TheRussianRocket. Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 http://theprovince.com/sports/hockey/nhl/vancouver-canucks/would-the-canucks-trade-alex-edler Quote Would the Canucks trade Alex Edler? The team has a lot of defencemen. Could they afford to do without their most experienced? Maybe, just maybe. Some of you would undoubtedly rejoice at the news. Grady Sas, who works at TSN 1050 in Toronto has some interesting news: But here’s the thing. Alex Edler, who yes, makes mistakes, is still a quality NHL defenceman. He’s also now the defence corps’ elder statesman, too. As Sas points out in his tweets, there’s no real Plan B for an Edler-less future. Ben Hutton, as we saw late in the season, isn’t there yet. He might be in a year, but given how players tend to at-best tread water in their second season, it’s not reasonable to expect him to be ready to carry heavy minutes. Luca Sbisa, as we’ve seen, is best suited to a 6/7 role. Nikita Tryamkin could turn into a top-pairing defenceman, but his late-season audition showed him to be still very rough around the edges. If you’re a team which is claiming to have the playoffs as a target, you can’t start the season with so many unknowns on the blue line. Edler is a known quantity. Maybe you move him as the season gets rolling and it turns out you’ve hit home runs on all your gambles: Ben Hutton has continued to improve; Tryamkin can carry heavy minutes and push play in the right direction, Andrey Pedan or Luca Sbisa are playing a sound game. Maybe, somehow, Olli Juolevi has surprised everyone and come out of training camp with a spot in the NHL lineup. Then, maybe, you would look at a trade. This is an added wrinkle from a knowledgable tweeter: Who knows what teams Edler would consider, but such a scenario would make things very tight. In other words, don’t hold your breath. Encouraging report. Like that management isn't satisfied with anything really and are open to all scenarios to improve the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RRypien37 Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 I would legitimately cry tears of joy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 If this is true then we either found a deal for that top six forward and/or Juolevi is the real deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Kane Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 > One of the worst/weakest defense corps in the NHL > Trade legitimate top 4 defenseman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goblix Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 Think Edler gets too much of a bad rap. he gives the puck away sometimes but still our best all arounder dman. Puts up around 40 points a year on a barren blueline. most of all though he's a good defenseman logging the ice time above his ability or paygrade. hes never been the problem and I think getting rid of him now is counter intuitive to having the Sedins on contract.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 If this is true, we would probably be trading for a more offensively minded replacement on that top pairing. This would be similar to the reported Tanev + for Subban deal that was offered... we have a solid D, but not not very well balanced as we could use more goals from that pairing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jam126 Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 That purplegrimace guy is sure a legit guy... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconuts Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 Grimace knows his stuff. Really though, not sure how I feel about this. I've no issue keeping Edler around at all, but who knows what we could get. Two teams ain't much to work with if it's even true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 The sources just get worse and worse as the summer goes along. I'll play along though. If it's Anaheim they can give us Theodore and Rackell or Silferberg. If it's Colorado they can give us Landeskog with a pick and a prospect added on our end. I highly doubt they've asked him to waive though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustABandwagoner Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 2 minutes ago, DeNiro said: The sources just get worse and worse as the summer goes along. I'll play along though. If it's Anaheim they can give us Theodore and Rackell or Silferberg. If it's Colorado they can give us Landeskog with a pick and a prospect added on our end. I highly doubt they've asked him to waive though. Edler + 2nd + which prospect hmmm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-Money Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 Short of generational players you just don't trade (McDavid, Crosby, etc) every team should have "internal discussions" about trading every single player in their organization. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 He also claims we were very close to signing Vermette; Quote Grady S @GradySas 11h11 hours ago I've heard from multiple sources now that the #Canucks were very close to inking Antoine Vermette, but the deal ultimately fell through. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 3 minutes ago, DontMessMe said: Edler + 2nd + which prospect hmmm. Probably Gaunce if it's for Landeskog, which I'd have no problem doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RRypien37 Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 15 minutes ago, goblix said: Think Edler gets too much of a bad rap. he gives the puck away sometimes but still our best all arounder dman. Puts up around 40 points a year on a barren blueline. most of all though he's a good defenseman logging the ice time above his ability or paygrade. hes never been the problem and I think getting rid of him now is counter intuitive to having the Sedins on contract.. The difference between Edler and being classified as a top guy is consistency. He has none. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 I wonder if the Avs would be willing to trade Zadorov. A bottom pair of Zadorov and Tryamkin would be pretty menacing. Hutton Tanev Sbisa Gudbranson Zadorov Tryamkin Definitely one of the harder hitting D cores in the league. Not sure how much offense it would provide though. Get them to throw in Grigerenko too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeltaSwede Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 So, sophomore Hutton would be playing on the 1st pairing, followed by Tryamkin and Sbisa.. The left side has never looked better. Sure it's an option, but the timing is way off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry Goose Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 meh. I like edler with a Canucks uni Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GettinGuddyWithIt Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 17 minutes ago, DeNiro said: I wonder if the Avs would be willing to trade Zadorov. A bottom pair of Zadorov and Tryamkin would be pretty menacing. Hutton Tanev Sbisa Gudbranson Zadorov Tryamkin Definitely one of the harder hitting D cores in the league. Not sure how much offense it would provide though. Get them to throw in Grigerenko too. Hutton isn't ready to be a top pairing dman especially in his sophomore season. If we were to move Edler I'd expect a top pair or top 4 coming back. Edler + 2nd for Ekholm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 1 minute ago, DeltaSwede said: So, sophomore Hutton would be playing on the 1st pairing, followed by Tryamkin and Sbisa.. The left side has never looked better. Sure it's an option, but the timing is way off. There will never be a good time to trade Edler as long as we're still trying to compete. The question management has to ask is are they willing to trade him while he still has value or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeltaSwede Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 1 minute ago, DeNiro said: There will never be a good time to trade Edler as long as we're still trying to compete. The question management has to ask is are they willing to trade him while he still has value or not. I'd say there are better times to trade Edler atleast that would actually make sense instead of at the end of an offseason. Trade deadline if the Canucks are out of the race, or at the draft so they would have an entire summer to look at finding somewhat of a replacement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.