Canucks Curse Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 3 minutes ago, Salacious Crumb said: Did you just call him Jannet? Hansen would look good in Pittsburgh or Washington... Action Hansen Jannik Jackson agree with Pitt and wash but think Pitt needs d men Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flickyoursedin Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 8 minutes ago, LaBamba said: Hansen's value will never be as high as it is right now. This is the truth right here so sell sell sell! Come on Benning shock the world again! Hansen for Fiala. Or Hansen for Clague and a couple picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RRypien37 Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 If Hansen can get a 1st or a top prospect like Bowey I would be very pleased with this TDL overall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaBamba Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 3 minutes ago, DeNiro said: Good thing about Hansen is that the pressure isn't on JB to trade him since he has another year. Would be different if he was a pending UFA. I'm sure teams will try some low ball offers leading up to the deadline though. He's gotta stick to his guns. As far as exposure goes in the expansion draft, he might as well be a UFA. We can't protect him without losing gran or Sven. He can be used as a rental as well. The team acquiring him just has to leave him unprotected to be rid of his contract. No way Vegas wouldn't take him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HomeBrew Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 46 minutes ago, LaBamba said: As far as exposure goes in the expansion draft, he might as well be a UFA. We can't protect him without losing gran or Sven. He can be used as a rental as well. The team acquiring him just has to leave him unprotected to be rid of his contract. No way Vegas wouldn't take him. That could be good or bad in terms of finding a trade partner. Someone might pay for the playoff rental and in terms of saving their current roster from losing any players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 Considering what Burrows just netted us, I think it's pretty obvious that "taking what we can get" for Hansen would be an absolutely laughable decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 The return should be better than burrows. Just need to find a playoff team with cap space and likely wanting to protect Hansen in the ED. If they can find a team or two like that then we should net an even better prospect from that team. I am all for getting a prospect over a pick. Will be 1 or 2 years ahead in development atleast. Also like getting a prospect playing in Europe allows us to bring them to Utica sooner possibly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hortankin Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 possible Hansen returns? WSH: Bowey (plus pick?) NYR: 1st + prospect MTL: Juulsen or Sergachev? id add a pick if Sergachev was possible CHI: Schmaltz + 1st you better believe there is going to be a big bidding war on Hansen after the return we got from Burrows. Benning is going to win a lot of haters over today.. I always believed in Benning!!! 2020 baby!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EagleShield Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 Just now, 48MPHSlapShot said: Considering what Burrows just netted us, I think it's pretty obvious that "taking what we can get" for Hansen would be an absolutely laughable decision. Hanzal, Eaves, Burrows, Boyle... Overpaymemt is in the air. And Hansen is on the Hanzal end of that group. Hansen and Virtanen for Pouliot, 1st, 3rd? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hortankin Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 1 hour ago, Canucks Curse said: Action Hansen Jannik Jackson agree with Pitt and wash but think Pitt needs d men Sbisa? Edler? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 1 minute ago, EagleShield said: Hanzal, Eaves, Burrows, Boyle... Overpaymemt is in the air. And Hansen is on the Hanzal end of that group. Hansen and Virtanen for Pouliot, 1st, 3rd? i dont think pouliot has that kind of value anymore. I could be wrong but he hasnt been able to crack their lineup with all their D injuries. If we acquired him would he not need protection in the expansion draft also? Definitely dont want a prospect who needs that coming back for hansen unless they are an upgrade over a different forward of ours Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaBamba Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 6 minutes ago, 48MPHSlapShot said: Considering what Burrows just netted us, I think it's pretty obvious that "taking what we can get" for Hansen would be an absolutely laughable decision. What is it going to take for you to fully comprehend the Hansen situation? If you haven't already, Google expansion draft rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VegasCanuck Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 2 minutes ago, Hortankin said: Sbisa? Edler? I won't be surprised if we move a D before the deadline. I don't think it will be Edler as full NTC and has stated that he doesn't want to leave. Who really knows though, things change! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 How about Hansen to the NYI? They have been making a push lately since the coaching change Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyBoy44 Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 1 minute ago, Yotes said: How about Hansen to the NYI? They have been making a push lately since the coaching change I just don't see Islanders on list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattrek Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 5 hours ago, Nicklas Bo Hunter said: Great with markstrom hurt miller will most likely not be traded. Another year of no trades. How do you want your crow served? We can do it raw, BBQ or roasted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 1 hour ago, LaBamba said: As far as exposure goes in the expansion draft, he might as well be a UFA. We can't protect him without losing gran or Sven. He can be used as a rental as well. The team acquiring him just has to leave him unprotected to be rid of his contract. No way Vegas wouldn't take him. 6 hours ago, J.R. said: I honestly think they'd take Gaunce over Hansen. If Sbisa's available, they'd grab him (unless we send a 3rd/4th/prospect etc to get them to take Gaunce instead). Gaunce - solid young guy with size and leadership who's a very controllable RFA vs a 30+ lifer vet with an NTC and goes UFA next year, coming off an injury plagued year... I mean I loves me some Honey Badger and he's a heck of a player but that's a bit risky if I'm the LVK GM... 6 hours ago, J.R. said: NTC 6 hours ago, J.R. said: I could easily see him not wanting to move his family 3 times in 2 years and put VAN, WPG and 6 teams that wouldn't want him on his 8 team list. 6 hours ago, J.R. said: No, he'd be going UFA and probably attempting to go back to VAN or WPG netting Vegas exactly nothing but 1 year of his services. Maybe MIN too. 6 hours ago, J.R. said: I'm more concerned with us moving a D to either protect Sbisa (or move him) than the forwards. Not so sure I agree on your order of forwards though. If I can't make moves ahead of the ED, I'd expose Hansen/trade him for the peanuts everyone wants to inexplicably move him for now. If Baer's concussion symptoms linger, we may not have to protect him though. *Silver linings* 6 hours ago, J.R. said: Sbisa doesn't have an NTC and if they can't re-sign, can be traded to all those teams now short of #4 D for good value. Hansen, likely not so much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyIe Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 13 minutes ago, Hortankin said: possible Hansen returns? WSH: Bowey (plus pick?) NYR: 1st + prospect MTL: Juulsen or Sergachev? id add a pick if Sergachev was possible CHI: Schmaltz + 1st you better believe there is going to be a big bidding war on Hansen after the return we got from Burrows. Benning is going to win a lot of haters over today.. I always believed in Benning!!! 2020 baby!!! Hate to be a downer but none of those scenarios seem likely. Hard to see any of those teams giving away grade A prospects and adding something on top of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 3 minutes ago, RyIe said: Hate to be a downer but none of those scenarios seem likely. Hard to see any of those teams giving away grade A prospects and adding something on top of that. Agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hortankin Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 5 minutes ago, RyIe said: Hate to be a downer but none of those scenarios seem likely. Hard to see any of those teams giving away grade A prospects and adding something on top of that. some thought Burrows would fetch a 3rd at best.. its a sellers market this year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.