morrissex95 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 To Vancouver: Buffalo's 1st Round Draft Pick in 2017 Minnesota's 2nd Round Draft Pick in 2017 Buffalo's 2nd Round Draft Pick in 2017 RW Hudson Fasching To Buffalo: D Chris Tanev What do you guys think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJDDawg Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 Would rather have those as 2018 picks as it's supposed to be a much better draft class. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckmen84 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 If buffalo is willing to pay that then yes please, but they wouldn't as they are rebuilding still aswell. Two top 10 picks this year would help speed up the rebuild for sure. Hudson Fasching doesn't look like an appealing prospect to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 26 minutes ago, morrissex95 said: To Vancouver: Buffalo's 1st Round Draft Pick in 2017 Minnesota's 2nd Round Draft Pick in 2017 Buffalo's 2nd Round Draft Pick in 2017 RW Hudson Fasching To Buffalo: D Chris Tanev What do you guys think? Sounds very fair actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diesel_3 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 Like the idea of offloading a solid asset like Tanev for a stock pile of picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lockhart Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 I'd rather trade Tanev for an established young forward or blue chip prospect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil_314 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 I'll just let @SabreFan1 give his two cents. In short, Tanev isn't in the age range of D-men they'd want, and esp. not for a steep price like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChampStatus Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 1 hour ago, morrissex95 said: To Vancouver: Buffalo's 1st Round Draft Pick in 2017 Minnesota's 2nd Round Draft Pick in 2017 Buffalo's 2nd Round Draft Pick in 2017 RW Hudson Fasching To Buffalo: D Chris Tanev Remove Hudson Fasching and add: Buffalo's 3ed round draft pick 2017 Washington's 3ed round draft pick 2017 Buffalo's 4th round draft pick 2017 Buffalo's 6th round draft pick 2017 Buffalo's 7th round draft pick 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fanuck Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 Tanev is much more valuable to a team close to contention or there already. If we don't deal him this off-season then hold on to him until the TDL next season and soak some contending team for a 1st (if we're lucky) or a blue-chip prospect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrissex95 Posted April 11, 2017 Author Share Posted April 11, 2017 It's not that steep of a price for Buffalo. This a thin draft but we're likely picking in the top 3, getting another top 10 pick to nab a guy like Liljegren or Foote would be great for the future of this franchise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrissex95 Posted April 11, 2017 Author Share Posted April 11, 2017 PS whoever gave me a negative rep for this post can go f*** themselves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 I think you're overvaluing Tanev big time here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 20 minutes ago, qwijibo said: I think you're overvaluing Tanev big time here. More feasible than Vrbata at 50% coming off a 30 goal season for Tom Gilbert. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SabreFan1 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 1 hour ago, Phil_314 said: I'll just let @SabreFan1 give his two cents.In short, Tanev isn't in the age range of D-men they'd want, and esp. not for a steep price like that. This. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrissex95 Posted April 11, 2017 Author Share Posted April 11, 2017 I guess we'll see if and where Tanev goes in the offseason. If Buffalo isn't interested maybe Tampa Bay would be a good landing spot. Probably better trading partners for us now that they're done their rebuild plus they've got two 2nd rounders this year(I believe) So: To Tampa Bay: D Chris Tanev To Vancouver: Tampa Bay's 1st Round Draft Pick in 2017 Toronto's 2nd Round Draft Pick in 2017 Tampa Bay's 2nd Round Draft Pick in 2017 What do you guys think? Better deal than the Buffalo one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 1 hour ago, Pears said: More feasible than Vrbata at 50% coming off a 30 goal season for Tom Gilbert. Thew suggestion was Gilbert and a 2nd. and was based on the production Vrbata put up last year, which was minimal. Remind me again what Vancouver ended up getting for him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fanuck Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 1 hour ago, morrissex95 said: PS whoever gave me a negative rep for this post can go f*** themselves 26 minutes ago, morrissex95 said: What do you guys think? Better deal than the Buffalo one? Ummm.....you want people to comment on your proposal but tell them to eff off if they don't agree with you......? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckmen84 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 23 minutes ago, morrissex95 said: I guess we'll see if and where Tanev goes in the offseason. If Buffalo isn't interested maybe Tampa Bay would be a good landing spot. Probably better trading partners for us now that they're done their rebuild plus they've got two 2nd rounders this year(I believe) So: To Tampa Bay: D Chris Tanev To Vancouver: Tampa Bay's 1st Round Draft Pick in 2017 Toronto's 2nd Round Draft Pick in 2017 Tampa Bay's 2nd Round Draft Pick in 2017 What do you guys think? Better deal than the Buffalo one? Perhaps a 1st and a 2nd is more realistic (unless Tampa wins the lottery) IMO. If we are trading with Tampa i would target Palat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billabong Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 Probably a 2nd pick too much for tanev. remember buffalo wanted a lefty with ristolainnen and bogosian already in the mix BUT!!! I've thought about a similar trade. buf is proably gonna slot in 6,7 or 8. 1. Patrick 2. Hischier 3. Valardi 4. Mittelstadt 5. Tippett 6. Liljegren 7. Necas 8. Glass/Rasmussen if the canucks can 2 of those guys then this draft is a huge win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrissex95 Posted April 12, 2017 Author Share Posted April 12, 2017 5 hours ago, Fanuck said: Ummm.....you want people to comment on your proposal but tell them to eff off if they don't agree with you......? He gave me a negative reputation, bro. So yeah, he can go F*** himself whoever that was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.