Podz92 Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 Can't believe Scott Cullen believes Toronto could pry Tanev away from the Canucks with Connor Carrick, Brendan Leipsic. And a first round pick. http://www.tsn.ca/radio/vancouver-1040-i-1410/cullen-can-see-tanev-to-toronto-for-leipsic-carrick-pick-1.749237 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
10pavelbure96 Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 I think that's fair value, similar to Shattenkirk. People here way overvalue Tanev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 2 minutes ago, JamesBlondage said: Can't believe Scott Cullen believes Toronto could pry Tanev away from the Canucks with Connor Carrick, Brendan Leipsic. And a first round pick. http://www.tsn.ca/radio/vancouver-1040-i-1410/cullen-can-see-tanev-to-toronto-for-leipsic-carrick-pick-1.749237 I guess you missed his TSN team off season review where he slotted them in to his projected lines. We covered how laughable that was. But we also covered how Toronto makes a lot of sense based on Tanevs age, being an RHD their need for a D of his calibre and skill set but also the fact his contract is nice and he's a local boy. Kapanen and a 1st or Nylander and a 2nd. Scraps don't get it done and this is literally no different than Dregers tampering of the Sedins or his endless years of suggesting player X Y or Z to the Canucks for a return that leaves the Canucks gaping or somehow props up the most insignificant Leafs player in to a future HOF star speculations Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy Kneel Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 When Tanev is in he's great (plus 3 on a very bad team this year) but maybe in the east he won't get run as much as the west. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HerrDrFunk Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 Just now, Warhippy said: I guess you missed his TSN team off season review where he slotted them in to his projected lines. We covered how laughable that was. But we also covered how Toronto makes a lot of sense based on Tanevs age, being an RHD their need for a D of his calibre and skill set but also the fact his contract is nice and he's a local boy. Kapanen and a 1st or Nylander and a 2nd. Scraps don't get it done and this is literally no different than Dregers tampering of the Sedins or his endless years of suggesting player X Y or Z to the Canucks for a return that leaves the Canucks gaping or somehow props up the most insignificant Leafs player in to a future HOF star speculations If any trade with Toronto doesn't at least begin with Kapanen, I'd hang up the phone immediately if I was Benning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HKSR Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 Kapanen, Carrick and a 1st I could see being the value. Carrick adds very little to the trade, but Kapanen and a 1st are valuable assets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fanuck Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 4 minutes ago, Warhippy said: I guess you missed his TSN team off season review where he slotted them in to his projected lines. We covered how laughable that was. But we also covered how Toronto makes a lot of sense based on Tanevs age, being an RHD their need for a D of his calibre and skill set but also the fact his contract is nice and he's a local boy. Kapanen and a 1st or Nylander and a 2nd. Scraps don't get it done and this is literally no different than Dregers tampering of the Sedins or his endless years of suggesting player X Y or Z to the Canucks for a return that leaves the Canucks gaping or somehow props up the most insignificant Leafs player in to a future HOF star speculations JB should take either one of those offers in a heartbeat - although I don't see Lou easily parting ways with Nylander. Kapanen I could see being expendable in TO however. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slegr Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 I do not like them, Slegr-I-am. I do not like TSN & Scott Cullen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Stammer- Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 7 minutes ago, Warhippy said: I guess you missed his TSN team off season review where he slotted them in to his projected lines. We covered how laughable that was. But we also covered how Toronto makes a lot of sense based on Tanevs age, being an RHD their need for a D of his calibre and skill set but also the fact his contract is nice and he's a local boy. Kapanen and a 1st or Nylander and a 2nd. Scraps don't get it done and this is literally no different than Dregers tampering of the Sedins or his endless years of suggesting player X Y or Z to the Canucks for a return that leaves the Canucks gaping or somehow props up the most insignificant Leafs player in to a future HOF star speculations no way Toronto gets rid of a 61 point scoring 21 year old AND a 2nd round pick for Tanev. I know that they want to upgrade the right side but Nylander will not be in play Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UFCanuck Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 2 minutes ago, Slegr said: I do not like them, Slegr-I-am. I do not like TSN & Scott Cullen. Reminds me of us Offering Raymond, Ballard and a 1st(25-29) for Legit Superstar. TSN will always overvalue Leaf players. That clown Jeff O'niell thinks Matthews is the best player in the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 Honestly, I'd consider doing that deal. Not totally sold on Carrick, but we'd be getting a mid-late 1st and a pretty solid winger prospect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker 67 Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 It's not crazy. Carrick is a 23-year old RHD with similar numbers to Tanev. Leipsic is a 22-year old LW who was over a point a game with the Marlies. In his 6 NHL games with the Leafs he got 3 points. Plus TOR's 1st. That would give us two 1sts. They're not stars, but they're young and could become good players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 1 hour ago, HerrDrFunk said: If any trade with Toronto doesn't at least begin with Kapanen, I'd hang up the phone immediately if I was Benning. Agreed. Toronto has a need, Tanev fills it. We don`t need to trade Tanev so we`re not in a rush to sell low 57 minutes ago, Fanuck said: JB should take either one of those offers in a heartbeat - although I don't see Lou easily parting ways with Nylander. Kapanen I could see being expendable in TO however. I 100% agree, if either of those deals presented itself Benning would/should jump on it. 52 minutes ago, -Stammer- said: no way Toronto gets rid of a 61 point scoring 21 year old AND a 2nd round pick for Tanev. I know that they want to upgrade the right side but Nylander will not be in play As above, Toronto has a serious need. They barely squeaked in to the playoffs, Tanev could possibly have saved them 10-15 goals against based on his defensive play alone netting what, 2-4 more wins; not to mention the playoffs. While I don't think that Lou/Shanaplan would simply sluff off Nylander that way; he was buried for a decent amount of the season in the bottom 6 and benched a few times. We're in no rush to trade Tanev; certainly not before the expansion draft at least. But without question not for the return of a questionable D man and LW that at NHL ready size are actually smaller than the Makar that some people say is too small for the league; that could spend their careers between the bench and the AHL and a middling 1st that Cullen is suggesting or pushing Edit** This isn't to say Leipsic's offensive talent isn't intriguing. I just think he'd end up an endless project forced to play a 2 way game and end up very larsen like in vancouver Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odd. Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 If Leipsic, Carrick, and a 1st round pick is the return, take it and run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 Kapanen, Dermott, and 1st, and I'll drive Tanev to the Airport. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odd. Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 1 minute ago, Ghostsof1915 said: Kapanen, Dermott, and 1st, and I'll drive Tanev to the Airport. Good luck with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 2 minutes ago, Odd. said: Good luck with that. Traffic to the airport or the trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHitman Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 Nylander and a second would be awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odd. Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 Just now, Ghostsof1915 said: Traffic to the airport or the trade. Idk, both? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shiznak Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 I would mind that return. Would rather have Andrew Nielsen, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.