Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Report] Dion Phaneuf has submitted his 12 team list


Recommended Posts

Just now, Ghostsof1915 said:

Wait, didn't they say he refused to waive a few days ago? Maybe Benning should try to waive Edler then? 

I believe that was just waiving his no-move for the purpose of the expansion draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ghostsof1915 said:

Wait, didn't they say he refused to waive a few days ago? Maybe Benning should try to waive Edler then? 

He refused to waive for the expansion draft, meaning, he didn't want to be possibly selected by Las Vegas.  His NMC is set up differently than Edlar's NTC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, thundernuts said:

He refused to waive for the expansion draft, meaning, he didn't want to be possibly selected by Las Vegas.  His NMC is set up differently than Edlar's NTC.

Yes, because the team doesn't have to protect Edler in the expansion draft. It's not a NMC, it's an NTC. Reverse MAF then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said:

Yes, because the team doesn't have to protect Edler in the expansion draft. It's not a NMC, it's an NTC. 

The team does need to use one of it's protected spots on Edler because he does have a NTC.

 

(Edit) /nevermind - you're correct.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've been through this. 

https://www.nhl.com/news/nhl-expansion-draft-rules/c-281010592

 

* All players who have currently effective and continuing "No Movement" clauses at the time of the Expansion Draft (and who to decline to waive such clauses) must be protected (and will be counted toward their club's applicable protection limits).

 

Edler has an NTC, not NMC. 

 

https://www.capfriendly.com/teams/canucks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said:

We've been through this. 

https://www.nhl.com/news/nhl-expansion-draft-rules/c-281010592

 

* All players who have currently effective and continuing "No Movement" clauses at the time of the Expansion Draft (and who to decline to waive such clauses) must be protected (and will be counted toward their club's applicable protection limits).

 

Edler has an NTC, not NMC. 

 

https://www.capfriendly.com/teams/canucks

+1.  Thanks for clearing that up.  Makes more sense now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Alflives said:

I wonder how much of Phaneuf's Cap the Senators will need to eat for another team to take him?  Heard the Oilers this am too.  Maybe Eberle for Phaneuf (1 million retained)?

I think the reason they need to move Eberle is because of cap issues though. Big payday's coming for McDavid and Draisatl - don't see how the math will work for them. Phaneuf has a huge contract

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ossi Vaananen said:

This is nuts. The last trade was like 2 dozen players at the AHL level, what do the Sens think they'll get for him?

 

He's a decent player with an albatross of a contract. 

I'm not sure there's a team with cap room who's going to be competitive enough to be on his list. Tough situation. I guess he wants a cup though because location wise, waiving to go to Vegas wouldn't be that bad considering his wife is an actress right? Close to LA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Alflives said:

I wonder how much of Phaneuf's Cap the Senators will need to eat for another team to take him?  Heard the Oilers this am too.  Maybe Eberle for Phaneuf (1 million retained)?

my $ on this deal. He's from Edmonton too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...