• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.
Ossi Vaananen

[Cleared Waivers] Leafs D Frank Corrado

Recommended Posts

Well since guddy still has his wrist/hand in a splint for 4-5 weeks now leads me to believe he's probably out until for another month if not the entire year so there is room for corrado

 

edler-stetcher

tryamkin-tanev

sbisa-corrado

larsen-biega

 

Hutton and guddy IR 

 

if all healthy. Which would be a miracle. Then someone has to get moved 

 

edler-stetcher

Tryamkin-tanev

hutton-gudbranson

corrado-biega

 

trade sbisa and waive larsen. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Alflives said:

Don't we have first dibs, because he was claimed from our putting him on waivers?

I've tried (albeit not very hard) to confirm this. Someone will undoubtedly. I think hes an upgrade. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they'd done it last year it would have made sense to claim him back. If we were the only team to do so we could have sent him directly to Utica. Once last season was over though, we lost that ability to claim him back and send him directly to Utica, so I doubt we see Benning put in a claim.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be ok with picking him and waiving Larsen but it's such a lateral move that it really doesn't make any sense. Why shake up the room like that for a #8 dman when Larsen can ride the pine just fine once Hutton comes back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't see the Canucks claiming Corrado. Depth on D is our strength. I'd rather have us eye the forwards on the waiver wire. Besides, Reid Boucher still needs to get into the lineup... Like that'll ever happen *sadface*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, elvis15 said:

If they'd done it last year it would have made sense to claim him back. If we were the only team to do so we could have sent him directly to Utica. Once last season was over though, we lost that ability to claim him back and send him directly to Utica, so I doubt we see Benning put in a claim.

Well that sucks. I was assuming that we could snatch him back and send him straight ti Utica. Too bad,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He's worth a flyer just like anyone else that's on waivers. But he was going to be on his way to Utica if the Laughs hadn't claimed him. He would fit in well here tbh. Will get a chance to develop alongside Tram, Stecher, Hutton,Guddy when all healthy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Warhippy said:

Another black mark against the Laffs.  They literally wasted a year of this kids life jerking him around.

 

What a frigging joke

oh yea.....but they can eff me over for $750k

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope he gets picked up by a team that needs him and will give him a chance to play. Then I hope he makes the most of the chance.

 

It will suck if he goes unclaimed because it is just a giant reminder that he has been wasted the last two years by a team that didn't really want to play him but didn't want to risk losing him either.

 

I wish him luck and hope someone picks him up. If we were going to be able to use him I would take a flier on him. But we really don't have the room and he doesn't need to sit in another press box.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I say we pick him up and put him in minors if we still get priority.

He's our asset even if he's not a regular NHL'er yet. He was part of our system until he was stolen. He has some promise to become a bottom pairing d-man and he would be nice to have in utica to play with Subban and push for playoffs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not overly surprised he cleared.  CDC has this romanticized view of the kid but maybe there's a reason beyond "the leafs are evil and Babcock hates him" that he hasn't managed to earn any playing time

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, Pears said:

Probs gonna do the same with Marchenko tbh. Guarantee any other team does this they'd have gotten some kind of penalty by now. 

Well hold on...we're trying that experiment out with Reid Boucher

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure why we wouldn't claim him and get rid of Larsen given our coach insists on playing the human pylon.

Edited by King Heffy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, King Heffy said:

Not sure why we wouldn't claim him and get rid of Larsen given our coach insists on playing the human pylon.

Marchenko is more of the same of what the Canucks already have. The hope with Larsen was that he could be at least an effective PP specialist. So far he hasn't been very good but I don't think they are giving up on him yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, hammertime said:

So I'm guessing he cleared????

Yes he has cleared. 

I bet a trade is made though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/5/2017 at 2:05 AM, Provost said:

Nope, I believe there is a time or game limit rule (don't know the exact threshold off hand)... like the player has to be waived again within 30 days for that to be in effect.

Then it's gotta be the time rule, the kid played less than an AHL call up in Toronto.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.