• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      All Threads Must Contain Tags!   07/25/2017

      ALL THREADS MUST CONTAIN TAGS   All threads in this forum must contain tags prefixed to topic titles. The purpose of the tags is to eliminate confusion in recent threads lists, and to create an organized and consistent environment. Moderators may immediately lock and thread that does not contain tags.    Tags must be placed at the start of your thread title, following this exact formatting:    [Tag] Thread Title   Here are some of the most used popular tags:    [Proposal]
      A trade, or trades, for next season, or even the off-season.
      [Off-Season]
      FA signings, off-season trades for RFA's, UFA's rights etc...
      [Value Of]
      (A question regarding a players worth, whether from another team, or the Canucks)
      [Speculation] Posting a rumor (with a source of course), but providing why it could be possible for the Canucks to land that player.   [Discussion]
      Thoughts on team trading strategy and composition.   Please feel free to create your own tag if none of these suit your thread.   
Misconduct16

[Discussion] What would you do for Duchene?

Recommended Posts

On 2017-09-15 at 2:22 PM, KKnight said:

You dont win anything with players like Duchene. Landeskog on the other hand. Get him out of Colorado and he will be a consistent 50 pt guy with edge to his game. 

Watch him go to a team and end up winning a cup ala Kessel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, ice orca said:

Watch him go to a team and end up winning a cup ala Kessel.

that was the perfect situation for Kessel. Pens already had an amazing team. Put Kessel on the Canucks and he wouldnt be able to carry the team. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, KKnight said:

that was the perfect situation for Kessel. Pens already had an amazing team. Put Kessel on the Canucks and he wouldnt be able to carry the team. 

Should have made it clearer, i meant if he goes to a contender.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sakic would most likely want Juolevi + 1st + and there's no way Canucks do that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.