DefCon1 Posted June 28, 2017 Share Posted June 28, 2017 3 hours ago, Hutton Wink said: Benning may have tipped his hand, when talking about the D after the XD. He mentioned "getting someone to play with Gudbranson", which intentionally or not points right to Kulikov. But many teams sound interested, so I'd also look first at getting Sbisa back if a reasonable price. He only has a year left, and we could either extend or trade him at the TDL for an asset, which gives the likes of Juolevi the opportunity to develop another year. kind of idiotic to give up a 4th for Sbisa now, when GMGM is giving away a much better D man in methot for a 7th round picked prospect and a 2nd that is a decade away. I wouldn't want Sbisa back anyways, probably Canucks are better to sign a D-man at free agency at 2 years with the opened cap space because of Sbisa and possible departure of Miller. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted June 28, 2017 Share Posted June 28, 2017 1 minute ago, DefCon1 said: kind of idiotic to give up a 4th for Sbisa now, when GMGM is giving away a much better D man in methot for a 7th round picked prospect and a 2nd that is a decade away. I wouldn't want Sbisa back anyways, probably Canucks are better to sign a D-man at free agency at 2 years with the opened cap space because of Sbisa and possible departure of Miller. Juiolevi is already better than Sbisa. Olli is on our team next season, and will be top four by Christmas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Visp Posted June 28, 2017 Share Posted June 28, 2017 Of course we should give up a 4th round pick for Sbisa! Not even in question! Played great for us last year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Where's Wellwood Posted June 28, 2017 Share Posted June 28, 2017 Surely Ottawa could have made a side deal to protect Methot if that's the price. Unless Vegas was highballing them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Where's Wellwood Posted June 28, 2017 Share Posted June 28, 2017 On 2017-6-26 at 11:36 PM, oldnews said: Meh, the wake up call came a long time ago when a 2nd was the value of Bieksa..... But....that deal - and this one - have next to nothing to do with Tanev's value, so not really much of a 'wake up call'. If people think the D market is low and dictated by one McPhee Methot move, I think they're being really short-sighted wadr. Bieksa was 34 years old and clearly slowing down. I was ecstatic that we even got that much for him. When he signed the Anaheim extension with a NMC, I laughed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Lock Posted June 29, 2017 Share Posted June 29, 2017 On 6/26/2017 at 5:31 PM, HKSR said: And with that, Tanev is a Canuck for a long, long time. lol I slowed down talking in the armchair GM section when I kept saying the value for Tanev that everyone was asking for was too high. I'd keep getting bashed for suggesting it so I just shrugged and let it be for the time being. People can dream I guess. Not only that, but everyone and their dog's flea was making proposals that involved Tanev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.