• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.
Sign in to follow this  
Mackcanuck

[Report]Mark Jankowski called up by CGY

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, RRypien37 said:

 

Dude...these are lines from Trailer Park Boys.....:picard:

Clearly intelligent television for the betterment of mankind. 

 

Excelsior!

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, StraightFlush said:

Clearly intelligent television for the betterment of mankind. 

 

Excelsior!

 

Yes, my noble scholar. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, ForsbergTheGreat said:

Oversold him in an understatement. 

In 10 years, Feaster predicted, "Jankowski will be viewed as the best player in the 2012 draft," adding "We felt we could take the gamble."

 

Flames were in position to pick up some really good players that are already good players in the NHL.  It's not that people think Jankowski is a complete bust it's more about how the flames completely missed the boat on that draft

 

 

I would almost be surprised if Jankowski does not get a two or three year run to carve out a career?

 

Feaster is long gone.  So who cares if he made an arse of himself back then. Jankowski will not be what he said.

 

At this stage he's still a 6'3" near 220 lb C with NHL speed & soft hands. He deserves a call up for good play in the AHL. 

 

Joe Colburne is also gone. Don't be surprised if he jumps up the depth chart. There are guys like Hamilton, Vey & Stajan "quote" / "unquote" ahead of him. There is room. I give him a better shot than Shinkaruk.

 

Edited by Canuck Surfer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would take a gamble on him.  flip them greiner and 5th :DDDDDDDD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Rush17 said:

I would take a gamble on him.  flip them greiner and 5th :DDDDDDDD

Lol that'd be nice.. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What a failure. He didn't light it up in his first nhl game. Trade him for whatever, he sucks, he is terrible..:P

Edited by Ryan Strome
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.