Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Enter Search Term. Use arrows to navigate between autocomplete results. If no results appear, use Enter to do a full site search.
Forum Closure ×
Canucks Community
Forum Closure

WCF: (P1) Anaheim Ducks vs. (WC2) Nashville Predators | Predators win series 4-2

-Vintage Canuck-

2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs | Round 3   

126 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will win the series?

    • Ducks in 4
      0
    • Ducks in 5
      2
    • Ducks in 6
      12
    • Ducks in 7
      15
    • Predators in 4
      1
    • Predators in 5
      7
    • Predators in 6
      59
    • Predators in 7
      26

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

canuck73_3 Canucks Hall-of-Famer

canuck73_3

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, darnucks said:

You mean the allowed goal that Nashville scored? The other one was disallowed because the player ran into Gibson, he wasn't pushed.

The first disallowed goal lindholm backed into Zolnierczyk. The second one I'm not sure anymore because similar plays have been called goals he was certainly angled but not pushed in by the defenseman. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
alt kilgore Canucks Franchise Player

alt kilgore

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, darnucks said:

Not a hockey play when you run the goalie after he makes the save. It's considered goalie interference.

Going hard to the net is still allowed. I thought he tried to stop after the shot and then jump over him as best he could. Gibson looked like he got shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Squamfan Canucks First-Line

Squamfan

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, NZCanuck said:

I don't think the 2 disallowed goals should have counted but it's a bit off that when the Ducks scored similar goals against the Oilers they counted.

its called cali dicking riding. gary loves his cali team

Link to comment
Share on other sites
darnucks Abbotsford Regular

darnucks

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, canuck73_3 said:

The first disallowed goal lindholm backed into Zolnierczyk. The second one I'm not sure anymore because similar plays have been called goals he was certainly angled but not pushed in by the defenseman. 

Zolnierczyk tried to squeeze his way through between Lindholm and Gibson by going through the crease, definitely a no goal. Second one he wasn't angled into the goalie, he could have gone straight past instead of cutting through the crease. NBC feed also called both as being obvious no goals, I far enjoy watching them than CBC. They seem to know the rules unlike too many of the CBC schmucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
darnucks Abbotsford Regular

darnucks

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, kilgore said:

Going hard to the net is still allowed. I thought he tried to stop after the shot and then jump over him as best he could. Gibson looked like he got shot.

It is still allowed and if he had scored it would not have been a penalty. But he ran the goalie after the save which equals goalie interference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
McDavyCrockett Abbotsford Prospect

McDavyCrockett

Posted
Posted
On 2017-05-12 at 11:37 PM, YummyCakeFace said:

Why would you hate your fan base?  The league tried from start to finish to hand the series to Anaheim. In the coming years, no one, not even Bettman with Daly and their corrupt cronies will be able to stop that juggernaut.  This coming from a dyed in the wool Nux fan. 

Officiating sucked ballz....but officiating isn't what cost us game 7.

 

Oilers fans are just being petty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
canuck73_3 Canucks Hall-of-Famer

canuck73_3

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, darnucks said:

Zolnierczyk tried to squeeze his way through between Lindholm and Gibson by going through the crease, definitely a no goal. Second one he wasn't angled into the goalie, he could have gone straight past instead of cutting through the crease. NBC feed also called both as being obvious no goals, I far enjoy watching them than CBC. They seem to know the rules unlike too many of the CBC schmucks.

Completely disagree on the first one. Lindholm knew what he was doing and pushed him in. 

 

The second goal I've seen similar goals count, the NHL needs to work on consistency with no goal calls. I'm ok with that being a no goal call so long as that play is a no goal every time. Currently it is not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...