Eastsidenuck Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 Last proposal before draft. To Van: 7th OA and Sean Day To NYR: Tanev The rags are clearly trying to change things up and after acquiring the 7th OA pick, could they be willing to move it since they're squad looks like they are in win now mode? I think it's possible if they get a top 4 dman. Draft glass and liljegrin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 8 minutes ago, Eastsidenuck said: Last proposal before draft. To Van: 7th OA and Sean Day To NYR: Tanev The rags are clearly trying to change things up and after acquiring the 7th OA pick, could they be willing to move it since they're squad looks like they are in win now mode? I think it's possible if they get a top 4 dman. Draft glass and liljegrin I would love that! I think we would need to add. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kloubek Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 I'd do that. Despite being drafted in the third round, I think the Rangers are fairly high on Day though, and he's a lefty which isn't ideal if we are losing Tanev. If they did, I'd say we'd have to add a prospect or a lesser draft pick to make the value equal. I think their trade today signals that they are no longer seeing their team as a contender though. I believe they took the 7th OA and gave up a consistent scorer in Stepan for that very reason, and as such I'm not sure Tanev fits into their plans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 16 minutes ago, Eastsidenuck said: Last proposal before draft. To Van: 7th OA and Sean Day To NYR: Tanev The rags are clearly trying to change things up and after acquiring the 7th OA pick, could they be willing to move it since they're squad looks like they are in win now mode? I think it's possible if they get a top 4 dman. Draft glass and liljegrin this might have some potential, I think AV thinks very highly of Tanev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 12 minutes ago, Alflives said: I would love that! I think we would need to add. we could. 55th or 64th should do it. Tanev could slot in as their top pairing guy since they bailed on Giradri. This deal actually makes more sense than Dallas. Who knows, maybe the AZ deal has opened something up for us? It certainly makes sense for both sides. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seannnp Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 I like this. Maybe then we can package 33 and 55 and get 20th from St. Louis as well 5OA Glass 7OA Petterssen/Liljegren 20OA Thomas/Foote/Hague Staal replaces Tanev and we can sign another UFA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blömqvist Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 I like it! I was just thinking of a similar thing too after hearing NYR acquired the 7th overall pick. I would do Tanev straight across for the 7th overall pick. Gives us a shot at drafting out potential #1C and top pairing PP QB defenseman with the 5th and 7th picks. Maybe it's a Makar and Pettersson? Or Glass and Liljegren? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHitman Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 40 minutes ago, Blömqvist said: I like it! I was just thinking of a similar thing too after hearing NYR acquired the 7th overall pick. I would do Tanev straight across for the 7th overall pick. Gives us a shot at drafting out potential #1C and top pairing PP QB defenseman with the 5th and 7th picks. Maybe it's a Makar and Pettersson? Or Glass and Liljegren? We shouldn't do Tanev straight across for 3rd overall pick, let alone 7th. Everyone after 1 and 2 is a complete toss-up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 ever think the the rangers really like someone at the 7th spot and why they got the pick?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuck1991 Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 i think benning would want a more of a nhl dman (i mean playing in nhl right now, not questioning Sean Day's ability) but thas a heck of a deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
combover Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 I like it sound realistic Unfortunately it would take an NHL gm to make an NHL trade for the Canucks so... expect maybe an over paid UFA to an unmovable contract And some picks thrown away on other teams projects that's the reality of vancouvers offseason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.