Fat_Pun Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 edler would get to go to a contender, who could use another top-4 d-man with all the injuries on their blue line. we could trade miller for a picks/prospects/whatever and replace him with fleury. edler and fleury have similar contracts (no trade clauses), the annual cap hit is similar and the remainder of the term is similar. our goalie depth would be fleury (stanely cup champion), markstrom (who needs to play more!!) and demko (who's the real deal). and we have enough depth on d with the emergence of stetcher, tryamkin and hutton, drafting Juolevi ,and the possibility of gudbranson re-singing for a few years, to loose edler and his contract. if fleury takes miller's job as our starter for the 17/18 season, we wont have to spend money on re-signing him, and we'd have a #1 goalie, which would save us from having to find one in free agency or trading for one if the club isnt confident enough to hand markstrom the reigns for next year. anyway, this is my first proposal, i'll probably get flamed, just wondering what you guys thought Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHL rocks Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 You want to give away your best overall dman for a goalie no team would take off the Penguins for free? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 5 minutes ago, WHL rocks said: You're want to give away your best overall dman for a goalie no team would take off the Penguins for free? Agreed..Pens gotta add a heavy sweetener. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 You want to give up our #2 defender for a goalie that'll be bought out? We would also have to expose Marky in the expansion draft if we do that, which isn't happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 7 minutes ago, Stamkos said: You want to give up our #2 defender for a goalie that'll be bought out? We would also have to expose Marky in the expansion draft if we do that, which isn't happening. 15 minutes ago, WHL rocks said: You want to give away your best overall dman for a goalie no team would take off the Penguins for free? These. This proposal couldn't have made less sense. Not only would we be giving away our top pair defenseman we'd also be losing Markstrom for nothing. Horrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammertime Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 2 minutes ago, Nuxfanabroad said: Agreed..Pens gotta add a heavy sweetener. A spoon full of sugar helps the Fleury go down. Miller to Pens for MAF + Sprong + 1st Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mathew Barzal Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Dude, Fleury is like a leakier version of Luongo. People would HATE him here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Building Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Ew. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twilight Sparkle Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 trade a minute man for a sieve. tough call Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucklehead80 Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Even though MAF would have to submit an extensive list of teams he'd be willing to go to (18 teams as per CapFriendly), what makes Van appealing to a Stanley Cup winner? If it's just a chance to be the starter, I could see that, but if he wants to win then he's going to have to wait awhile. By the time we are competitive enough to contend he may be in the same situation that he is now with Murray, only here with Demko. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Where's Wellwood Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 2 hours ago, Stamkos said: You want to give up our #2 defender for a goalie that'll be bought out? We would also have to expose Marky in the expansion draft if we do that, which isn't happening. 1 hour ago, Pears said: These. This proposal couldn't have made less sense. Not only would we be giving away our top pair defenseman we'd also be losing Markstrom for nothing. Horrible. I disagree with this proposal but the Markstrom exposure isn't true. We protect Markstrom and expose Bachman. Even if we kept Miller he doesn't count as an exposed goalie because he's a 2017 UFA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy Kneel Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 2 hours ago, hammertime said: Miller to Pens for MAF + Sprong + 1st I'd do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glory_Days Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 If we were competing...still no, MAF chokes in playoffs, one really good playoffs, every other time has been horrible, hell he lost his job last year to Murray because of it and that rookie goalie helped Pens win the cup. So...NO, why saddle ourselves with his contract/salary when Canucks aren't competing for the next couple years. Makes no sense, at all, for either team. Pens don't want a $6mil Edler, that team is all about quick transition, lmao, Edler can't do that. Plus they want the salary to keep other players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Maata's going on LTIR. They get 4M off the books. Edler for Pouliot straight up. We retain about 1M of Edler's cap so he can squeeze in. Maybe we give them Subban or a mid to late pick as well if they want. Pouliot is sheltered over there and needs a change in scenery desperately. Early to mid 20s, and was once considered the best young D-man in the world. Juolevi - Stecher Pouliot - Tryamkin Hutton - Gudbranson Pretty damn good future defence with Sbisa to boot. Makes Hutton very expendable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jägermeister Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 This proposal is genuinely terrible at every level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 7 hours ago, Where's Wellwood said: I disagree with this proposal but the Markstrom exposure isn't true. We protect Markstrom and expose Bachman. Even if we kept Miller he doesn't count as an exposed goalie because he's a 2017 UFA. MAF has a no movement clause so he has to be protected. That's why the Penguins are trying so hard to get rid of him, so they can protect Murray Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flickyoursedin Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Pittsburgh has a 5.75 million dollar backup and are hurting for quality dmen and the best deal you could come up with for us is a one for one swap. If we are doing pitts this big of a favour I'd want their 1rst round pick or Sprong coming back with our new 5.75 million dollar backup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apollo Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 I say yes if they add Malkin at 50% retained Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.