Pears Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 Tanev for Kapanen, Leipsic, and a 1st would be fair. That's probably the best deal we could get for Tanev if it's not a Drouin-calibre player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noble 6 Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 The only way I would move Tanev to Toronto is if Nylander is coming back, even if we have to add a bit. I don't think Kapanen will be anything special and the Leafs already have Marner - Nylander - Brown on RW, so moving Kapanen would be more of a favour for them. They're gonna have to load up the back end at some point to become a real powerhouse. If anyone understands this, it's Lou. Tanev is too great of a fit in Toronto for them given his contract and role. I'm not saying it would be easy to get Nylander, but he's the only piece from Toronto that would make moving Tanev worth it. To TOR: Tanev 2nd Round Pick 2017 (CBJ) Granlund To VAN: Nylander TOR Defense: Reilly - Tanev Gardiner - Zaitsev Marincin - Polak/Carrick VAN Forwards: Sedin - Sedin - Eriksson Goldobin - Horvat - Nylander Baertschi - Sutter - Boeser Cramarossa - Gaunce - Dorsett *Rough lineup, obviously not 100% accurate but the general idea. VAN Future Forwards: ________ - Horvat - Boeser Virtanen - Nylander - Goldobin Dahlen - Gaudette - Lockwood _________ - Gaunce - _________ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReggieBush Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 Tanev for Marner straight up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 People should get off of the Rychel train IMHO. He can't skate well enough to be an NHL player, let alone top 6 or 9, and his consistency of effort is very poor. He's a marginal prospect ATM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamJamIam Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 7 minutes ago, Horvat is a Boss said: The only way I would move Tanev to Toronto is if Nylander is coming back, even if we have to add a bit. I don't think Kapanen will be anything special and the Leafs already have Marner - Nylander - Brown on RW, so moving Kapanen would be more of a favour for them. They're gonna have to load up the back end at some point to become a real powerhouse. If anyone understands this, it's Lou. Tanev is too great of a fit in Toronto for them given his contract and role. I'm not saying it would be easy to get Nylander, but he's the only piece from Toronto that would make moving Tanev worth it. To TOR: Tanev 2nd Round Pick 2017 (CBJ) Granlund To VAN: Nylander You're the guy who comes in 30th when he plays GM mode on the NHL games, aren't you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xbox Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 Work with TB for Drouin plz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billabong Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 After watching the playoffs. Nylander has much more jam and strength to his game than I thought which has sold me on this kid if he could play in the west. BUT come on people he had 61 points! As a rookie! He would have led or tied the Canucks in goals, assists and beaten horvat by 9 points! Theres no way tor is giving him up kapanen is the guy that could be had to tor: tanev to van: kapanen, 1st pick 2017(17th overall) Open and shut case johnson! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freaky Freak Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 1 hour ago, Warhippy said: I guess you missed his TSN team off season review where he slotted them in to his projected lines. We covered how laughable that was. But we also covered how Toronto makes a lot of sense based on Tanevs age, being an RHD their need for a D of his calibre and skill set but also the fact his contract is nice and he's a local boy. Kapanen and a 1st or Nylander and a 2nd. Scraps don't get it done and this is literally no different than Dregers tampering of the Sedins or his endless years of suggesting player X Y or Z to the Canucks for a return that leaves the Canucks gaping or somehow props up the most insignificant Leafs player in to a future HOF star speculations Heard the 1040 interview He said Leipsic or Kapenen it did not matter but because of the green factor (Portland) he put in Leipsic in Carrick is the likely (more of a guaranteed NHLer) but that Dermott or Nielsen are more upside so he put in Carrick (but a 5/6 Dman) And the 1st is a for sure So you can pick the forward outa the 2 and the D outa the 3 He also said KR could be the thro in as a sweetener as he has been past over in the TO depth chart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebreh Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 JB should announce that Tanev is on the block at the draft to get a bidding war. