Nucker 67 Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 I'd like to vote (RW) Alexis D'Aoust. How do I do that? Just turned 21. 6'0" 200 lbs. Last year in the Q = 29g 31a for 60 pts in 50 games played. The year before he had 98 pts in 68 games played. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alfstonker Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 Voted Zhukenov - again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VIC_CITY Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 1 hour ago, alfstonker said: Voted Zhukenov - again He does look like an interesting talent. It's been between him and Labate these last few rounds IMO but somehow these big time long shots keep getting picked. Not to say Zhukenov is a sure thing but he seems like a legit prospect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apollo Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 Voting Andrey. Shocked he hasn't been picked yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesB Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 17 hours ago, Brad Marchand said: Note: this will be the last poll. A final thread with the top 20 ranking will be posted at the conclusion of voting (within the next two days). Thanks for doing this, @Brad Marchand. It provided Canuck hockey "news" in an otherwise very slow period. Gave me something to check out every day. But I think stopping at 20 is the right call. At this stage we are up to do guys who are very long shots to become good NHL players, although chances are that at least one or two of the 18 guys on the current list still available in the poll will achieve that. (Each guy is a long shot, with maybe a 5% to 10% chance of becoming a good NHL player -- some more than others. But 18 long shots add up to a high likelihood of one or two guys making it.) I have Holm at this stage, given what he did in the SHL last year. I also like Rathbone, but obviously he is a long way away and won't even play in college next year. But I would not be surprised to see him in the WJC in 2019. And there are guys who are likely to get some time in the NHL this season, like Pedan and Labate, but are unlikely to ever be more than marginal players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diamonds Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 I voted for Zhukenov. He has the talent to be much higher on this list but I think people are concerned he might not return to North America. I'm also surprised at how few votes Jasek has been getting. He had a pretty good season and should have more opportunities this coming season on a new team. I guess it really just speaks to how much better our prospect pool has become when just recently these guys were pushing for top 10 spots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker 67 Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 Looks like Rathbone may be the #20. Surprising I think, as Pedan, Zhukenov, Labate and even Gunnarsson have or may play in the NHL sooner. It's great that the Canucks now have a prospect pool they can be proud of. So, if Rathbone is the #20: LW - Dahlen, Gadjovich, Molino C - Pettersson, Gaudette, MacEwen RW - Boeser, Goldobin, Virtanen, Lind, Lockwood, Palmu D - Juolevi, Brisebois, Subban, McEneny, Chatfield, Rathbone G - Demko, DiPietro Future looks good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Rocket Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 48 minutes ago, NUCKER67 said: Looks like Rathbone may be the #20. Surprising I think, as Pedan, Zhukenov, Labate and even Gunnarsson have or may play in the NHL sooner. It's great that the Canucks now have a prospect pool they can be proud of. So, if Rathbone is the #20: LW - Dahlen, Gadjovich, Molino C - Pettersson, Gaudette, MacEwen RW - Boeser, Goldobin, Virtanen, Lind, Lockwood, Palmu D - Juolevi, Brisebois, Subban, McEneny, Chatfield, Rathbone G - Demko, DiPietro Future looks good I agree. Only negative I can see is we only have 1 top 4 D in our pool, unless some one heavily exceeds expectations. Other than that though we have at least one good prospect at every position, if not multiple options Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 9 minutes ago, Canadian Clay said: I agree. Only negative I can see is we only have 1 top 4 D in our pool, unless some one heavily exceeds expectations. Other than that though we have at least one good prospect at every position, if not multiple options Brisebois has all the tools to be a top 4. He's got good size, excellent skating, and good hockey IQ. Hopefully he raises his stock in Utica this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyoung Posted August 11, 2017 Share Posted August 11, 2017 5 hours ago, DeNiro said: Brisebois has all the tools to be a top 4. He's got good size, excellent skating, and good hockey IQ. Hopefully he raises his stock in Utica this season. I agree, his progression has been super positive. I expect him to be a regular in Utica. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gino#29 Posted August 11, 2017 Share Posted August 11, 2017 i think labate and pedan have a good chance of being canuck regulars this season because the canucks have two guys on the roster that can deter the marchands of the league right now.one is coming of neck surgery,the other wrist surgery.fighting isn't completey out of the nhl yet,when it is they should call it the not hockey league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkstar Posted August 14, 2017 Share Posted August 14, 2017 I think Rathbone will make the biggest jump next year on this board. Kid has got loads of potential. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dixon Ward Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 If we sign Alex Kerfoot, where will he be on this list? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.