cripplereh Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 To improve our team a LW scorer would be awesome but who of these or others would you want and why??? me any of these would be good ,but means we would have to give up lots!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HerrDrFunk Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 If ifs and buts were candy and nuts... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dabeast Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 Tatar is the only semi-realistic one, and I doubt that would happen too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaku Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 Landeskog, the kid is big, got a wonderful mean streak, capable of scoring goals, making plays, mature and is a work horse. He's capable of 60+ points a season. He will be a 20 goal 55+ point player this season and he's 23. He's going to be unreal when he's 26-27. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckylager Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 Which we want and which we should go after, are actually two different polls. Want - Landy, but I want a Ferrari too, just don't have the assets. Well, my wife would kill me if I sold the house for a car. Who we could go after, realistically, without hurting our D corps..- ... Bernier My tune might change IF our defense is actually really good. Wait for Christmas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted September 27, 2016 Author Share Posted September 27, 2016 yes depending on how you look at it and I think if our D group looks as good as most think , then by all means go after a young LWer to make us better!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRAZY_4_NAZZY Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 Virtanen technically did play the left side sometimes in Junior. He isn't a top six option yet, but definitely should be tried to see if he can play that side too in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted September 27, 2016 Author Share Posted September 27, 2016 I agree and do not see why he can not slot in if baer is on the second,he could be the third!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Western Red Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 I chose Palat. Whats his value in comparison to Landeskog? That being said/asked, I'm very curious to see how what we have pans out, give it until Christmas, maybe US Thanksgiving. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 We should be getting a young (elite) centre. Sam Reinhart is the guy we should get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billabong Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 I have palat as the most plausible because tb won't be able to re-sign everyone so I think he'll be the odd one out obviously we all want landeskog but I doubt that'll happen. to van: palat to tb: Hansen, gaunce, 3rd pick 2017 Note: col should have more interest in edler because they already have Barrie and Johnson on the right side so tanev plays on the 3rd pair? Nah I think Tanev is valued way higher though but col may consider edler as the focal point if landeskog is indeed in play to col: edler, boeser, gaunce/hansen to van: landeskog its a pipe dream Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odjick_fan Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 Right now, I jus hope they decide on something, cuz I been waiting all summer to find out who would be the new LWer. As a faithful Canuck fan, I will continue to wait lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 41 minutes ago, billabong said: I have palat as the most plausible because tb won't be able to re-sign everyone so I think he'll be the odd one out obviously we all want landeskog but I doubt that'll happen. to van: palat to tb: Hansen, gaunce, 3rd pick 2017 Note: col should have more interest in edler because they already have Barrie and Johnson on the right side so tanev plays on the 3rd pair? Nah I think Tanev is valued way higher though but col may consider edler as the focal point if landeskog is indeed in play to col: edler, boeser, gaunce/hansen to van: landeskog its a pipe dream why are your trades all massive overpayments no way wed offer 3 pieces for one player especially when boeser could possibly be a first line winger no way benning would ever do these trades Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drsofthands Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 8 hours ago, canuktravella said: why are your trades all massive overpayments no way wed offer 3 pieces for one player especially when boeser could possibly be a first line winger no way benning would ever do these trades Thats not an overpayment, guys like Landeskog have extreme value. Boeser is just a prospect, Landeskog is a proven star on a good contract. You're probably just used to spare parts trades. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbyg43 Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 33 minutes ago, drsofthands said: Thats not an overpayment, guys like Landeskog have extreme value. Boeser is just a prospect, Landeskog is a proven star on a good contract. You're probably just used to spare parts trades. In two years we would not have to search out trades like this as Boesr is gonna make it redundant mark my words. however in interim transition cannot see JB giving away all the depth that he is building for one player. I would go first and a D man from roster now , otherwise I am waiting for later in season when teams panic an start selling off assets. Tanev and a second may get it done? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ojibwa72 Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 Palat is the only reasonable one with our Tradeable assets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billabong Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 3 hours ago, drsofthands said: Thats not an overpayment, guys like Landeskog have extreme value. Boeser is just a prospect, Landeskog is a proven star on a good contract. You're probably just used to spare parts trades. Exactly! Boeser hasn't proven anything at the pro level and landeskog is a young physical 60 point player those don't fall off trees Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-Dizzle Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 Max Domi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 7 hours ago, drsofthands said: Thats not an overpayment, guys like Landeskog have extreme value. Boeser is just a prospect, Landeskog is a proven star on a good contract. You're probably just used to spare parts trades. sorry edler is a top two dman on cheap contract boeser could be better than landeskog in a few yrs and you want to give them a first rounder on top sorry no thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blömqvist Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 I feel like, becaue organizational need, the only way we get Landeskog is if a LHD is going to Colorado. How we get in on that without giving up Hutton or Juolevi, well that's where we need to get creative. ANA: Tanev COL: Fowler or Lindholm VAN: Landeskog Then adjust value. I just don't see the Avalanche adding to their RHD when they have Johnson and Barrie already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.e88928f62331b6643b264e6d36b523a0.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.