thejazz97 Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris12345 Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 This'll be good. How about a D like Edler? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b3. Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 Doesn't make a lot of sense with the ED coming... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohmy Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 As long as it's for a young promising forward then I don't mind it even though I like Hutty. I would be trying to trade with the Islanders. There's a lot to like over there depending on who's available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReggieBush Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 No thank you. I'd rather keep @orcasgonewild gf's ex. On a serious note, I would rather not move hutton unless it is for someone really good. I can stomach waiting for Boeser Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dekey Pete Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 5 minutes ago, J.R. said: Doesn't make a lot of sense with the ED coming... unless it's for another player that isn't eligible for the ED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker 67 Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 Canucks can afford trading a LHD, but I was hoping it would be Edler or Sbisa. I wonder what kind of forward help they could get for a 2nd year kid who's struggled this season? Tempering my expectations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry Goose Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 kind if has been a rumour for awhile hasnt it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Weasel Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 Hutton + for duchene or landeskog, but they'll probably want tanev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 2 minutes ago, The Sedge said: unless it's for another player that isn't eligible for the ED There's of course that. Doesn't help with our protection issues though. And losing another D in the ED suddenly puts us short if Hutton's gone too. Also not sure Hutton alone gets you the caliber of forward I'd actually want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 1 minute ago, The Weasel said: Hutton + for duchene or landeskog, but they'll probably want tanev. Actually they'd probably want hutton more. Younger, doesn't require and expansion spot, has more overall game potential and has the left handed shot they are looking for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billabong Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 It really depends for who. If it's Kane then stop right there. id rather get a pick for sbisa and keep Hutton and the core top 6 UNLESS we can package up tanev + for drouin/draisaitl. Edler-stetcher tryamkin-tanev hutton-gudbranson pedan-biega if guddy wants 5m then he's gone too imo id go 4.5mx3yrs but we haven't seen enough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HerrDrFunk Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 The only D I would mind them trading at this point is Tryamkin. All our other D have someone on the team, or in the Canucks' system, who could replace them if need be. When it comes to Traymkin's size though: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChuckNORRIS4Cup Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 With Stamkos starting to skate again Tampa maybe interested in moving someone for Hutton. Another team that is looking for D would be Dallas, but after acquiring Hamhuis they may not want another Canuck D lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoughtysCheck Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 8 minutes ago, The Weasel said: Hutton + for duchene or landeskog, but they'll probably want tanev. ya hutton+horvat for one on those guys... are you serious dude. Hutton wouldn't be the main piece in acquiring one of those guys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 6 minutes ago, ForsbergTheGreat said: Actually they'd probably want hutton more. Younger, doesn't require and expansion spot, has more overall game potential and has the left handed shot they are looking for. Maybe Hutton's value is at its highest right now, because he is not ED eligible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 4 minutes ago, J.R. said: There's of course that. Doesn't help with our protection issues though. And losing another D in the ED suddenly puts us short if Hutton's gone too. Also not sure Hutton alone gets you the caliber of forward I'd actually want. What if....and this is a big what if.. but what if JB already has a deal in place where Vegas gets a a pick 3rd round pick as long as they take a player like Gaunce, all so that we can protect our D (sbisa). If that's the case I can see them being ok moving a player like Hutton. Hutton alone wont get it, but (another what if) you trade Hansen for a late 1st/2nd round pick and then send that pick along with Hutton + Baertschi/ Granlund. That's getting closer to Landeskog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 Just to be clear... Mackenzie didn't say it was a rumour, just that it was something that could make sense. He makes it very clear when he is saying there is a rumour and when he is just spitballing. One you can take to the bank, and the other is just filling air time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris12345 Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 1 minute ago, Alflives said: Maybe Hutton's value is at its highest right now, because he is not ED eligible? 100% but trade depreciating assets regardless of the return. Keep appreciating assets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.