that they are still looking to acquire a rugged fast scoring winger through trade. I think Evander Kane could be a good fit. What other options for players who fit this profile are out there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remy Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 Gosh, if only there was a [discussion] thread for this already, something along the lines of - and I'm spit-balling here - "should the Canucks pursue Evander Kane?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenhodgejr Posted July 3, 2016 Author Share Posted July 3, 2016 This is a thread for what other options are out there? Chris Kreider maybe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HC20.0 Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 3 minutes ago, kenhodgejr said: This is a thread for what other options are out there? Chris Kreider maybe? I'd take Kreider in a heartbeat. I don't think the Rangers want to part with him though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aircool Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 8 minutes ago, kenhodgejr said: This is a thread for what other options are out there? LOL.... Here's an interesting idea... Asking this question in the Evander Kane thread? Formed in such a way as, "Since many people here think Evander Kane is pure cancer and should go freeze to death in the arctic, who should we trade for instead that plays similarly?" And then people would reply and talk about the various ways they would imagine Evander Kane dying, and CDC would be a much more cancerous place for it... See? Everyone wins! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 Landeskog would cost a bit but he should be our top target for players in that category. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenhodgejr Posted July 3, 2016 Author Share Posted July 3, 2016 Just now, Pears said: Landeskog would cost a bit but he should be our top target for players in that category. Why would Colorado want to trade Landeskog? Would Virtanen, Sbisa and 2017 2nd get it done? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aircool Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 1 minute ago, kenhodgejr said: Why would Colorado want to trade Landeskog? Would Virtanen, Sbisa and 2017 2nd get it done? LOL NO.... Remove Sbisa, add Horvat or Hutton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby_Lu1ngo Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 15 minutes ago, Aircool said: LOL.... Here's an interesting idea... Asking this question in the Evander Kane thread? Formed in such a way as, "Since many people here think Evander Kane is pure cancer and should go freeze to death in the arctic, who should we trade for instead that plays similarly?" And then people would reply and talk about the various ways they would imagine Evander Kane dying, and CDC would be a much more cancerous place for it... See? Everyone wins! Well considering he made the top about top 6 gritty wingers to go after in general why does this have to be in the Kane thread. Yeah he mentioned Kane but why should readers have to fish through a bunch of Kane garbage to talk about other players than Kane exactly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aircool Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 Its just not thread-worthy. But I was being very sarcastic and exaggerating.... I really don't care if 20 people on these forums make redundant threads every day.... Those people have problems, I don't need to be another one of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kesler'sselke Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 1 hour ago, Pears said: Landeskog would cost a bit but he should be our top target for players in that category. maybe if we are willing to part with tanev. Seeing what Oilers paid for Larsson that is not an impossible deal to happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Realtor Rod Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 Nail Yakupov? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shiftynifty Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 2 minutes ago, Realtor Rod said: Nail Yakupov? He could be a bargain bin "scoring" winger, but he's far from rugged. If the price is right, I could see Benning trying him out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Realtor Rod Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 11 minutes ago, Shiftynifty said: He could be a bargain bin "scoring" winger, but he's far from rugged. If the price is right, I could see Benning trying him out. Really though, how many rugged scoring wingers are there? Todd Bertuzzi still around? Ovie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MayRayDown Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 I don't see any trading partners for a 2nd line LWer Sedin-Sedin-Eriksson TRADE/Burrows-Sutter-Rodin Baertschi-Horvat-Hansen Etem-Grandlund-Dorsett The only thing I thought of was trading Hansen+ for a 2nd line LWer like Kreider but then I realized NYR have Zuccerallo, Hayes and Fast. Only 2nd line LWers I even see that could be available are Lee/Nelson or Hartnell. Or we could do something like Sedin-Sedin-Eriksson Baertschi-Horvat-Rodin TRADE/Burrows-Sutter-Hansen and then we could look into a 3rd line winger. I just don't see a trade happening unless it involves Burrows in which case you get a player like Hartnell back as a return Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 theminister had a good option - Paquette - from a deep Tampa team that has a lot of quality in their forward group but could stand to add to their blueline (proposed Pedan). of the remaining UFAs I like Lucas Lessio - imo could be a solid depth pickup at no asset cost. could always offer the Leafs a couple 7th round pickz for Komarov. the Leafs love their pickzz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aqua59 Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 8 hours ago, Aircool said: Its just not thread-worthy. But I was being very sarcastic and exaggerating.... I really don't care if 20 people on these forums make redundant threads every day.... Those people have problems, I don't need to be another one of them. Wow, you must be a member of that group called the spelling and grammar police. Let me tell you a little something. If you're judging people on how many threads one has and infer to them having problems? Your state of judgment is the real problem. Lighten up.Stop whining Thats a problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aircool Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 Just now, aqua59 said: Wow, you must be a member of that group called the spelling and grammar police. Let me tell you a little something. If you're judging people on how many threads one has and infer to them having problems? Your state of judgment is the real problem. Lighten up.Stop bitching. Thats a problem. LOL I even say in the post you quote I was being sarcastic and I was exaggerating in my previous post... You think that changed in this post? omg people on the internet. Ever heard of trolls? You're dealing with one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aqua59 Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 Just now, Aircool said: LOL I even say in the post you quote I was being sarcastic and I was exaggerating in my previous post... You think that changed in this post? omg people on the internet. Ever heard of trolls? You're dealing with one. Trolls? I'm calling you out after you try passively avoiding being held accountable on your judgement. You can't have it both ways. You day you were joking, you were being classic passive aggressive. I'm just joking so you're not offended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S.Mouse! Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 3 minutes ago, Aircool said: LOL I even say in the post you quote I was being sarcastic and I was exaggerating in my previous post... You think that changed in this post? omg people on the internet. Ever heard of trolls? You're dealing with one. The first rule of Trollclub is, You DO NOT speak about Trollclub! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.