J.I.A.H.N Posted December 6, 2016 Author Share Posted December 6, 2016 Tell me how not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danjr Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 I wish I had more minuses for this thread. Might have to come revisit it for the 12 days of Xmas. One the first day of X-mas I gave you a -1 On the 2nd day of Xmas I gave you 2 mean quotes and a -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robvp Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 1 hour ago, janisahockeynut said: I get that J-23, but this game is changing fast....most young players are playing a fast north still game, the Sedin's are not doing either, how do you think they will look in 2 or 4 years........? They'll look pretty good on the 2nd line with reduced minutes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beni Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 More likely 3rd line type minutes 3-4 years from now. I dont expect they will ever be traded. Unless some magic is worked at the 2018 TDL and they land on a serious contender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry Goose Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 Opinion #1 makes no explicit mention of, and if it does it only trivially acknowledges the leadership the Sedins have with the Canucks. They show what it takes to succeed, and that has value to the team. Being successful in the future isn't going to hinge on whatever you get back for the Sedins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggins Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 Here's my redundant answer to this: Benning: "As long as I'm GM the Sedins won't be asked to waive their no trade clause" The Sedins: "We want to retire Canucks" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coastal.view Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 waste of a read redundant and you cannot retain more than 50% of cap retaining 14 million in 1 year is impossible write something meaningful if you are going to post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 My feeling is if the twins are open to being on different lines there's no reason they can't stay for 1 or 2 more years after this contact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiDeN Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 I don't think there is a team out there that could offer something worth trading them for AND fit them under the cap. The only way I can see it being even possible is if we retained most of their salary and were compensated with some amazing prospects and picks from a team looking to stack themselves going in to the playoffs. As has been said, this is completely redundant, because Linden and ownership simply wouldn't allow it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
189lb enforcers? Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 Naslund 2.0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.I.A.H.N Posted December 7, 2016 Author Share Posted December 7, 2016 10 hours ago, coastal.view said: waste of a read redundant and you cannot retain more than 50% of cap retaining 14 million in 1 year is impossible write something meaningful if you are going to post Do you know why I like you Coastal? It is because you are such a deep thinker! Watch my hands Coastal..........now watch them........ here it goes............. So you have 2 Sedins @ 7 million aside = 14 million.......keep watching..........now we retain 50% of both their contracts.......keeeep watching...............now you take on a real bad contract that the players isn't worth even close to what he is getting paid(say Last years Sbisa $3.5 million ) at full pop................keep watching.......................then they give you a scrub 4th liner ( That's 1 million )...................and presto, binga, banga boom.............the teams cost of the Sedin's is 2.5 million for 2 X 7 million dollar contracts That's someone paying a net cost of 2,5 million on 14 million........................did you see it? Ahhhhh, you weren't watching! Typical! And I suggest you do the same! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.