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kungfudru Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 1 hour ago, 48MPHSlapShot said: Nearly every single mock draft had Virtanen ahead of Nylander. It's amazing how many people start claiming to be right when they have the benefit of hindsight. I knew that I personally wanted Nylander that's all I'm saying. Whether anyone cares to believe that or not I really don't care. I was just upset that we didn't choose him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noble 6 Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 26 minutes ago, SamJamIam said: You're the guy who comes in 30th when he plays GM mode on the NHL games, aren't you? I wouldn't mind coming in 30th or 31st next year, that's the point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 4 minutes ago, Horvat is a Boss said: I wouldn't mind coming in 30th or 31st next year, that's the point. If we come in 31st...hell we might actually draft 3rd over all!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toews Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 Kapanen is tearing it up in the AHL playoffs against a very good Syracuse team as well. Tanev for Kapanen, Carrick and a 1st (#17) seems fair from both sides. Anything less is not worth it for the Canucks and I suspect this might already be a little rich for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 2 hours ago, 10pavelbure96 said: I think that's fair value, similar to Shattenkirk. People here way overvalue Tanev. ...and overhate on Toronto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
24K PureCool Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 TBH, sounds about right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riffraff Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 2 hours ago, Warhippy said: I guess you missed his TSN team off season review where he slotted them in to his projected lines. We covered how laughable that was. But we also covered how Toronto makes a lot of sense based on Tanevs age, being an RHD their need for a D of his calibre and skill set but also the fact his contract is nice and he's a local boy. Kapanen and a 1st or Nylander and a 2nd. Scraps don't get it done and this is literally no different than Dregers tampering of the Sedins or his endless years of suggesting player X Y or Z to the Canucks for a return that leaves the Canucks gaping or somehow props up the most insignificant Leafs player in to a future HOF star speculations Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 2 hours ago, 10pavelbure96 said: I think that's fair value, similar to Shattenkirk. People here way overvalue Tanev. Not exactly. Shattenkirk was the top rental on the market at the trade deadline and St. Louis had no problem moving him, whereas with Tanev he's a top 5-10 defensive defensman on a good contract and is still fairly young, and we're not exactly in a hurry to trade him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustABandwagoner Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 48 minutes ago, Horvat is a Boss said: The only way I would move Tanev to Toronto is if Nylander is coming back, even if we have to add a bit. I don't think Kapanen will be anything special and the Leafs already have Marner - Nylander - Brown on RW, so moving Kapanen would be more of a favour for them. They're gonna have to load up the back end at some point to become a real powerhouse. If anyone understands this, it's Lou. Tanev is too great of a fit in Toronto for them given his contract and role. I'm not saying it would be easy to get Nylander, but he's the only piece from Toronto that would make moving Tanev worth it. To TOR: Tanev 2nd Round Pick 2017 (CBJ) Granlund To VAN: Nylander TOR Defense: Reilly - Tanev Gardiner - Zaitsev Marincin - Polak/Carrick VAN Forwards: Sedin - Sedin - Eriksson Goldobin - Horvat - Nylander Baertschi - Sutter - Boeser Cramarossa - Gaunce - Dorsett *Rough lineup, obviously not 100% accurate but the general idea. VAN Future Forwards: ________ - Horvat - Boeser Virtanen - Nylander - Goldobin Dahlen - Gaudette - Lockwood _________ - Gaunce - _________ I would do something similar Tanev Granlund 2nd (Vancouver) 4th SJS Or absolute best Tanev Granlund 2nd (Vancouver) 2nd (CBJ) For Nylander <3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 2 hours ago, Slegr said: I do not like them, Slegr-I-am. I do not like TSN & Scott Cullen. Should we, could we Tans-trade, one vote & could they, would they With a goat?!(we got pics)... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sugar baby watermelon Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 1 hour ago, Kungfudru said: I know this horse has been beaten to death but what joke that we didn't pick Nylander when he was right in our laps. I wanted to destroy my t.v when I heard the other guys name if i had a dime for every time I heard we should have picked Nylander haha.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.