davidtriemstra Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 If the Canucks miraculously got him ... And barring we don't trade any current players ... Then our line up would be: sedin-sedin-ericksson baertschi-horvat-kucherov rodin/etem-sutter-hansen burrows-granlund-dorsett gaunce >Virtanen would then be in Utica priming his game for a top 6 role while getting 20+ min per game dont see it happening though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 5 hours ago, Kokanee king said: still, he signed a contract and then bailed on the team that made him wealthy. what about Radulov and Kovalchuk and there is this too http://www.thehockeynews.com/news/article/fetisov-seeks-to-block-players-leaving-for-nhl-after-being-elected-to-khl-board-of-directors I don't care about those two. We are talking about Datsyuk. Guy gave everything to Detroit and left for family reasons if I recall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knucks16 Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 13 hours ago, Camel Toe Drag said: Stop doing winky faces like that. It's immature and is starting to creep me out. Plus if your going to swear (which I don't condone on CDC) learn to spell the word right. Other than that, good talk and keep doing what your doing. Lol huhhhhhhh....... Okie dokie! lmao;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustABandwagoner Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 On 9/7/2016 at 7:24 PM, Bur14Kes17 said: If the cost is Boeser Virtanen and a 1st there's no way we should do that deal. Boeser alone may end up being as good as Kucherov and Virtanen really seems like he's put on the work this summer and grown up a bit. I'd do Virtanen and a 1st or Boeser and a 2nd but that's it Tampa will say no They'd prob demand Boeser + 1st rounder and maybe something else too. its gonna be an overpayment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bur14Kes17 Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 On 9/8/2016 at 3:37 PM, Kokanee king said: nothing to do with racism i was talking about how the Russians have a tendency to jump ship to the KHL. you know like Datsyuk who left his team with nothing. BUR14KES17 is just a dumb ass. Id go on an defend myself and point out your ignorance and biased stupidity towards russians and datsyuk but it looks like the rest of cdc has done that for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbyg43 Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 Why not scout the hell out of KHL this year an find the next Kucherov an try draft him in 2017 draft? otherwise the cost is not conducive to moving forward with team depth by giving up the prospects an the farm been there done that . one poster digested two D a pick an throw in Burrows an perhaps Hansen an retain some of Burrows cap to make it work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kokanee king Posted September 12, 2016 Share Posted September 12, 2016 On 9/9/2016 at 7:29 PM, N7Nucks said: I don't care about those two. We are talking about Datsyuk. Guy gave everything to Detroit and left for family reasons if I recall. we were talking about D-bag Russians that bail on the signed contracts. it would be different if Datsyuk did not sign in the K but he did. That's a douche bag move. play out the contract you sign for millions. i believe he had kids before signing for millions. he could of even asked to be traded so the wings would get a kings ransom for him and then retire. back to my original point of not trusting Russian player and because datsyuk bailed anyone of them could bail. i bet a lot of Russians kids look up to Datsyuk. maybe it could open the flood gates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bllewellyn Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 To Tampa virtanen tanev Hansen next years seconder & the torts pick to van kucherov Vans lineup sedins Erickson bear bo kuchervov granland sutter rodin Etem graunce Dorset defence edler. Stetcher hutton grud pizza try/ Larsen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Just offer sheet him and have done with it. 7 years, $7.5m - something the Bolts simply cannot match. We'd have to be cap-creative, but we could work something out for opening night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 4 minutes ago, Captain Azzy said: Just offer sheet him and have done with it. 7 years, $7.5m - something the Bolts simply cannot match. We'd have to be cap-creative, but we could work something out for opening night. 7.5 is the perfect number too. It would require a 1st 2nd and 3rd pick. Any more and it would be 2 1st a 2nd and a 3rd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 15 minutes ago, Gooseberries said: 7.5 is the perfect number too. It would require a 1st 2nd and 3rd pick. Any more and it would be 2 1st a 2nd and a 3rd. For 5 years - total value of 37.5M. But if he prefers to sign for 7 years (ie 52.5M) it would be 4 x 1st. Compensation is AAV over maximum 5 years even if the contract is longer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 5 minutes ago, mll said: For 5 years - total value of 37.5M. But if he prefers to sign for 7 years (ie 52.5M) it would be 4 x 1st. Compensation is AAV over maximum 5 years even if the contract is longer. Did not know that. So for example if you offer sheet 10 mill (nice easy mumber) Over 7 years the aav counts as 14 for compensation instead of 10? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 46 minutes ago, Gooseberries said: Did not know that. So for example if you offer sheet 10 mill (nice easy mumber) Over 7 years the aav counts as 14 for compensation instead of 10? Correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 1 hour ago, mll said: For 5 years - total value of 37.5M. But if he prefers to sign for 7 years (ie 52.5M) it would be 4 x 1st. Compensation is AAV over maximum 5 years even if the contract is longer. Wonderful CBA we have It's all moot anyway, Kucherov will sign with the Bolts - I just wish we would go for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackhawksdown Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Offer sheet sounds way beťter than trading our best dman or this years eventual Hobey Baker Award winner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.