• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.
Adarsh Sant

[Speculation] David Pastrnak to be traded

Recommended Posts

At least he didn't say he was going to be traded tomorrow like the Leon Draisaitl thread lol!!

Edited by Superlative
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would love to get him

 

Pastrnak - Horvat - Boeser

 

...but it would cost a ton. Virtanen and Gudbranson? (or is that even enough?)

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He probably asking for an outrageous contract. 

 

Could this be comparable with what will happen to Bo? So far 2 of the 3 top rfas are "to be traded" 

 

Leon, David... Bo is the 3rd best RFA. I expect him to follow suit 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, NUCKER67 said:

Would love to get him

 

Pastrnak - Horvat - Boeser

 

...but it would cost a ton. Virtanen and Gudbranson? (or is that even enough?)

Hmmm that's not too far off. If David wants under 5.5 mill, I'd be down to do that trade 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, apollo said:

He probably asking for an outrageous contract. 

 

Could this be comparable with what will happen to Bo? So far 2 of the 3 top rfas are "to be traded" 

 

Leon, David... Bo is the 3rd best RFA. I expect him to follow suit 

 

 

no. Its already not comparable, with both sides saying things are progressing well. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, S'all Good Man said:

no. Its already not comparable, with both sides saying things are progressing well. 

Hope you're right. I want him locked up. Bo = beauty 

 

I've been saying "could this be comparable to Bo's contract / situation" in multiple threads now... Kind of satirically 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, apollo said:

Hmmm that's not too far off. If David wants under 5.5 mill, I'd be down to do that trade 

Hah, that's a good one. 

  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, NUCKER67 said:

Would love to get him

 

Pastrnak - Horvat - Boeser

 

...but it would cost a ton. Virtanen and Gudbranson? (or is that even enough?)

Probably not... but who knows? We're one of the few teams with some depth on D and the cap space to sign him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully they do trade him, and get a similar return to what Seguin got them.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Stelar said:

Trading a young power forward to Boston before they have a chance to blossom hasn't worked out real well for us. 

I was just thinking that, I suggested Virtanen and Gudbranson, which is a nice haul for BOS, but maybe VAN shouldn't trade their only two physical players lol Maybe dangle Goldobin, Gaunce, Baertschi, etc. instead.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, NUCKER67 said:

Would love to get him

 

Pastrnak - Horvat - Boeser

 

...but it would cost a ton. Virtanen and Gudbranson? (or is that even enough?)

Thinking a player who is still a project and someone who is a bottom-pairing D is capable of getting a 70 point scoring winger?

Yeah, no.

  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.