Podz92 Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 15 minutes ago, 48MPHSlapShot said: Yeah, but we wouldn't be trading a 2nd rd pick for him. Lol thank god for small favours eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captainhorvat Posted June 27, 2017 Share Posted June 27, 2017 This is the type of player benning should be going for on July 1st. He put some decent #'s in the ahl last season and nhl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amplified0ne Posted June 27, 2017 Share Posted June 27, 2017 I think the Sedins need to be dropped to at least 2nd line minutes. At this point less is more. Same goes for Edler, should be 3rd d-man minutes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris12345 Posted June 27, 2017 Share Posted June 27, 2017 What a waste of legal fees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChuckNORRIS4Cup Posted June 27, 2017 Share Posted June 27, 2017 Supposedly a lot of teams are going after him... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted June 27, 2017 Share Posted June 27, 2017 I am leaning to him as my first skill FAs. We still need a lean mean gritty machine for bottom 6 though. We too soft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scruffy05 Posted June 27, 2017 Share Posted June 27, 2017 He costs nothing to sign and will make essentially nothing in his first contract. If he hits we all cheer. If he does not we shrug our shoulders and carry on. There is so little risk in signing these types of players- just the contract limit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nancouver Posted June 27, 2017 Share Posted June 27, 2017 I like the idea of weal in our lineup as long as he's cheap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuisHamIsThis? Posted June 27, 2017 Share Posted June 27, 2017 Weal good idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyoung Posted June 27, 2017 Share Posted June 27, 2017 22 hours ago, amplified0ne said: I think the Sedins need to be dropped to at least 2nd line minutes. At this point less is more. Same goes for Edler, should be 3rd d-man minutes. Where did this come from lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted June 27, 2017 Share Posted June 27, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithers joe Posted June 28, 2017 Share Posted June 28, 2017 23 hours ago, amplified0ne said: I think the Sedins need to be dropped to at least 2nd line minutes. At this point less is more. Same goes for Edler, should be 3rd d-man minutes. i think too much is made of line numbers. balance the top 3 lines, and in any game the most effective line gets the most ice team. the lines from game to game may step up and be # 1. it creates a healthy competition for playing time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amplified0ne Posted June 28, 2017 Share Posted June 28, 2017 4 hours ago, cyoung said: Where did this come from lol People keep posting their theoretical line combos. I know it was off-topic but damn, need to find out what we have in some of our young players. Hopefully Green does that. Maybe then it will be more attractive to players like Weal who know they will get an opportunity instead of riding the 4th line playing <10mins a night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lionized27 Posted June 28, 2017 Share Posted June 28, 2017 On 6/26/2017 at 3:09 PM, Ryan Strome said: Yakupov is terrible. Let him drift off to the khl. "Terrible"? No. Worth a two way deal? Absolutely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted June 28, 2017 Share Posted June 28, 2017 4 hours ago, smithers joe said: i think too much is made of line numbers. balance the top 3 lines, and in any game the most effective line gets the most ice team. the lines from game to game may step up and be # 1. it creates a healthy competition for playing time. Amen Joe. The amount of kvetching on what number line 'X' player is on around here is ridiculous. Especially where we are in our development cycle, we have little choice but to role 4 pretty even quality lines. The Sedins aren't good enough anymore to be a '1st' line. Horvat's line isn't good enough yet to be a '1st line'. We need a match up line IMO to take the harder dzone, QOC and PK minutes that will see darn near the same minutes as those other two lines as well. I hope we see a pretty even 15+/- minutes to all four lines over the season. On a game by game basis that could go up or down for any given player as we get more PK's/PP's, leading or trailing, depending on opponent, depending on which line is 'on' that night etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Boudreau Posted June 28, 2017 Share Posted June 28, 2017 Saw this guy at the airport 5 years ago heading to LA was a stocky little bugger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted June 28, 2017 Share Posted June 28, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RRypien37 Posted June 28, 2017 Share Posted June 28, 2017 Another undersized soft forward. Check. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosierdaddy Posted June 28, 2017 Share Posted June 28, 2017 10 minutes ago, RRypien37 said: Another undersized soft forward. Check. Undersized but not soft. He's competitor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.