Hortankin Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 Next year... Edler Stecher Del Zotto Gudbranson Juolevi Sergachev Trade Gudbranson for a huge return at the TDL (will be a ton of interest) Trade Edler to the Sens for a 1st. Rest of year... Del Zotto Stecher Juolevi Sergachev Pedan Subban Win Dahlin Future... Juolevi Dahlin Sergachev Stecher Brisebois Subban/McEneny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker 67 Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 Okay, sign me up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 This...this is just bad. Like monumentally bad. Giving up 1 incredibly proven top D plus an up and coming D for a rookie that didn't really improve much over the year since his draft and is an absolute unknown in the NHL finish 31st or 30th and draft 3rd 4th or 5th and no Dahlin.... Just no. You don't just hand over assets for free to simply tank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hortankin Posted July 12, 2017 Author Share Posted July 12, 2017 3 minutes ago, Warhippy said: This...this is just bad. Like monumentally bad. Giving up 1 incredibly proven top D plus an up and coming D for a rookie that didn't really improve much over the year since his draft and is an absolute unknown in the NHL finish 31st or 30th and draft 3rd 4th or 5th and no Dahlin.... Just no. You don't just hand over assets for free to simply tank. I go Tanev for Sergachev and I'm called crazy and now I throw Hutton in to sweeten the deal and it's monumentally bad? Haha really? Hutton has top for potential and that's his ceiling IMO. Sergachev is a huge upgrade over Hutton for our future Atleast I know I won't be criticized for being a Homer this time hahahahaha you people are just never satisfied, I really get a kick out of it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 Just now, Hortankin said: I go Tanev for Sergachev and I'm called crazy and now I throw Hutton in to sweeten the deal and it's monumentally bad? Haha really? Hutton has top for potential and that's his ceiling IMO. Sergachev is a huge upgrade over Hutton for our future Sergachev could also run to the KHL, and we end up with nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hortankin Posted July 12, 2017 Author Share Posted July 12, 2017 Just now, Alflives said: Sergachev could also run to the KHL, and we end up with nothing. That's a possibility but I doubt it'll happen. Maybe after Tryamkin JB might not trust going for a Russian but that's besides the point. If there was no way he would bolt to Russia would you make the trade? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fateless Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 3 minutes ago, Hortankin said: you people are just never satisfied Maybe your ideas just suck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 Just now, Hortankin said: That's a possibility but I doubt it'll happen. Maybe after Tryamkin JB might not trust going for a Russian but that's besides the point. If there was no way he would bolt to Russia would you make the trade? Yup, I would. Sergachev has a much higher ceiling than Hutton, and .Tanev will be old when our rebuild is done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hortankin Posted July 12, 2017 Author Share Posted July 12, 2017 Just now, Fateless said: Maybe your ideas just suck. Maybe they do, maybe they don't. . But I know my ideas are better than yours Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hortankin Posted July 12, 2017 Author Share Posted July 12, 2017 @FatelessI love haters so keep on hating.. it gives me enjoyment on here.. my positive vibes are starting to get to the negative posters here on CDC.. I'll call this summer a success Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hortankin Posted July 12, 2017 Author Share Posted July 12, 2017 2 minutes ago, Alflives said: Yup, I would. Sergachev has a much higher ceiling than Hutton, and .Tanev will be old when our rebuild is done. But it's such a monumentally bad proposal ... right @Warhippy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fanuck Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 Why did you start a thread asking if we need Dahlen if you have him penciled into the lineup in this thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hortankin Posted July 12, 2017 Author Share Posted July 12, 2017 1 minute ago, Fanuck said: Why did you start a thread asking if we need Dahlen if you have him penciled into the lineup in this thread? Brainstorming We have Dahlen already btw. I don't think I stated anywhere in here that we NEEDED Dahlin did I? Please correct me if I'm wrong... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fateless Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 5 minutes ago, Hortankin said: my positive vibes are starting to get to the negative posters here on CDC.. I'll call this summer a success They aren't positive vibes, they're just incoherent nonsense. There are so many leaps in your logic that its just laughable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fanuck Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 4 minutes ago, Hortankin said: Brainstorming We have Dahlen already btw. I don't think I stated anywhere in here that we NEEDED Dahlin did I? Please correct me if I'm wrong... You know exactly what I'm talking about : Look Hort, I'm not saying this to be critical because generally I don't have a problem with your content, and yes I know there's no limit on here, but lately it seems you've taken to the 'quantity over quality' philosophy regarding your threads and it's just weakening your overall rep here. Again, not criticism, just observation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hortankin Posted July 12, 2017 Author Share Posted July 12, 2017 2 minutes ago, Fanuck said: You know exactly what I'm talking about : Look Hort, I'm not saying this to be critical because generally I don't have a problem with your content, and yes I know there's no limit on here, but lately it seems you've taken to the 'quantity over quality' philosophy regarding your threads and it's just weakening your overall rep here. Again, not criticism, just observation. I know what your talking about lol. But what I'm saying is in this particular thread I did not state we NEEDED Dahlin.. just ideas for different directions we could go. I'll admit and kind of always do that I make a lot of threads.. but that's just the summer boredom kicking in.. idc about rep points on here tbh I kind of get a kick out of the minuses I get for saying positive things.. but if my threads bother people so much they do have this thing called a brain that can tell them not to click on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fateless Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 2 minutes ago, Hortankin said: But what I'm saying is in this particular thread I did not state we NEEDED Dahlin.. just ideas for different directions we could go. Why not just have one coherent thread where you logically set our your reasons for why you don't think Dahlin is necessary (or why he is) and then explain a coherent proposal trading Tanev and Hutton for Sergachev + under the assumption we can land Dahlin. That's why you've been getting flack from me and others lately. As @Fanuck said, you're just churning out mindless threads with no real substance to them lately. Why not spend a bit more time developing your argument before posting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlanB Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 3 minutes ago, Fanuck said: Look Hort, I'm not saying this to be critical because generally I don't have a problem with your content, and yes I know there's no limit on here, but lately it seems you've taken to the 'quantity over quality' philosophy regarding your threads and it's just weakening your overall rep here. Again, not criticism, just observation. Listen to Fanuck, please listen to him.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hortankin Posted July 12, 2017 Author Share Posted July 12, 2017 Getting way off topic here.. anyone got any comments on the suggested proposal before a mod decides to lock it lol? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlanB Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 3 minutes ago, Hortankin said: anyone got any comments on the suggested proposal before a mod decides to lock it lol? Fateless already took my comment: 6 minutes ago, Fateless said: That's why you've been getting flack from me and others lately. As @Fanuck said, you're just churning out mindless threads with no real substance to them lately. Why not spend a bit more time developing your argument before posting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.