J.I.A.H.N Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 So the key to this proposal is timing............just humour me, thanks! Trade Deadline Tanev (28) and Pettersson (18) for Trouba (24) and Winnipeg's 2018 1st At the draft M. Granlund (26) for Baertschi (25) and our 2018 1st July 1st UFA's Evander Kane (26) on a discount $6,000,000 X 6 yrs Resign Sedin's at 1 yr each for 4,000,000 ________________________________________________ 2019 starting line up M Granlund (25) M. Granlund (26) Kane(26) Dahlen 20) Horvat (23) Breser (21) Sedin (37) Sedin (37) Eriksson (32) Goldy (22) Gagner (28) Sutter (29) Gaunce (24) Gaudette (21) Virtanen (21/Lockwood (21) Wife said I could do the defence tomorrow....I have to go to bed! Whipped! At 60! Joulevi(20)/Edler (32) Stecher (23) Hutton (24) Trouba (23) Del Zoto (28) Gudbranson (26) Markstrom 28 Demko (22) Ha! Ha!,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Snuck it in! Before she called! What do you think, would the moves be worth it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coastal.view Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Evander Kane (26) on a discount $6,000,000 X 6 yr never and i do not view that as a discount Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aircool Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 No to every transaction. I think the reasons why are obvious. Indecision like this is how teams remain mediocre for decades. We're rebuilding, these transactions would be the manifestation of a serious case of identity crisis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silky mitts Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 we are not trading away our most recent top 5 pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlanB Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 No to all - each one is terrible. Trouba is a whiner who already caused trouble for the team who drafted him. We're not trading our 1st in the deepest/strongest draft in years. Kane......please..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vancan2233 Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckmen84 Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 10 hours ago, janisahockeynut said: Tanev (28) and Pettersson (18) for Trouba (24) and Winnipeg's 2018 1st Tanev and Trouba is a swap or at lest not that far off, their just two different types of defense men. Pettersson is worth more than the Jets late 1st round pick so how does that make sense? Why would we even trade Pettersson, he is our future and will probably be better than both Granlunds! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winter Soldier Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 These are awful. Fully and completely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crobar Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 1 hour ago, vancan2233 said: Really starting to see where the Nut in your name comes from Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Stopped reading after... 11 hours ago, janisahockeynut said: So the key to this proposal is timing............just humour me, thanks! Trade Deadline Tanev (28) and Pettersson (18) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vancan2233 Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vancan2233 Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vancan2233 Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vancan2233 Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeydownUnder Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 That first trade is absolutely awful for us. Also I am not a fan of signing Evander for 6 years. I'd be interested in a 3 or 4 year contract. I would like to get Granlund but have no interest in trading draft picks or futures and Minnesota is looking to win now. The only older vets we really have that hold value are on defense and Minnesota is pretty set there. Sedins at a year for 4 mil I'd be fine with as long as their play this year doesn't drop too dramatically and as long as there is room on the roster for them. Canucks might be tight for room on the roster though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob_Zepp Posted July 24, 2017 Share Posted July 24, 2017 On 7/5/2017 at 10:39 PM, janisahockeynut said: Wife said I could do the defence tomorrow....I have to go to bed! Whipped! At 60! Think you should have gone to bed earlier with your wife is what I think. What you would do the the Canucks rebuild with your proposal is what could have happened to you if you had done so (I assume that still happens at 60 ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.