coryberg Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 17 minutes ago, Darth Kane said: Yaaaaaa, I don't think so. Yaaaaaa, I don't think so either. Let them choke on that idiot contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soosoodeff Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 edler no.2 no ty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHitman Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 I could see Arizona taking him on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 22 minutes ago, TheHitman said: I could see Arizona taking him on. He's gotta waive in order to go anywhere, no? Doubt he waives for anywhere but a contender. Maybe for his hometown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHitman Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 2 minutes ago, DeNiro said: He's gotta waive in order to go anywhere, no? Doubt he waives for anywhere but a contender. Maybe for his hometown. Arizona's probably a contender with him in the picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
k_man08 Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 If this can be a three way deal where we trade tanev and get back a pick from one team, and a prospect fro. Another then I'd do it. Chicago gets tanev Other team gets Seabrook We get pick from chi/other team + we get prospect from chi/other team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squamfan Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 On 6/9/2017 at 10:13 PM, The Weasel said: why would we take on old man seabrook when we're rebuilding? same reason we took erikkson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chickenman92 Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Seabrook is far too good for Benning to go after. Benning only likes to deal for spar parts or D that can't make a 3 foot pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Dreger today on TSN1050 thinks that the most likely to be moved is Hjalmarsson and not Seabrook and says he's hearing that he has already given a list of teams. He does not have a full NMC (10 teams trade list) and his contract is more attractive - 4.1M for two more seasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HC20.0 Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 3 minutes ago, S'all Good Man said: I mean, with that contract of his, he's not going anywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 16 minutes ago, HC20.0 said: I mean, with that contract of his, he's not going anywhere. that and he's still a great player! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.