• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      All Threads Must Contain Tags!   07/25/2017

      ALL THREADS MUST CONTAIN TAGS   All threads in this forum must contain tags prefixed to topic titles. The purpose of the tags is to eliminate confusion in recent threads lists, and to create an organized and consistent environment. Moderators may immediately lock and thread that does not contain tags.    Tags must be placed at the start of your thread title, following this exact formatting:    [Tag] Thread Title   Here are some of the most used popular tags:    [Proposal]
      A trade, or trades, for next season, or even the off-season.
      [Off-Season]
      FA signings, off-season trades for RFA's, UFA's rights etc...
      [Value Of]
      (A question regarding a players worth, whether from another team, or the Canucks)
      [Speculation] Posting a rumor (with a source of course), but providing why it could be possible for the Canucks to land that player.   [Discussion]
      Thoughts on team trading strategy and composition.   Please feel free to create your own tag if none of these suit your thread.   
Sign in to follow this  
morrissex95

[PROPOSAL] Vancouver-Buffalo

Recommended Posts

To Vancouver:

Buffalo's 1st Round Draft Pick in 2017

Minnesota's 2nd Round Draft Pick in 2017

Buffalo's 2nd Round Draft Pick in 2017
RW Hudson Fasching 

 

To Buffalo: 

D Chris Tanev

 

What do you guys think? 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would rather have those as 2018 picks as it's supposed to be a much better draft class.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If buffalo is willing to pay that then yes please, but they wouldn't as they are rebuilding still aswell.

Two top 10 picks this year would help speed up the rebuild for sure.

Hudson Fasching doesn't look like an appealing prospect to me. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, morrissex95 said:

To Vancouver:

Buffalo's 1st Round Draft Pick in 2017

Minnesota's 2nd Round Draft Pick in 2017

Buffalo's 2nd Round Draft Pick in 2017
RW Hudson Fasching 

 

To Buffalo: 

D Chris Tanev

 

What do you guys think? 

Sounds very fair actually. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like the idea of offloading a solid asset like Tanev for a stock pile of picks.

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd rather trade Tanev for an established young forward or blue chip prospect.

Edited by Lockhart
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll just let @SabreFan1 give his two cents.

In short, Tanev isn't in the age range of D-men they'd want, and esp. not for a steep price like that.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, morrissex95 said:

To Vancouver:

Buffalo's 1st Round Draft Pick in 2017

Minnesota's 2nd Round Draft Pick in 2017

Buffalo's 2nd Round Draft Pick in 2017
RW Hudson Fasching 

 

To Buffalo: 

D Chris Tanev

Remove Hudson Fasching and add:
Buffalo's 3ed round draft pick 2017

Washington's 3ed round draft pick 2017

Buffalo's 4th round draft pick 2017

Buffalo's 6th round draft pick 2017

Buffalo's 7th round draft pick 2017

 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tanev is much more valuable to a team close to contention or there already.  If we don't deal him this off-season then hold on to him until the TDL next season and soak some contending team for a 1st (if we're lucky) or a blue-chip prospect. 

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not that steep of a price for Buffalo. 

 

This a thin draft but we're likely picking in the top 3, getting another top 10 pick to nab a guy like Liljegren or Foote would be great for the future of this franchise. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, qwijibo said:

I think you're overvaluing Tanev big time here. 

More feasible than Vrbata at 50% coming off a 30 goal season for Tom Gilbert. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Phil_314 said:

I'll just let @SabreFan1 give his two cents.

In short, Tanev isn't in the age range of D-men they'd want, and esp. not for a steep price like that.  

This.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess we'll see if and where Tanev goes in the offseason. 

 

If Buffalo isn't interested maybe Tampa Bay would be a good landing spot. Probably better trading partners for us now that they're done their rebuild plus they've got two 2nd rounders this year(I believe) 

 

So: 

 

To Tampa Bay:

D Chris Tanev

 

To Vancouver:

Tampa Bay's 1st Round Draft Pick in 2017

Toronto's 2nd Round Draft Pick in 2017

Tampa Bay's 2nd Round Draft Pick in 2017

 

What do you guys think? Better deal than the Buffalo one? 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Pears said:

More feasible than Vrbata at 50% coming off a 30 goal season for Tom Gilbert. 

Thew suggestion was Gilbert and a 2nd. and was based on the production Vrbata put up last year, which was minimal.  Remind me again what Vancouver ended up getting for him?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, morrissex95 said:

PS whoever gave me a negative rep for this post can go f*** themselves 

 

26 minutes ago, morrissex95 said:

What do you guys think? Better deal than the Buffalo one?

Ummm.....you want people to comment on your proposal but tell them to eff off if they don't agree with you......? 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, morrissex95 said:

I guess we'll see if and where Tanev goes in the offseason. 

 

If Buffalo isn't interested maybe Tampa Bay would be a good landing spot. Probably better trading partners for us now that they're done their rebuild plus they've got two 2nd rounders this year(I believe) 

 

So: 

 

To Tampa Bay:

D Chris Tanev

 

To Vancouver:

Tampa Bay's 1st Round Draft Pick in 2017

Toronto's 2nd Round Draft Pick in 2017

Tampa Bay's 2nd Round Draft Pick in 2017

 

What do you guys think? Better deal than the Buffalo one? 

 

Perhaps a 1st and a 2nd is more realistic (unless Tampa wins the lottery) IMO.

If we are trading with Tampa i would target Palat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably a 2nd pick too much for tanev.

 

remember buffalo wanted a lefty with ristolainnen and bogosian already in the mix BUT!!! I've thought about a similar trade.

 

buf is proably gonna slot in 6,7 or 8. 

 

1. Patrick 

2. Hischier

3. Valardi

4. Mittelstadt

5. Tippett

6. Liljegren

7. Necas

8. Glass/Rasmussen 

 

if the canucks can 2 of those guys then this draft is a huge win. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Fanuck said:

 

Ummm.....you want people to comment on your proposal but tell them to eff off if they don't agree with you......? 

He gave me a negative reputation, bro.

 

So yeah, he can go F*** himself whoever that was. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.